Transcript
-K03Dic9hns • "Americans Are So Naive" - Corrupt Elites, Rich vs Poor, Trump & 2024 Election | Michael Malice
/home/itcorpmy/itcorp.my.id/harry/yt_channel/out/TomBilyeu/.shards/text-0001.zst#text/1056_-K03Dic9hns.txt
Kind: captions Language: en I think the world would be a lot better place if more people understood that political Authority is inherently illegitimate you got to care about this transgender bathrooms what's your opinion we didn't care about it 5 minutes ago we're not care about five minutes from now but you this is the most important thing happening in America right now it's impossible to convince a man of something if his salary depends on it not being true and when those leaders have personal consequences very quickly uh they start changing their tun Michael malice welcome to the show thank you for having me I'm very glad to have you and I want to ask you would life be better the world be better if tomorrow instantly everybody became an anarchist to the best of their abilities and I mean in real life the word better is a loaded word because I think a lot of people when they hear the word better think there's no cost right so I'll give you another example let's suppose I waved them magic wand and instantly everyone's lifespan was exactly one year better one year longer right well you'd have a lot of kids dying at one year of age right who otherwise would have been still born so there's a huge cost there right so if everyone became an anarchist the best their ability I don't know what being an anarchist the best of their ability would mean for a lot of people I don't think most people think philosophically or at all um but I think the world would would be a lot better place if more people understood that political Authority is inherently illegitimate um and that we are all individually responsible and accountable for our lives and for our communities and things like that okay where the rubber mea Road how does it become better if more people think that uh government is illegitimate because you would have far fewer police enforcing nonsensical edicts from sociopathic politicians you would have far more of an incentive and a mindset for people to form solutions to problems that have otherwise been left to the mercy of the state you would have no war you would have far more interest on the local level in getting things done and making things happen um and there would be a lot less animosity which I think politics engenders in almost all of us for the specific reason that if I am I don't know my neighbors's political views are I don't talk to them right but now I have to care because government forces us into a polity where we basically have to have this relationship that is nonsensical and illegitimate if that's taken away then their political views are the same as basically their musical taste if I don't have to hear it more power to you I think fewer police that that one's going to trigger people so if you're police enforcing they're right the nonsensical laws but uh why would that be an automatic reaction to people recognizing that government's power is illegitimate because if I'm a cop right I would understand I have no power to do half the things that I'm alleged to be able to do I think so here's my reaction is that that makes the hypothesis that the crimes are being committed because of the state not that they're just a natural state of human no I'm saying most police activity is inherently criminal things like if you have some drug in your house I can break down your door and wave guns around that is insane um almost all of these kind of militarized police um attacks on people's homes which would make sense in the context of if there's a hostage right or someone's in imminent physical danger you break down the door this we we don't have time to mess around but any other circum it makes absolutely no sense and yet it happens on a daily basis this is something that under anarchism you would understand is completely illegitimate and insane and those cops you just saw I'm sure a lot of people saw recently cops knocked on the door some guy opened the door holding the gun at his side he was ex-military and they killed him and then they doubled down saying you know we were scared you know this is this is psychosis you don't get to knock on some one's door and if they're in their own home having not pointing at you draw on them and kill them and not have conse quences for it I mean these people aren't going to jail they're probably not even going to get fired it's just deranged and this is what having a populace raised in government schools tends to accept as the norm and just because something is common doesn't mean it's normal or acceptable okay that's a very powerful thing that I want to come back to but um so when I think about anarchism and as an ideology it the sort of maximizing Freedom everybody is responsible for themselves everybody's free to choose as they want it's consensual relationships all around I don't know I'd say maximizing freedom because it's kind of a binary because just because you understand state power is illegitimate doesn't mean you're really in a position to do anything about it right true if I understand that I'm a hostage in this jail right that doesn't really mean I'm in a position to get out of this jail yep so I don't like the term maximizing because that implies that if something is like smaller government where it's AOK it's more like a binary switch that okay this is all [ __ ] got it okay so we have to tease apart two different things one a world in which you have anarchists living under a state trying to sort of migrate the state in One Direction versus the snap your fingers and everybody's an anarchist you keep saying everyone and I pushed back on that before it's not everyone I don't think everyone has I I this isn't Disney uh you know politics is not for everyone I'm not a fan of democracy and there's nothing wrong with that I shouldn't be having an opinion on meteorology modern dance lots of quis I mean there's you got a list of things I should be running my mouth about like there's no shortage so the idea that somehow everyone should have an opinion on the state and political philosophy is ridiculous and the only reason we accept it even as a hypothesis is that we're taught to the contrary since we were kids in government schools and through corporate media it makes no sense whatsoever well I think there's a bigger question that we're going to have to tackle which is why we end up in this place anyway with States sure which seems to me to be there's there is a natural thing that happens when humans organize that leads to some sort of State CU I've heard you say that even at the hunter gatherer level you're going to find people that they've created some sort of proxy of a state this is the thing people have this belief um which is a lie spread intentionally that any sort of organization is a government and they'll be like well without a government who's going to protect you my bodyguard isn't my president My Bodyguard who's the one giving orders The Bodyguard or you as opposed to who's giving the orders the government or the citizen so these are not analogous phenomenon even though the service stely being provided is security okay is there a default thing in the human mind that as we get together in collectives that we we don't necessarily have to end up in the kind of states that we see now correct or any state at all I do think hierarchy is inevitable okay in fact hierarchy is inevitable the term pecking order comes from Birds right so this left anarchist anarco communist idea that hierarchies can be abolished is impossible and and incoherent because even children do it you know any kind of group you know it's not the people who claim to be natural leaders but if even in a party people are going to be centers of attention people are going to be running the show like people find their niche in different contexts different ways and some people are followers in all contexts that's nothing wrong with that I mean there's many I don't tell my lawyer what to do I don't tell my accountant what to do I don't tell my doctor what to do I sit down and shut f up and I am subordinate to someone who knows what they're talking about in that context so and there's some people who are like look I just want to do my job put in hard days work take care of my family and that is not just commendable but heroic but they're never going to be leaders and that's fine okay so it is not a foregone conclusion that people will end up with States correct it is a foregone conclusion that humans as animals are going to end up in a hierarchical structure we see that way deeper than just humans yes so then the question becomes do you think there's a reason that the preponderance of States at least that exist right now leverage that I mean I used it in the definition that they end up in states that we would recognize yes it's it's it's organized systematized banditry which why did that start because it's a great way for people to Rob populaces and get enormously powerful enormously wealthy without having a lift a finger okay so if that is basically um a marketplace where an efficienc arises that so I think it presupposes that that some part of the population wants power correct which is I think not in dispute for anybody yeah no I don't think people are going to be weird about that one uh so we've got a part of the populace they're going to want power and the state as we see it now the different flavors but the state as we see it now is a uh a market efficiency coming to the four where it's a great way for a select few to Garner to co-opt the money Focus whatever it is that they're trying to co-op of the populace the money is secondary I think the power is primary and the status I mean humans are status seeking animals uh I don't think a lot I think a lot of politicians in fact i' bet a majority if you ask them would you rather be super wealthy or super powerful they they've moving toward the powerful uh technique I wouldn't call it market efficiency because I think governments are oppositional to markets by definition um but it certainly fills some kind of psychological need and I think a lot of people again since geman times have been you know the whole big man big man theory of how governments arose people do understand that we need security we need some semblance of order the myth and or I should say lie is that this has to or can only happen as a function of a government or someone imposing this on the populace which if you think about it for a few seconds is really demonstrably false what I'm trying to parse out in all of this is I find the uh Anarchist as you define it I want to be very clear CU you're my only interaction with anarchism as a way of thinking but as you define it it is pretty interesting but then as I try to go okay well wait are you trying to convince people which you've made very clear off camera you're not trying to prze or convince anybody of anything but I'm trying to figure out do you think this has real world applications and people should really give this a look or I don't use the word should what word would you use this whole concept of should I don't know somebody else's context so if this is something that people find interesting or thought-provoking or or just historically interesting then more power to them they can read the anarchist handbook and I do think the more people who of a certain type who fall into line with this kind of thinking the better off we will all be but I don't believe in this kind of there's that tricky word better yes I don't believe in blanket prescriptions for like a big audience that that I mean a lot of people have better things to do than think about anarchism interesting do you feel the West is going in a bad Direction it's not going in a unitary Direction I think there are certain aspects of the West that are going in a horrifically bad Direction horrifically quickly but there are elements in the west where things are going in a much healthier and better Direction um so I don't think the West as a whole moves like some big hulking Mass uh I think there's Trends and it's a question of which will win out and my operating assumption which I think is impossible to argue with is reality always wins and that a worldview which comports to reality which means based on truth because that's what truth is that which is real will in the long term succeed but how long that long term is is the question on the table and it's certainly going to be a lot of bad things to put a modly in the inter room and and are currently happening so I believe that the reason the elements of the West are moving in the wrong direction is an is one of ideas that yes I actually don't think that we have free will but I do think that we respond to ideas humans okay some human I this you think all humans are wired the same mentally no definitely not okay yeah okay I just don't think that we have free will so I think we are all wired and I think that 50% of us is hardwired 50% is malleable but the question is can we choose in what direction to think like we could we will probably go down a very nonuseful rabbit hole right now if we attack free will but just so I know do you think humans have free will um I think that's one of those things where it's just a semantic discussion because if people don't have free will it appears as if they do you know what I mean 100% it's talking circles perfect okay so for this conversation I will operate the way that I operate my daily life which is I am influenced by ideas and I believe I can influence other people but this 50/50 thing doesn't pass the sniff test with me because that seems to me like lazy thinking it's re this is where the science 5050 saying the science even makes me tense but so I have not gone in and pulled all the the citations to to make sure that the headlines that I'm reading are accurate uh but I've heard that over and over and over from people like Brett Weinstein who I it back because I whenever there's like oh these two sides are evenly distributed that usually something someone didn't do theom I agree and that's probably true in the grand scheme so we'll take it as sort of just directional but this isn't me making up that oh I feel like but the idea being that ideas are going to be the thing that influence the direction we're going in so what I'm trying to figure out is is um so with the base assumption I have that you're a incredibly useful thinker and that the world would be better off for encountering your ideas that's the spirit in which I'm trying to chase the following thought down okay uh is anarchism a red herring or because like when I read your book the white pill which is extraordinary and should be required reading for anybody in the west I've told you off camera how strongly I feel about that book well you can't tell an anist thing should be required even if it's my book but what I want to know is like that book doesn't even seem to I don't remember it even oh it does mention anarchism in the beginning sure but like you certainly don't put it forth as like and now we need to be Anarchist so you don't correct to fight this you don't have to be an anarchist to be against the Soviet Union so now that's put it modly thank the Lord so the question becomes is anarchy just a red herring and it's just like a you thing and you're into it and it's a fun idea and you play with it on the weekends or is this like one of the ideas that we need to put on the table that we hope people will adopt in some real where the rubber meets the road way that will take those elements of the West that are going very rapidly in the wrong direction and help reorient them I really would want to stop using the word v in this conversation because I never know who you're referring to and it sounds like I'm being difficult so um anarchism isn't a red herring because anarchism is the norm for human behavior and I'll give you some examples of anarchist system which system which no one thinks of as Anarchist but they take for granted language is an anarchist system there's no president of English you can speak if you want to make a language Tom and and you know talk it to yourself it's going to have marginal utility and marginal adoption there's a reason reason English or some other language historically have been a linga franaqua sometimes it's mandated by the government but a lot of times it's a function of this is something international trade or something like that uh you can force your employees to use proper English but slang is perfect legitimate English language evolves develops by infinite people making marginal changes over time and over space Cuisine is another Anarchist system physics mathematics music these are all systems of millions of people throughout history making marginal incremental changes moving the needle and you're free to choose to adopt them or not and in doing fashion and in doing so everyone has or not everyone I'm sorry a enormous amount of people have benefit fitted and moved culture forward and moved Humanity forward as a whole so instead of thinking of anarchism as like like a third political party it's more of a system without a centralized State control and if you think about how common that is and how much we take that for granted you'll see it's not a red herring but is the basis for all that is decent and good in humanity okay uh am I trying to apply Anarchy at the wrong level so I'm trying to see if it if we would be better off where who's we uh okay so I think some people would be worse off because they'd be hanging from lamposts interesting tell me more I mean some of these evil politicians who like in some of these countries I mean like the reason I did a book on North Korea as you know the re one of the reasons North Korea hasn't liberalized is because they understand very well that if North Korea became Freer they'd be coming for the dictators and his minions and they'd be you know putting them in the and with good reason so it would not be better for everyone if North Korea liberalized even though be better for a huge percentage of that population Kim Jong-un would have a big problem so when I say we I mean humans and I simply mean the vast majority of humanity so my norstar when I try to think through these problems is G gear towards human flourishing for as many people as possible because obviously we're never going to be able to get it for everybody uh but by way of quick example so democracy beat out the communism in the Soviet Union sure to me that was just a straight line to this is better yes um and can I want to add to your point for the mouse traps people have in their heads better doesn't mean perfect correct and better doesn't mean that some things didn't get worse it's a net better and that's all we can do so I agree with your point I just want to make that clear because people have just their brains just kick in they freak out yeah no I I try to preempt the comment sometimes where I'm like ah I know I never called it a mouse trap but I think that's exactly correct okay so that's all I mean when I say we Humanity the majority as close to everybody as we can get making things better that this is humans can flourish can spend time defining that if it will help the conversation but I don't know that we but I don't know that I'm not looking I don't know that the majority is the goal because if there's a lot of horrible people and if you look at books if you look at TV shows if you look at podcasts the majority are garbage but you wouldn't say literature sucks or podcast suck some podcasts many podcasts change people's lives and have profoundly positive consequences so when you're looking at like the majority I think that often is a misguided uh um goal I think it's more like if you reach the you know Ein Rand in her book The Fountain Head at the very end spoiler alert has the hero give a speech and the opening line is you know I'm going to paraphrase it thousands of years ago uh some man figured out to to how to build fire he was probably burned at the stake that he taught his brothers to build so I think a lot of times the majority is the problem and I don't think that they're reachable although they're they would benefit as a consequence but if you're trying to help them as your goal it's missing the Mark I don't see a way to avoid if I want to make my life better I don't see a way to avoid dealing with the masses do you no but you don't have to deal the Ma I'm sure Quest was never bought by majority of Americans there's no product that 51% of Americans consume not even a president because yeah but now you've changed the level again so you said majority yeah yeah yeah but what I'm what I'm trying to say is at at the level of governments at States what's the what should be the operating system there shouldn't be one yep you don't like the word should well there shouldn't be an Opera there shouldn't be government that's an anarchism means okay right but so the absence of the state right anarchism forgive me I will routinely make the mistake of speaking of anarchism as if it is rather than a relationship it is a thing you've been clear it's just trying to constantly be good about that my apologies I do understand what you're saying but again what I'm trying to figure out is I think the bad ideas have seeped into the West some elements of the West are now racing into a horrible Direction extremely quickly I'm trying to identify what ideas people should be you don't like that word I do I'll even use a ought to be grabbing on in a moralistic sense I think that some ideas are more moral than others and so true even at a minimum if I'm just trying to figure out for my own life but I'm nested inside of a system so I'm trying instead of just talking at my sort of micro level which is already nested inside of a capitalistic democracy which is having some troubles as of late by my estimation um I'm trying to look to see is this an idea set this being anarchism a useful idea set at the level of a lack of governing body or governing body so that I can either adopt them myself and try to spread them wider or be like yeah this doesn't work where the rubber meets the road and I've seen a ton of people ask you these questions and it it will often get either bogged down or it just turns into comedy and I can never [ __ ] like ah what the [ __ ] like am I supposed to do this is it going to be useful to lead people to human flourishing or not that's where I'm trying to figure out it will be useful to lead some people and some people AR you can't lead some people you can only lead some people you can't lead everybody so at the very least you're going to have to pick and choose and some people are going to be a net cost as you're an entrepreneur you have to have some Criterion some filtering mechanism who's going to be working for your company Y and some people are going to be a net enormous net cost and that that net cost can be uh pernicious and spread throughout the company I'm sure you've seen this over and over this is this is not new to anyone who's even on a small level involved in in business I hope you're enjoying this episode with Michael malice if you're tired of trying to find the real truth you have to strive to tell whether the news that you're getting is actual real reporting biased narratives trolling selective reporting whatever the case may be then you need to be using ground news I especially like their election page where you can learn more about candidates sort news coverage by key voting issues and get a specific election related blind spot feed to make sure you're not missing out on important stories go to ground. Newsom or use the link in the video description to subscribe today if you sign up through my link you'll get 40% off the same Vantage plan I use to get unlimited access to all their features I really like ground news I think you guys are going to love it they are doing important work and I hope you're going to check them out and stay informed and get rid of your blind spots this is a great way to do it with ground news so there's two types of fil filters right there's the filter where you keep out people that you want and there's a filter where you filter error and there's a filter error where you let in people that you don't want so my point is if you are spreading ideas that are valid and comport to reality uh and maybe I should be more you know proactive but I'm just despite being the subject of book called ego and hebreus I do have a sense of humility about what impact I could possibly have I think at a certain point you do reach the right Minds people become activated and then it's kind of like a spark setting a fire um but in terms of its utility it's enormously useful because instead of wondering you know why are the Republicans doing this why are the Democrats doing this you know a it's for power and you also know be they don't believe what they're saying even as they're saying it you're wasting your breath in trying to engage with people like I'll give you an example of what I mean the best argument against gun control isn't arguing with gun control Advocates it's gun proliferation the best argument for censorship is the fact that it's impossible for me now to censor a book I've used this example many times 200 years ago if I didn't want your book to exist what I got to do I kill you I burn all the copies it's it's ceases to exist now and if I told you this 20 years ago I'd sound like a lunatic I can take any book I can duplicate it infinitely I can send it anywhere on Earth at the speed of light for free and I could encrypt it with a magic spell such that only someone who has the counter spell can read this book so even if you kill me and you destroy all the copies of my books that are on this earth right now you still haven't censored it cuz there's out there and they could be infinitely replicated so that is the answer to censorship instead of of sitting here and talking past each other about well is it appropriate for this book to exist or this book to not exist so the idea of anarchism in this context is if the government says this book is illegal there it is not morally binding on you at all if Nancy Pelosi or Donald Trump have an opinion it's only of Merit in so far as this is an impediment to work around as opposed to you know I should really take this person's opinion seriously after all they are the speaker of the house that is anarchism in practice if I'm understanding you correctly I am sort of looking at anarchism at the wrong level that it really is a thing that you do at the individual relationship level um yes it's yes so would you think it then a like if there were people out there just campaigning hardcore to get nation states to resend their nation state goodness and adopt their the country level organizing Principle as anarchism would you be indifferent to that would you be supportive of that would you be against that I would be uh um skeptical because if you I've always said you don't need a majority you need an alternative Elon Musk just having Twitter I don't want to call it X sorry Elon just having if Elon had had Twitter during covid imagine how different the conversation would be whether you like it or not agreed if you have one Outlet where there is a place for an alternative view for a long time lefties were having a complete meltdown because Roger Al created Fox News right and it's you had CBS NBC ABC CNN and then Here Comes Fox and it's like holy crap someone who takes right of Center views seriously excuse me doesn't clown conservatives they must be destroyed now you know it's Off to the Races in terms of of perspectives and channels point being Fox never uh had the market of all those others combined it was just one alternative but just having that one alternative is enormously powerful for better for worse in terms of moving the dynamic of the conversation so that is kind of I think the key as long as you have one in terms of the country though that that's dangerous because if you have this worldwide Global he hemony where every part of the Earth has to be under even Antarctica has to be under the thumb of a country and and a government and you have this one little area that is like we're going to be Sovereign and not recognized nation states well if they make it work these dominoes are going to start collapsing and that very quickly means that governments are going to start trying to do what they can to invade that little area anarchism isn't utopian at a certain point even if you have the right views an EV government evil government can come in and Slaughter you all I mean look at how many governments throughout history have murdered religious people for their views peaceful religious people just killed so it's a good bullwark against governments as if you have a population that's heavily armed and ready to prepare their country that's going to be very tough to take over as we as Afghanistan demonstrated but at a certain point again evil can win in the short term and if they allowed this one Anarchist area to exist The Jig would be up worldwide so I would caution that place or that population to like think this through because right now and people don't realize this because one of the arguments against anarchism is well if there's no Army then anyone can invade there are many countries on Earth right now with no military zero but they're not invaded because they're there under kind of the wing of other powerful nation states who are forcing a international hegemonic order but if you have a country that's a threat to that very quickly the dynamic changes because now you're threatening the narrative and the lie that has been spread throughout the world and for the last 100 years what is the lie that's government Authority is legitimate and every part of the Earth has to be under the thumb of one government or another okay uh so right now we are living through a very fascinating moment where we are turning back into a uni a multi-polar world from many people listening to this will have grown up in the whatever how many years you want to clock it depending on if you started at the fall of the Berlin wall or the crumbling of the USSR but it's roughly since the early 90s and it's been Us hemony in the world um we're now going back to where there are multiple Powers certainly us China well I don't think us it wasn't us hemony I don't think most these nations had American values agreed but you don't think that us was the dominant Global superpower with the reserve currency that when they said do this people did that not everybody I I always thought it had gery as a monopoly as a function correct right so I don't think the US had Monopoly power over the world after the fall of the Soviet Union certainly China North Korea many African nations South American countries they didn't have the political influence you're just now seeing China over the last call it 10 or 15 years really begins but I meant China had influence over China right like that's what I mean so a lot of these countries although we were powerful worldwide but like just by one way of example the only reason China didn't invade Taiwan is because us had and so that's what I'm talking about when I say hegemonic power and now China is making noises like yeah we might oh yeah because they're saying us is getting weak we're getting powerful we no longer have to listen to you and it's a multi-polar yes I think that's transition is correct yeah okay so the reason I bring it up again I'm just still trying to navigate where the edges are I think I'm beginning to actually understand this reasonably well I'm going to try to present your thinking back to you in a way that you will recognize if any of of this breaks then I'm still lost but let me try there's something you just said that you've said multiple times but it didn't sink in uh until now that you just need an alternative yes so I think I was trying to apply anarchism at a level that you would you said that you would caution people again slow down really look at because if you do it and you prove that this works that it's going to cause these bigger powers to attack you that feels very sort of real politique and can I give an example that's obvious like when you have um uh um all like how many of like drug legalization campaigns were fought by like alcohol companies right because if really you didn't know this no yeah this is or or I remember who it was point being if you have people drinking less this is going to be a threat to them so it's like behind the scenes they're like we got to make sure this gets dipped in the bud that's it makes sensear but it makes sense horing at the same time yeah oh yeah right so in this context if you have an alternative to the nation state wait a minute this is going to be a big problem for we got to make sure it gets nipped in the butt okay don't apply it at the state level God I worry that that word won't feel right to you but um at that highest level that organizes a geographical reason region whatever we want to call that I'll call it a state or a government we're good with that part sure okay I it's it's it's not a location it's a relationship no I understand I'm I'm saying because I'm was trying to apply it there it never landed for you that that that I was saying the right thing in terms of your worldview right uh so don't apply it at that level because it's a relationship it's not a location uh that all the incredible things that have come to pass music fashion technology all of that which very much are Anarchist people come in they participate as they see fit well I wouldn't say technology because there was a lot of government involvement there but okay my bad set that aside uh so there are these groups of things music and fashion being two that named that are and Mathematics uh that over time people have contributed to nobody got to tell them how to contribute they just came in they did their thing and it either worked and people thusly adopted it or it didn't work and people ignored it right uh and so there was no one group saying yes or no that would be I just shout out to Eric Weinstein who's going to have a seizure right now because he thinks that physics has been co-opted but that's a whole another conversation uh so I get what you're saying there so now this becomes anarchism I believe you're saying becomes a thing that you do at that level that kind of level in your interaction with other people voluntary interactions whether it's creating a podcast building your own company whatever but it's going to exist inside of another structure that you believe is um invalid yes okay everything just has corrected my to my perspective anarchism is that alternative so for instance I know one thing we haven't talked about it yet but one thing that really drove a lot of my wanting to question is that you don't vote you don't believe people can vote their way out of the problems that we Face correct and I think although this part I'm not sure about you would tell people you're wasting your time voting and there's no point nope I don't believe in should I don't tell people what to do I didn't say should I said you're wasting your time well that means you shouldn't vote you didn't see the word should you implied it right so there's a lot of people who if they vote it perfectly I don't have a problem people wasting their time yep I have and if and I don't problem people delusional if you want to be delusional knock yourself out there are a lot of people where for them voting is like if you're an African-American and like your grandfather couldn't vote and now you want to go to the polls and it's going to mean something to you more power to you but is that just an emotional satisfaction to in and of itself if that's what it does for you great if I want to eat a candy bar that's fine but there's this view which is thankfully very strongly decreasing in America at least that we can't vote our way out of this and this idea which was promulgated among conservatives s did you say that people are believing that l yes they're believing it less that they can't okay they're more losing faith in voting correct correctly because for a long time especially on amongst conservatives it was because Democrats had um Congress for 40 years from 52 to 94 54 to 94 rather um there was this view okay we just got to vote in the right people and this is going to get fixed or better and they vote in the so-called right people it's like well they're really rhinos and they keep voting in the Republicans and it keep being somehow being rhinos at a certain point you realize that Republican party that you are so loyal to has never and will never shrink the size of the government well it's the democrat's fault okay there's no Universe even the one where they be Thanos where the Democratic party ceases to exist so you're dealing you call anarchism is called utopian there's this is a fantasy land that it's going to be hegemonic 100% Republicans and they're going to shrink down the government to the size of what the Constitution was so that I think is a very healthy thing this understanding that voting your way out of this you can't vote yourself free and you can't spend Yourself Rich um I think that is a big uh component I think people are starting to get that I'm not saying don't vote though because because again I'm not a contan people have this idea and I'm not saying you're sharing it at all which drives me crazy that if they're like well what if everyone thought like you so if everyone agreed with you wouldn't vote then you'd be completely destroyed if everyone thought like me we wouldn't any murders we would have any child abuse no robberies no theft very few rapes so that's not a concern it's good that's nice Uh I that is very interesting you don't want to what lie Fair thank you I appreciate that uh okay so going back to this idea that there are certain ideas that are better off for human flourishing and there are ideas that are worse off why not tell people hey if you're going to vote if you're going to vote vote for XYZ I don't know what their everyone individual's values are I don't know what voting is helping them accomplish and I I you can't vote this would make sense how if you're like okay Michael I need a dentist now this dentist might be more expensive but it's he's a better at it but you only have like a minor you know plaque this guy is cheaper but he's you know it's not as good these are two things to solve for right and you could see the as the pluses and minuses of each one your vote's immaterial like I can pick my dentist I can't pick my politician it my vote is of no statistical significance it's just a ritual and if people want to engage in rituals more power to them but this belief that if I vote for this guy I get this guy in no other context do we take this as acceptable the idea I go in the supermarket I'm like all right I want to buy this Cola let's have a poll it's bizarre it makes as much sense that my neighbors should have a determination of how much money money is stolen by the government as they should have determination over what music I listen to what clothing I wear uh what books I read it it or or some Aristocrat like if I don't care what Camila Parker BS has to say about my money why should I care about someone just because they're geographically approximate to me okay so would you like it if everybody were voting for all the cabinet positions you're running this because you actually know something about it you're running that because you know something about it would that give you the level of granularity where you'd be like yeah that makes sense to vote for and let's get individual fums by these different people no because you can't pick you're an entrepreneur you can't preemptively pick winners you can't just sit down and be like just I don't know I I if I had to bet money on if I was doing a protein bar company I would put my money in your uh um if I had like slots like I'd pick my money on you but that doesn't imply at all that there's someone out there right now who's going to completely outsell you and and run the table against you and I'm sure that's going to happen at some point that's just that's just how the market works the problem with picking winners preemptively is we all have very very finite knowledge and especially something politics everyone has their lives to live you got to have someone who's going to speak for you on abortion and environmentalism and Taxation and War it's like having your lawyer be your dentist and also be your account I don't I don't if what just proposed does not land for you I don't understand what you mean when you say that so you're what I hear you saying is you don't want one person in charge of all these disperate things they effectively know nothing about I I know what I'm saying is I'm not in a position and no one is to preemptively be like just because this person knows a certain amount of about protein bars that he should be in charge of this entire industry or that he was going to govern it toward the human flourishing as opposed to self being self-serving or looking out for his buddies or be extremely conservative and and fight Innovation because it's worked a certain way in the past therefore it's going to work their way in the future yeah it feels like either I'm not understanding your position as well as I thought it was or you're being inconsistent so uh you agreed that at the what I call the state level hopefully we have a working understand do you mean like literally like like the government or you mean like Texas yeah the at the government level okay so a nation state so that anarchism is going to live within that yes so now that we know this is not Utopia and anarchism as a mindset as an idea set that people can't adopt that will either move them towards human flourishing or move them away uh the reality is that we vote people into those positions so now when I go to a which I will say I use the word ought when I mean a moral obligation that there there is a more or less moral path so for instance I think people have a moral obligation to vote for freedom of speech speech and I think I read somewhere that you hate the word fre or the phrase freedom of speech you can certainly debate that uh I also think that people have a moral obligation but freedom of speech isn't on the ballot right if there was a referendum I could wrap my head around what you're saying cool then that's all I'm trying to get to I'm just trying to get to where you uh are operating within a system and you think that that system has outcomes that can be better or worse and therefore people my language ought to do something about it but doing something isn't voting don't you get it like the if I want to fight for freedom of speech the best thing I can do is Elon buying Twitter as opposed to me voting for a Republican or Democrat do something about it create a uh um system that is uh impermeable to attack from nefarious actors of which the government will always be the primary one you know how like apple made it so there's a pass that they can't even get into your iPhone even if the government asks for it that's what I'm talking about okay is this all predicated on your belief that the government is corrupt and no matter what you vote for you're going to get what you get regardless of what the populace tells the government they want the populace is not capable of wanting anything or telling anything uh there people say things you studied enough evolutionary psychology to understand that people say a certain things and what they say is of no relevance what matters is revealed values everyone will tell you they're a great mother everyone will tell you that they love their spouse I'm a terrible mother Mar are you I'm terrible well shut your mouth um people will will tell you with a straight face that their F monogamy even as they're cheating with their spouse the ability of human beings to compartmentalize and have cognitive dissonance without missing a beat is infinite and and this is well known within uh evolutionary psychology circles so people will most people do not have IND independent thoughts so they will this there's a reason why um cultural values are not homogeneous across nations in San Francisco there's going to be enormous social pressure to have left of center values and to bend the knee to those around you in if you're in tran you're going to be far more amable toward having radical Muslim views or or Muslim views as a whole so people's views the masses are not a function of this kind of Enlightenment nonsense where I sat down and I read all the great books and I've come to my conclusion independently that is not at all how people reach their views people want to pass and as HL Menin one of my great Heroes said the average man does not want to be free he simply wants to be safe and we saw that resoundingly uh during covid you know conservatives have this thing they've been saying at least since Nixon that there's this silent majority of these like hardcore minus and they hate the government and they just if that were true people would be campaigning on minarchism and no one is there it's a complete fallacy uh that people want this kind of sense of enormous responsibility over their own lives okay uh do you only have interest in speaking to individuals or do you think it is useful in moving people towards human flourishing to speak to people on mass I only speak to individuals okay but but the individuals have audiences yep so I like if I'm at a party like let's let's let's give it counter example and people want to start having a political discussion I'm not interested I will gladly have this conversation and there's an audience so I am speaking to people on mass but again that's just an example of how a hierarchy is inevitable you're not literally capable of talking to a group they you're only capable talking to a group either you're giving a speech maybe there's some questions but even when there's questions when the audience you're still speaking that individual people cannot speak as groups because you can't hear them uh people can't speak as groups uh people can't speak as groups I disagree with that but I think that's probably in a literal sense you can't because you they'll be yelling it's a it's a sure but you cast a vote you can get a sense you can get a sense through see there you go if I'm if I'm casting a vote I'm not speaking I'm delegating someone to speak for me that's my point that's your point say that in another way meaning if you're asking are you speaking for individuals or masses if I'm speaking to a senator I am speaking for an individual and ostensibly he has the masses behind him but that's not even true because even in that even the senator has 60% of the vote there's 40 people per of people who didn't vote for him and some of that 40 are going to like what he's doing at that moment and some of that 60 are going to hate what he's doing at that moment so you can only speak to individuals I'm not speaking to like the audience hears what we're saying y but they're not speaking to us in any literal sense even in the comments it's still going to be individuals saying things which some are very useful some are not yeah I think I'm playing with a slightly different idea so when two two well-intentioned intelligent people think the other person is crazy they have different base assumptions so life has taught me so I'm trying to figure out you and I believe something different about people or the world and I haven't yet figured out what it is my most recent guess was that you think you can sway the individual but that so many people that make up the collective are incapable and uned and I've heard you say they don't have souls and say that you're not kidding so even just pushing it all the way to some people just don't have the cognitive horsepower I think you would agree with sure uh to be a useful speaker on behalf of the masses they're never going to get the message nor are they going to be able to broadcast to elected officials what they want them to do right that doesn't make them bad people either I want to make that clear because the mouse traps are going off people yes that's I think very smart to say that I just want to make that really really clear if I am contributing value put food in the table for my kids I'm a a good dad who's there that is a heroically moral person right this lie which drives me crazy which is promulgated through our corporate media and through our government schooling system that everyone has to have an opinion on everything is completely fallacious and deranged feels like you're opening a new Ken of worms do you feel I've said something no but I mean this is something that's just you haven't said that at all but it's something that is so pervasive in our culture that when I go on shows and there some issue of the moment and the issues are kind of like one year it's going to Min skirts it's like fashion right you got to care about this transgender bathrooms what's your opinion we didn't care about it five minutes ago we're not care about five minutes from now but you this is the most important thing happening in America right now and if you as someone in our position who's just runs their mouth for living to some extent it's like you know what I haven't thought about there nuanced you have to have position to the point where they'll tell you you're lying if you or you don't want to say because you're going to alienate XY and Z it's it's Bonkers it's interesting I take a very different approach to that which is um I will think out loud about any topic okay and so I'll just I'll tell people look I don't know about this so there's in inevitably going to be Nuance I'm totally blind to that would radically change the conclusion of my thinking but just going from first principles here is how I would build this up so for instance when I was first asked about Israel Palestine I was like hey let's talk about something I couldn't know less about if I tried but I will just tell you that if the Palestinians don't believe in their children having a better future here on Earth than they're having you're going to have problems forever whether that's because it's a martyr thing and they're like oh my kids are better off dying in the here and now because they'll go to heaven that's way better or they're just like well Israel is making life miserable here and so my kids are going to have a worse life than I have so this is terrible in either of those reasons why they think that you've got a problem now that's not me proposing a solution beyond the ham-handed you have to find a way for them to care more about their which is what you see me that's what's amazing when people are happy like that's the solution it's like that's a handwave that's not a solution it's just like well the problem should be resolved yeah great thank you why I think that's valuable is I think everything starts with thinking up from first principles and so now it's like what what I want to do in my life is encounter people like you that give me a better ability to think through hard problems but I don't think you're the norm at all okay why does that matter I don't think people even capable of thinking in terms of RIS principles in fact they're they're violently opposed to it I mean if you look at movies from the 80s most people would be like you're eating raw fish and these same people now would tell you about the differences between uni and like the Hokkaido uni versus Saigon and I'm a foodie they had to be they don't think in terms of why do we eat this versus that and if a lot of people are eating this in in Japan maybe it's not going to make you throw up immediately right like maybe they know something you don't they don't think like that they just take what is in their culture as a given and never look further than that and that is is the default setting as my buddy Bridget fasy calls it like people leave with factory settings and they never even think for a second as you are doing well what's underneath this and what's underneath that they they really run away screaming from that kind of mindset okay so you've encountered that in your adult life and you've had a reaction you haven't I have and I'll tell you mine but I am far more interested in hearing yours um so once you realize that maybe at 12 maybe at 22 I have no idea when that occurred to okay so at 17 you realize oh my God these people are stuck on default factory settings they some of them have no soul your words yes uh and now what what do you do you took away from that is that when you found or started pursuing what led you to anarchism you're like I'm just going to deal at the individual levels things like fashion no it it was more like I didn't I went to Bucknell which is this country club School in Middle Pennsylvania which I would say is probably the worst mistake in my life was going there i' never met people like this before coming from Brooklyn um they are very bright very hardworking very intelligent and fundamentally Limited in their thinking and I didn't think this this grouping of characteristics was possible before and I would think okay maybe it's possible like an aberant individual but this was all of them uh almost 21 and it was funny do you know my I'm I'm guessing you know my other uh you know my John Durant no oh he does he does wild Ventures he I edited his book The Paleo Manifesto I saw that on your book list yeah he's great um he had a friend whose name I won't mention and it codified this mindset it was just like it's like holy crap I'm seeing In the Flesh because I we're playing a game called would you rather right if you played this game it's a fun game and I I don't remember what it was but was something like would you rather um lose a foot or be morbidly obese for the rest of your life and he goes goes neither give me some good choices and in his brain you have this kind of box that you work in and when you leave this framework it's just like weird and gross and it's the same kind of people who would be like that's like saying would I'd rather have the flu or cancer it's like you can't you don't know which to pick like you don't know it's the flu but because in their head if it's two bad things a preference is a desire preference is not if God forbid I found out some one of my friends has cancer I'm going to be like I hope it's melanoma not pancreatic I don't want my any of my friends to have cancer almost but if they do some deserve it I run with a different crowd than you if they do you certainly want the one that's curable but that's going in two directions and they can't handle that okay uh man this is very interesting so okay that was your takeaway when you realize some people have factory settings there's just nothing they can do yeah and they're violently opposed to being pushed out of them because it's weird and like what are you doing they they want to be in that very nice house and this is what your wife looks like this is what your music that you listen to this is what your house looks like it's it's very Stepford yes agreed we've encountered the same reality in life um my quick thumbnail sketch was I graduate from Film School start a business in building that business I end up in the inner cities all because I just want to tell stories and while I'm in the inner cities I don't know if I'm ever going to succeed so I'm just like I need to make this as good as possible and I'd come to realize that a wise way to live your life is to assume that your biggest dreams are never going to come true you're going to struggle with something every day so what would you do and love if you knew you were going to fail and so oh my God yeah we could have a whole thing about that yes oh that's awful no it's beautiful oh my God it is the most important question anybody can ask because then you live not the question the first part your dreams never going to come true yeah PE people should assume pursue it with everything you have but make sure you're pursuing something where it's not just about the having of it it's about the pursuing oh yes oh yeah oh yeah I agree completely yeah yeah it's not you die in the way to the the mountain you're 100% right you better enjoy mountain climbing as cimu put it maybe it's not about the happy ending maybe it's about the journey yes of course of course correct you're absolutely correct beautiful way to say so uh but I don't like that assume cuz you're telling them not to hope no I'm not anyway we'll go there because these are all utterly fascinating threads to pull on uh but just to finish this point so um because I am like I want to see these guys have an amazing life I'm going to teach you everything I know about entrepreneurship so you can control your life because to me entrepreneurship is just the ability to think from first principles and apply it to your real life can I add one thing please if Government schools cared about these inner city kids that's what they would be teaching them in day one because these kids have no resources but if they knew how the tax system worked how to start a business they'd have to hustle a lot of them how much better off with their lives be it's it's and a lot of them are highly intelligent but are trapped in these situations and the system is designed to keep them trapped in these situations you have just eloquently articulated the animating Spirit of my entire life yes so uh I'm there I'm teaching everybody anything they want to know literally I'm like I'll help you build a competitive nutrition company uh and what I found was that 98% of the people did nothing with those ideas 2% did but I had one guy who his life changed completely from encountering these ideas but he got in a fist fight with one of the other guys that I spent time teaching these ideas to for drum roll please starting to read so his friend quite literally punched him in the face said you've changed you've started reading and so in that moment something in my spirit broke and I was like I have to give up on adults and so what I realize is if you ever hear me talk talking to adults I'm simply the bat symbol in the sky and I'm just I'm throwing up things that I believe will make people's lives better but I I know that the vast majority of humanity are going to ignore these but the 2% that will hopefully say better I know remember I'm just trying to map your thinking no but I'm agreeing with you yeah yeah I'm trying to find where where are things exactly what I was saying yes so uh because I have to give up on adults and this is where we disconnect I have now pointed myself at doing entertainment for what I call the age of imprint or what is known as the age of imprint what the Japanese call Shonen which translates as the few years so it's from 11 to 15 when kids really start pushing back against their parents and they start drinking of culture so I'm like to your point if we are influenced by culture and I want to positively influence people's lives what I need to do is influence our culture and you started out by saying the only reason that people could possibly buy into the legitimacy of the state is because they're inculcated with that belief from the time there too or whatever yes and so I'm saying oh then that works amazing so don't mind me while I make comics and video games about empowering things that will make your life better buried in a story but like think Star Wars Empire Strikes Back like that's my jam right Yoda gave real life advice if you take Yoda's advice your life will actually be better Morpheus gives real life advice if you take his advice your life will be better but I'm like well then what that proves to me is that if you can inculcate them with dumb ideas then you should be able to inculcate them with good ideas that's not true and that really is heartbreaking well we've at least found where we disconnect one gr of poison is not the same as one gr of nutrition there's an asymmetry so just because like you can teach a penguin to swim you can't teach it to fly right so just because you can ruin a mind does not mean you can fix it keep going man but there's nothing else to say I mean when when you people have this is what I was talking about the 50-50 before we tend to whenever I in my brain have this my brain feeds me like the Symmetry I'm like whoa whoa whoa whoa hold on because it's not always like both sides are the same that that's something I think we all should be very careful about I'll use the word should in this context those us interested in ideas because it's a very common uh misstep to be like well you know both sides end up being identical even if they're maybe broadly identical you're going to have differences on a granular level and those differences might be very important wow okay that one cut but am I wrong no that's why it cuts okay yeah that is uh I find myself I will spend an inordinate amount of time when this interview is over rebuilding my emotional commitment to uh helping improve people because that's devastating and on its face true but think about this way like I've played enough role playing games I'm sure you have Final Fantasy right so snakes can bite you and give you Venom they can't bite you and give you healing right it only works in One Direction inflation is driving up prices like crazy so if you're a smart business owner you're looking for ways to cut cost so you can stay competitive and one solution that's helped over 37,000 companies do just that is net site by Oracle netsuite is the number one Cloud Financial system bringing accounting financial management inventory and HR into one platform and one source of Truth it reduces it costs and cuts the cost cost of maintaining multiple systems you improve efficiency by bringing all your major business processes into one platform slashing manual tasks and errors and giving you an edge over your competitors by popular demand netsuite has extended its one-of-a-kind flexible financing program for a few more weeks head to netsuite.com Theory right now netsuite.com Theory that's netsuite.com Theory that's sort of true so I I've asked myself over and over and over why is every virus or bacteria bad they're not all bad what stomach biomes yeah of course and so then you realize oh that just isn't true we're just aware of the ones that make us feel bad but there's no healing Venom from snakes there is no healing Venom from snakes however if you take the poison of an iasa plant and you do it just right supposedly though I've not done it uh it can help you anyway I'm just saying that there you you laid out a principle instead of me trying to chase down that analogy uh you laid out a principle that there is an inherent asymmetry between how easy it is to break a mind and how difficult it is to fill it with the right ideas life bears that out however life also Bears out all the beauty all the wonderment all the awe all the love and connections so again going back to my initial thesis that we're automat anyway I cannot stop myself from doing what I believe will make somebody's life better I literally can't stop myself even when it is uh stressful or overly taxing on myself okay um but I love it I love it and so that then leads me to this whole idea that ideas matter ideas may be the only thing that matter and what is the way in which I can contribute to giving people good ideas that will help them uh lead a more fulfilling life which is largely what I mean when I say human flourishing well that's great I I don't disagree with that okay so slotting into that framework it is I think the the point that we disagree and and when we're staring at it closely it doesn't feel like it's a big deal but then it echoes out to I think you and I do very different things is that sense of it's easy to break a mind it's hard to um get it going in the right direction but my entire worldview is predicated on and all of my actions are predicated on I can do that and so um I look at everything through the lens of efficacy and I have a few feeling that like every time I try to make anarchism make sense through the lens of efficacy of making people's lives better that's where we keep yeah I'm noty interesting uh first of all it I don't think of myself as having Maybe I'm Wrong as this is kind of get over yourself perspective that I have it's just like if I I was not put on the if I sat here and said with a straight face even if it were true you were put on this Earth to bring about an anarchist you know system it's like okay let's rain it in this kind of speaks to what you're saying about the dreams kind of you know being impossible but what I do know that I can say with a straight face that I've been put on this Earth so far is to create and tell stories and speak my truth um and that I think is and be entertaining in so far as I'm able that I think in many ways accomplishes what you are consciously trying out to do do you have a filter by which you decide what ideas you're going to pursue yes that's a great question so my legacy what I'm most concerned about to sound P be as pompous as possible is is not my podcast it's my books like I the books is something where if I'm gone this still going to be on a shelf so for me when I take on a project I want to be like this is something that should be said and no one is saying it and I'm going position to do so so that's what I look at when I pick on a project like a good example is when I did my book on North Korea um I knew there's no possibility of liberating North Korea through my minations what I knew I could do what I hope to do is all I want to do my very and I'm I'm sure you agree with this as well to have when you have finite achievable goals even that's why I tell people to go to the gym if you're seeing those numbers go up week to week it's such great motivation because you have indisputable concrete almost artistic proof that things are going in the right direction through your actions and that sense of I can make things better is intoxicating so my whole goal with that North Korea book was to there's a camera in North Korea there's this big clown Kim jangel ha haa look at this Carnival and all I wanted to do with my little finite clout is move that camera just a little bit because behind this clown like the Joker the Batman is a clown there just like the Joker there's a lot of bodies corpses children and I'm like just look behind him and then I I was instrumental in having that happen now no one thinks of North Korea as a joke but when this this before the book came out thanks in part to South Park and I'm not yelling at them because they at least brought attention to this country which no one even knew about but people like haha funny like what they do the arong they have these big festivals and they say these crazy things they dress in these badges now everyone everyone it's just a given that like my God like what a horrible place these poor people so having been part of the and I wasn't alone in this being able to move that needle and conversation that is just really something I feel very proud of at having accomplished why have you focused on North Korea and the rise and fall of the USSR why those two because I think there are a couple of things that Americans don't understand at least a couple of things and I was in a position to talk talk about Americans are still fundamentally naive about the nature of evil Americans I maybe westerners more broadly think evil is someone with a wacky mustache pounding a Podium talking in a crazy language they don't realize evil is that next door neighbor who will be delighted to turn you in and your family to the cops simply because it's going to make them feel important this never enters their head I wasn't even aware because when I was doing the white pill and learning about the secret police in these different countries I had been under the impression that it was things like I'm captive KGB takes me and they're like hey you know uh you can stay here for 20 years or you can confess that when you were at Tom's house you and Tom were plotting to kill Stalin so what's it going to be it's like oh yeah my he wouldn't shut up he he hates him they're like great just sign this and your you know what I mean like but what I learned is the stazi the East German secret police there was a woman um and who interviewed her for one of her books stazzy land he goes we didn't even have to pay them they were tripping over themselves to call us because they wanted to feel important they wanted to feel that they had something over somebody and that is so much more Sinister because any dictatorship you really need buyin from a lot of people because you're not you only have so many eyes and ears you need you need those snitches you need those those uh turn coats from the General populace and by empowering people's sense of I got something over somebody I'm big cuz he's small and I say this as a very small man that is something I don't think Americans get because Americans are fundamentally kind and and good nature never met a stranger kind of thing and it's like guys this is something that is not Universal so and also I I one of the reasons I wrote the white pill was so many people I know in the circles I travel in are convinced that it's a wrap the the West is done whatever reason they have at the moment it's over we can't possibly win and I'm like the good guys won from a far weaker position bloodlessly over a far more entrench or malevolent flow in our lifetimes and you guys don't know the story and you can't expect the New York Times to tell you because the blood's on their hands so I'm like I'm gonna do something about this and I did so did you write that because you thought once people understand this they will see it in others or they will see it in themselves or both in others I don't think my audience are I I I never even thought of that I I don't think there's very many people in my audience who are like ecstatic to be calling the cops on their neighbor for not wearing a mask it's interesting Jordan Peterson introduced me to an idea that has been profoundly useful in my life which is uh hey dear people that can hear the sound of my voice don't think of yourself as the one that would hide and Frank your attic think of yourself as the person who's the Nazi guard correct now you might be the Nazi guard that's like your your kid is 12 right no he's 14 no he's 12 right to make sure that they survive um but you still end up being the Nazi guard because you have a family and you've got to keep a roof over their head you're not necessarily himler but you end up as one of the bad guys and I was like whoa that is a profoundly useful exercise to keep me honest even if it's just to not be silent and so it was that idea that really got me CU originally my podcast was all just about um mindset and then Co hit and I started feeling like a coward because it was like oh God this BLM thing is kicking off and I feel weird about it but I don't want to say anything and like there were just a lot of things happening and I was like oh Jesus and so finally I was like o I don't like the way this makes me feel like a coward and I need to recognize you know what ran said do because I've read her book but please which book uh she I'm assuming you're G to quote uh God what's the big one the main one no this isn't from it's one of her interviews she said I'm not brave enough to be a coward so I think that was your position she you're like wait a minute if I keep my mouth shut the costs are going to wait the benefits yes yes even on an internal level on an internal level that was the thing I was most worried about I'm not brave enough to be a coward that's interesting I don't know that my brain can handle that but uh yeah so that really then did change the certainly the course of the show for better or worse but um okay so it is interesting to me that you didn't think that you would sway people from seeing that themselves because reading reading your book so I I often refer people to what I call the trifecta of evil it's a series of books I think everybody should read uh the gulag archipelago um red famine rise and fall of the Third Reich and when you sorry and Ma the untold story I'll put I'll put the red famine as a as a honorable mention and they're just brutal like it it's unrelenting yes and those really woke me up now that I've read the white pill I put it in that Pantheon oh my God holy [ __ ] wow well so I'll even push it farther I don't think most people will read the goog archipelago it's a thousand pages of a guy screaming at the top of his lungs about a level of inhumanity you just can't possibly imagine there's no payoff the white pill has a payoff the gag archipel you leave this you're like now what am I supposed to do interesting that wasn't my beef with the gulag archipelago it was just the the unrelenting density of the horror the screaming the I mean it was just like whoa this is hard and so as an experience is just hard so yours builds to a climax which I think is what you're getting to so you lay out all this horror and then it's like and you can do this um but your book feels like a um a more accessible version of the GG archipelago yes that was my one of my big goals so if I've achieved that I'm delighted to hear that very very very much so um so in doing that in writing that you just for you it's just as simple as don't forget no no no no no no no no but that book first of all as someone who's born in the Soviet you it is um it it's um I don't know if cathartic is the word but it's it's I think it's important for those of us who can to give testimony to those who have suffered and lost their lives and are being forgotten and I think it's if you have that power or at least for me to be like this this is important because something bad happens if we don't do that I don't I'm not even going as far as that just in and of itself when these people's lives were destroyed Millions for a long time and now it's almost being regarded as a kitchy joke so if I have the capacity as someone who tells stories to be like hold on a minute like these were families whose you know lives ma many many people they shouldn't be forgotten or certainly sneered at uh and I have the capacity to do something about that that's important to me with my value system I think it's also important that um so much of I one of things I hate as you've heard me say many times is cynicism which uh you know my great hero Albert Kimu fought with every fiber of his beinga and I do as well this idea of like what's the point it's so lazy like I'm sure can you I'm sure there's a parallel version of Tom that was like H there's already protein bars like what's the point we need another protein right it was so easy and I'm sure you all the time when there's pitches where people it's so easy to find reasons why this can't work you can never be an you know what I tell I I give networking talk sometimes and you've probably heard me give this advice I tell them I go if you want to be an author for example I go go to Barnes & Noble take a look around at all those shitty shitty books that could be you you could be that terrible author who's all their friends are like how did this get a book deal it's terrible this this is horrible but that could be you but when you put it in those terms all of a sudden The Impossible becomes oh okay I can be as bad as this you know horrible writer or the moment so I this sense of hopelessness I think is spread by Design because if you teach people especially the fighters that it's a lost cause you don't have to fire a shot You've Won they're going to go home you know unpack their weapons and just sit in front of the computer and you you've completely conquered them so that is something I wanted to Galvanize people to fight for their Liberties and to appreciate and also to give thank you to you know the people in these countries who fought you know insurmountable odds and who won and and and you know there there there's this veneration of war in the west which which I not just in the west which I understand because unless you regard as heroic how are you going to recruit people and sometimes war is necessary but isn't it so much better when you win peacefully isn't it so much better when there aren't millions of dead people and orphans and and you know widows when it's when the bad guys just go home and they're like you know what it's a wrap and just overnight things get freed that to me is the most beautiful thing uh and that beautiful story is not part of our um cultural vernacular so I'm like all right I like this is something more people need to know about how did the USSR break so bad so fast I mean this is that's the whole I mean I don't have a you I I just recommend you to go to white pill book.com and read that story I mean gradually you know it was a Hemingway who said how'd you go bankrupt two ways gradually then suddenly I think it's worth exploring so I'll lay out what I think happened but obviously you know this a lot better than I do you're spoiling the book the USSR breaks up yeah right spoiler alert happen back in the 90s everybody uh it and the reason this is one thing I can't tell if there's friction between us on or not but I really believe that if you introduce somebody to a better idea that they can actually steer their life and the lives of others in a better Direction yes I agree so I want people to read the white pill and gulg archipelago and about ma because I feel that we are moving in a more and more authoritarian Direction I think you've rightly said Canada has bigger problems than the us but I'm still super freaked out as a child of the 80s watching what's happening yes correct so anyway what seems like after reading all the books I've read with the most um special finger put on yours is that you you had a sequence of men who were so violent and so Sinister that people became terrified very fast and that earlier yes and that your earlier supposition that people don't want freedom they want security people realized they had to lie to get the security and so they would snitch they would make things up they would confess they would whatever they needed to do to protect themselves to protect their family and then uh in the interview with you and Jordan Peterson Jordan said something I thought was pretty interesting because it really shook my thinking of of why I ought to be afraid of uh totalitarian Rule and I've always thought that look this is a problem of doing something top down as soon as you have top top down authoritarian rule you're G to have a problem he said no that's not the problem the problem is that everybody begins lying and then it's all lies all the time everybody lies about everything everywhere always and so there's no trust in the society people don't say what they believe to be true and now all of a sudden you just get lost somewhere in this giant basket of lies and people are then able to manipulate you and essentially create any kind of vile state that they want and people just clam up because they're so afraid they're so Covetous of little moments of power they're Covetous of security and so it when you have Lenin take over with the bolik Revolution and then all the things that he promised freedom freedom of speech like all the stuff that he's going to give to the workers once they take over they take over and then he still doesn't give it to them and he realizes very quickly like we have to stamp this out with a level of we have to stamp out disent with a level of Cruelty that is truly unimaginable unless you read the book yes and so that desire for safety and brag about it brag about it tell me more brag about the brutality like they weren't like oh sh Shucks we got to kill these people they're like no no we want we want blood to flow like we're wiping we're going to liquidate the bushwa it's not just you know they're not going to be landlords anymore we're going to destroy these people as as a whole so leveraging people's Petty resentments well no just the idea that we're going to be we're going to be killing a lot of people why do people sign up for that because it's their it's their why do people sign up for hating the out group yes take the coocks right so that one I found shocking but then you're like yeah I get it you've got the better farmer is how I'll read kulok they better and you tell the working class hey these guys are aren't better peasants they're they're evil essentially they're rich cuz you're you're poor cuz they're rich exactly Rich yeah yeah rightow two horses exactly uh and so we're g to take away their stuff their unjustly earned stuff and so I get why the peasants are like yeah [ __ ] them and that's the the kind of mil I'm always on the lookout for where there's Petty resentments that you can take care of because otherwise I just don't know why people would sign up for we're going to go Smash and grab these people like you need that petty resentment I think well status people always want to humans are status seeking creatures and if this gives me an excuse that he's bad I'm good and the more I hate him the better I am well you've just weaponized me right and you think naturally people just take up to that yes I mean human beings Define themselves by opposition there was a book called The nurture assumption and she talks about how if you have a group of kids and adults the kids will perceive themselves as kids they're not adults right if the adults leave they become boys and girls because I'm not a boy I'm a girl I'm not a girl and boy so human beings Define themselves like what they are not and this so all this kind of Kumbaya you know we're we're all citizens of the world nonsense is completely impossible in practice because there's going to be someone I'm against I remember I was my friend was having a dinner party in in Brooklyn and it turned out everyone at the dinner table was either first or second generation immigrant so it was diverse in like the literal sense and I made since it was me I made us go around the table and say who do our people hate and there was this one girl I forget where she was from she's like oh we don't hate anybody I go who who's your neighbors and she goes oh we don't hate them we just think they're dumb so point being and now as Americans for the most part thankfully we can joke about these old like ancient grievances about you know and sometimes the Grievances are for a reason your your people slaughtered my people but when you're face to face with someone you know it's just like okay like I don't really hate you you I even saw this in North Korea where there was no perception from the guides that like as Americans we want to wish them any harm at all even though all their propaganda is understandably you know but for Kim Jong-un the US Imperials are going to come come down here and Slaughter you all so it's there was you know that was at least um something welcoming to see but but that sense of hatred of the of them is just part of the thing I want people to understand if I could take a one thing and just it's not anarchism it's that it's not that human beings are basically good or basically evil it's that they're basically animals and this distinction between humans and non-human animals is grossly overblown and if you want to understand politics don't read Hobs and lock watch the dog whisper and watch how those hierarchies and behaviors change and then many things will grow clear to your understanding it's so funny that you say that so uh my biggest breakthrough as an entrepreneur was from watching the dog whisper wow and I tell people that now I'm like yo you want to be an entrepreneur cuz I have one guy here who really wants to be like groomed he's worked with me since he was 17 he really wants to be groomed to be the next CEO I'm like all right bro you got to get on the dog can we use a different word than what groomed oh [ __ ] yeah he wants to he want to be he wants to be groom so I sent him to the dog whisper funny this is uh a word that uh has taking on a connotation uh yeah fair so anyway he wants to be trained he wants to learn how to be whatever words we want to use he wants to sit and be a good boy exactly yeah uh technically that is exactly what he needs to learn not to do but if he want to Be an Effective CEO but anyway I told him to watch the dog whisper and really understand that you can train people and people respond just like dogs do and when you see him so anyway I think it's absolutely punish bad behavior reward good behavior yep correct uh be predictable so that people know they going to get yes set your boundaries coherently and clearly yeah yep and then understand that they are a certain way so if you've got a dog that's super aggressive you can't just walk in and be like I'm going to dominate you even though that may be what you do down the road at first you just have to turn your back on them and you know walk in cautiously and protect yourself and and understand that sometimes people and dogs will do things that make no sense and instead of trying to figure out why I just realize you're dealing with an animal it's interesting I don't agree with that you don't think human beings are fundamentally deranged oo those are two very different things Define derange and I'll tell you whether I agree with it or not that human beings will often you know the Lord of the Flies right there's this idea for people don't know it's a bunch of kids on an island crash on an island and such a good book it's not because it's completely it's completely acious because it happened in real life and that's not what happened so what drives me crazy and you as a Storyteller can appreciate this people believe stories more than they believe reality oh for sure right so I've had people argue because Lord the Flies is again a story of a bunch of school kids they get crashed to Des Island they turn violent and tribal and start killing each other but this happened in real life there were a bunch of British school kids who crashed on a desert island and you know what they worked really well together and one kid broke his leg they didn't decapitate him they did his chores with him they set his leg human beings are not feral like we are capable of great violence but we're also capable of great Mutual Aid and the reason Survivor has to have these kind of voting out because if you put a bunch of people on a beach they would work together and and quite well and quite easily because human beings are um social animals but do you know pit Karen Island wait why do I know that name because it's the exact opposite of what you're talking about right now and it was a group of people that end up on an island and unfortunately they did not evenly distribute the women or one of them died or something and so it was just mass murder no no so I'm sorry once you introduce women Society is impossible so anyway point being people will argue with me that Lord of the Flies is real despite the fact that what happened to the kids is not but at the same time human beings if you think about any little scars you have on your hands little ticks think about the human brain right or little your mind people will do things that make no sense for any reason and unless you're prepared for these kind of wild card moments like or or or expect to be everything to be understandable you're going to be in for a rude awakening and I'm sure you've seen that happen many times with with with work where like some or something does things is like doesn't make any sense but like what can I do about it it's interesting so this may be purely definitional and we're saying the exact same thing just in slightly different ways uh I'm trying to convince people you're having a biological experience and what I'm saying is all of those people were moving towards pleasure and away from Pain and while I may not be able to predict why they did a thing I know 100% that they have either a secret belief hiding in their head or a known one that they just aren't saying out loud and they're moving towards that and if you can identify what really moves that person not what they say moves them but what actually moves them they will become far more predictable so my wife and I have used this in our marriage to tremendous effect where it's like hey when we were first in love and we felt like cocaine addicts and we were like could not get enough of each other we started saying this won't last it's awesome let's enjoy it but it's not going to last so we need to know how to cross that next Chasm which is this is going to mature into uh a very different relationship and so so we were able to do that well and then now as we've gotten older we're like hey remember the peak divorce for a couple is when the woman goes through menopause the kids leave the house so now the woman's like I've been taking care of everybody forever my estrogen just dropped and I don't give a [ __ ] about taking care of anybody anymore get the [ __ ] out and so my wife and I have been talking about that for a decade so now that we're edging up towards her being in per menopause we're like cool let's talk about it how are your hormones impacting you how do they make you feel so anyway the more you can map somebody out and you will get blindsided for sure but if you get blindsided and your punchline is humans are just unpredictable you're going to I think miss a trick you want to go oo interesting my map of that person and how they think was wrong yeah but you you you have you committed to making it work this is your wife I'm talking about if someone random at the office you know who's just has a screw loose like it's often not interesting it's often like okay this person is a crazy or what whatever the backstory is to their acting uh at least on a perceptual level as IR rational what would you do in that moment uh um first of all as as a Russian um and as someone who has a lot of experience in business I always come in with the assumption that what's my plan be if this person falls through so I'm never shocked or hurt or like whatever and I'm sure you've had to do this a lot it's like all right let's assume this false through what's my workaround so especially when I was starting out as an author I mean getting it you get a a client then you get a book proposal then you get a book deal I mean every step of the way the floor can come out from under you so you really have to be prepared for okay what's my what can I do to mitigate the damage here or just work around it so but if I'm dealing with someone and have you never this this idea that everyone's always seeking pleasure not pain have you never God help you had to deal with someone who's borderline uh yes I have and would you say that person is seeking pleasure or they're just seeking pain for everybody including themselves um they are seeking a state that appeals to them right okay I'll agree with that yes and so then my job is to figure out what state is it that appeals to them and do I have to quarantine them out of my life because it's a nonsensical state for me yes yes but I'm always trying to so you gave a definition of true I think earlier or real uh that I loved which is there there is truth in the world and that the thing that is true is hard to identify but there is a sort of tell all which is if I understand this truth correctly it will make a prediction and then when I run that test then the prediction will be validated if if that works out then I have the accurate model of the truth yes if it doesn't work out something in my mental model is broken and I need to update it that's right and so because like you I believe that we're just [ __ ] animals and that our psychology is very surprising at times certainly at the individual level oh yes uh and so I do an exercise where I'm like okay I'm a writer that's actually my primary identity and so if I were a writer and I were writing this person as a character what would need to be true in their internal life for them to act this way and completely and so then I'm like oh they'd have to think this or believe this or be going through this then it's like oh [ __ ] like maybe that really is it and so that has helped me navigate a lot now as a business person a lot of times I'm just like yeah like even though I can empathize and even though I'm writing you as a character and I can find out why he like this I can't have that in my business um so it isn't like I don't come to conclusions where this person isn't savable but they're I think they're again you have to know where you're trying to end up but they are very useful going back to my fetish with efficacy they're very useful ways to engage with somebody who just took you caught you off guard is acting in a weird way uh and sometimes the utility is I'm really going to invest in this person and find out why an otherwise high- performing employee just did something that I could see firing them just for this but first I want to understand and so that would be my approach to that which sounds very similar to yours I agree with every word you said yeah it's very having a Northstar and knowing what you're steering towards and then having tools and techniques to get you there are very interesting yes um okay so going back to the USSR and how they broke bad by basically lie lie lie lie lie uh seeking security over Freedom did Co feel like there were these parallels did you see flickers of the things that made the USSR so terrifying in the way the people responded to co I try to avoid making these comparisons at all costs because I remember vividly when Mike Bloomberg was governor excuse me mayor of New York City and he was Banning like big gulps at 7-Eleven and Mike Huckabee who had been governor of Arizona at the time Arkansas excuse me said oh it's just like North Korea if the worst thing about North Korea is if you think the problem with North Korea is they don't can't big gulps at they're 7-Eleven like really so I I think that because we are in many ways still so free in the west and when people make these kind of parallels I think we got to be very very careful and cautious uh these what goes wrong if you draw the parallel because if you have to dial because if you're in 2016 Trump is an as he was on the cover of the Daily News Antichrist literally Hitler the worst things ever happened to America that implies you can't get worse so what a historical example which is not g to you know have people flipping out is during World War I the Great War there was all this propaganda about Kaiser willhelm and the Germans the Hun and they're doing all these War atrocities I'm sure some of them were true some of them were true but it's like oh God so when Hitler comes along and there's all this stuff about what the Germans are doing the Nazis are doing many people in the west including reporters were like we heard this before this is just [ __ ] like you guys are just repeating the same old song but it was true this time you know the moral of the boy who cries wolf spoiler the wolf shows up so if you're if anyone is like you know Biden's I I you hear this all the time with conservative Biden's a communist is he like a communist like he thinks the government should control all industry he's not a puppet of Wall Street like what are you talking about um so I think any kind of comparisons between even a largely uh um free country and a totalitarian dictatorship like the USSR was I want to be very very cautious because that also feeds to the cynicism people are like how could I be happy in you know Nazi America I'm like really you can't at all like you can't listen to a song you like like that's impossible to you so but the one but but there is a commonality because the Soviet Union citizenry and the US citizenry and the North Korea cenry they're all human beings and again one of the big parallels between um the Soviet Union and the US and I think every other country on earth is the need or desire for a lot of people to get that pat in the head from those who are in power for doing what they're told even there's this book Jordan Peterson talks about all the time called Ordinary men where basically they took a bunch of cops in I think Poland and they just turned them into execution gangs and they're like go shoot those kids go shoot these old people in the head and they even told them listen if you're uncomfortable you can quit you're not G have a problem and no one ever said I'm having an issue shooting these kids in the head so the again the the dog whisper thing the um ability uh the what's that the mgrm experiment the desire and ability of so many people I think a large majority of people to be obedient and follow Authority a fedson one of the reasons why I think anarchism is true because this is just something that's inherently malevolent but also is something that is far more common than I think most people realize because again those people calling the secret police thought they were the good guys and they will think they're the good guys till the day they die yeah uh walk me through how that ends up being true so you've got uh Walter Durant saying hey everything here is great what are you talking about uh there was somebody else that you said went to their grave defending Stalin and this is long after the atrocities were laid bare what what's the psychological psychological principle playing out I I can't I don't know Walter danty so I can't speak to him specifically but broadly speaking um it's it's a quote ascribed to Upton Sinclair I think incorrectly that it's impossible to convince a man of something if his salary depends on it not being true so if people have proximity to power and their status is based on those people in power being in power for a reason it's very hard to tell them you know this guy's the devil right you know he's like killing a lot of his his people and you're basically shaking hands with this monster but I shook hands with him he doesn't have horns he's a nice guy he he he compliments me he reads my book things like this so you know the seduction of power is something I think many people tend to understand regards to their political persuasion um and it's something that's people who are kind of sociopathic or power striving understand how to weaponize you know very very well because here's another great example every politi I I don't know how many politicians say this I'm fighting for you who are you talking to and who are you fighting against not you like your the commercial is visible literally everybody so you got to be fighting somebody fighting for you you don't know me [ __ ] I don't know you I don't want to know you so you know things like this and um and the the but the other thing about you know the Soviet Union you asked how it fell is this speaks to another asymmetry because if you tell me a thousand truths and One Lie that lie is like a the dart at the balloon you know I think of you as a liar now especially if it's a big deal and if you've been my mom you know she's I would ask her about this growing with s un she goes you don't have to have any kind of understanding because if they tell you when you're a freshman that this guy was a great hero and two and a sophomore year he's an enemy of the people and then when you're junior right one again once again you know he's a great hero you realize they got to be lying at some point like this doesn't so these things they live in and we see this in the corporate media today very much people live in a natural present where they'll have these story lines and they the media stops talking about them and we just stop thinking about it a good example is social distancing if social distancing was there's your favorite word efficacious right why didn't they bring it back during the other waves and if it wasn't efficacious why did we do it to the begin with so you can have it both ways but no one even brings up that term anymore even though the stickers are still on the floor sometimes because it's because again we're in a Perpetual present we're not talking about Co anymore we're talking about whatever it is we're happen to be talking about at the moment and people don't sit back and be like wait a minute I've been bamboozled so one thing that I and one more thing sorry that just reminded me Caesar Milan always says dogs don't think they react when you understand that a lot of people live in a Perpetual present and unless that guy or woman on the screen whether it's a TV screen or computer screen tells them hey remember this it's literally literally as if it doesn't exist for them like if they're not hearing about it now it never happened it's never in their Consciousness on any level do you believe that the slippery slope that leads to that kind of um totalitarian nightmare is is inevitable is like the default place that people end up if they don't push back I don't think it's a slippery slope at all so this is a conservative claim that's not true no nation has other than perhaps Venezuela has gone from socialism to Communism it's always been a violent revolution it's not a thing all these these Scandinavian countries all these countri big welfare states Canada although it's increasing its totalitar now you had these leftist governments pull back as the state got too big and too cumbersome so it's not really a thing that it's it's like gr tunberg thinking like oh you know what government has increased this amount every year So eventually it's going to become you know totalitarian it's not inevitability at all uh nor do I think it's a slippery slope I think it's an Elevator Shaft I think a lot of times when the conditions are right the people in power know it they flick the switch and they're like all right it's totalitarian now so it's not this gradual process at all um but I am of course concerned but I'm hopeful because I do think technology is it's very hard to persuade an entire population of something that's not true if they even a significant percentage of them have access to free information because I don't have to show that you're TR true or false about this thing I just to show that you lie and once I've shown that you lie what are you going to do you can run your mouth all you want even when you're telling the truth this happened in Czechoslovakia this I love this story so during Czechoslovakia in uh The Velvet uh Revolution there was a rumor that went around cu the cops were beating protesters there a rumor going around that there was this student who was killed right and everyone's this was an escalation people were losing their minds the Communists found I forgot the guy's name it's in the white pill there was not one but two students with that name and they brought him out on TV they go no no he's fine but they didn't believe him but they were telling the truth in that instance and no one had been killed but because it had been years in years of Lies he like I'm not even listening to your [ __ ] anymore so that asymmetry between truth and lies is something one of the big Reasons I'm so hopeful for the future of America and the West because again it's not about fighting an individual battle for this issue or that issue where they don't care about the [ __ ] that they're saying at the moment even as they're saying it it's about once you demonstrate that these people are full of it and you they know they're full of it you tune them out and that's a very healthy step forward now do you feel like that's happened with the mainstream media I never use that term and I would encourage you not to use that term because I think a group group of depraved literal demons should not and cannot be regarded as mainstream okay um so I always refer to the corporate press or something else because they are ideological radicals and I'll tell anyone listening to this who you know if you had to have nine Supreme Court Justices would you rather have nine Democratic senators at random or nine members of The New York Times editorial board and very quickly unless you're malist people understand oh wait a minute I see what's going on here um what was your question I'm sorry I'm just trying to um better understand the setup that leads to this I think it's happening you asked if this happening more with the corporate press I think yes absolutely indisputably the by all measures uh people are far less trusting of media narratives than they were five or 10 years ago across all political biases okay so is that the asymmetry that you're talking about people now know this is just [ __ ] so now they're not going to fall for it anymore yes that's one thing you think is going in the right direction oh yes oh yes got it what are the because I don't know much about the Bolshevik Revolution my research has sort of picked up Lenin comes into power and then I have a reasonable grasp of what happened um what is the setup that people need to be worried about and I'm asking this question I and and you're really influencing my thinking but I have come into researching you with the sense of this is a slippery slope we are way headed down the wrong path and in some ways yes and there are things that where if if there is a setup it isn't a slipper slope but there's a setup that leads to the Elevator Shaft that we are increasingly acquiring those pieces on the chessboard that setup whatever that um setup is that leads to the and now we're circumstances are right we flipped the switch something feels off I can illustrate exactly what I think is off um but paint for me the picture I I know Germany very well in terms of what caused them to break bad uh into the Third Reich but I don't know what led to the Bolshevik Revolution well I mean I I don't think that's analogous at all because it was thear and then you had a weak Parliament and this was a country we had no history of democracy so there was no buyin to the Duma uh that it was legitimate and and you know you had a very dis it was very poor country it was very kind of uh uh you had no social Mobility it it was really you know even Marxist the idea that Russia would become cuz ISM had the idea that a country has to be industrialized first and then you kind of kill the factory owners and then you take over right whereas Russia is just as backwards you know agrarian joke so you know they lenon had to do a little tap dancing to kind of explain that away so I I don't think the parallels are there uh at all but I do think and I don't think American authoritarianism would look like despite you know a lot of conservative views because for decades the Soviet Union was the bad guys correctly that doesn't mean the bad guys now are going to be analogous to the Soviet Union I think you're seeing this kind of um it's much more maist in character uh and it's being spread through Corporate America this whole idea of like we're gonna have a group call and everyone's going to get up and say I'm a racist is a struggle session this is straight out of maoism um and one of my tweets that that I'm kind of proud of is Corporate America's done a far better job of promoting maoism than the Chinese Communist party ever D dream because capitalism is so efficient and if you think about it's it's it's kind of the case this idea of the struggle session for people don't know and this they have to do still in North Korea everyone the whole country every week you get up with your group whatever it is and you have to say what you did wrong that week and then people berate you for it and and you got the promise to do better and you're encouraged and North Korea you're mandated to look around your shoulder and turn in somebody else every week publicly and you so everyone's keeping everyone else responsible but it's this idea of like sounds familiar yeah it's collectivized guilt and and and collectivize responsibility everyone's responsible for everybody else so responsible everybody else um in terms of things I'm concerned about when governments have to be more authoritarian and start cracking down on things like they did in Canada with the truckers that's again Thomas Soul says there's no um Solutions there only trade-offs there's a big plus because one of the things Mar and I'm not saying the plus that weighs the negative by the way I'm just saying it exists one things Martin Luther King and I apologize for talking like a boomer for bringing him up one things Martin Luther King understood very well is that there were a lot of people who were racists and bigots who thought you know who don't like black people had whatever prejudices in their minds but who turned on the TV and saw men and women in suits being attacked by dogs and fire hoses and be like okay like I'm Prejudice but I don't take that quote out of context they said that they're prejudiced but I'm not for this like okay I've now not all of them but enough people were like all right this I've crossed the line so when you see things like authoritarianism being made public a lot of people who aren't who probably AIT often apolitical or you know moderate whatever they're like okay this is crossing a line that I'm uncomfortable with uh because you always want to if you're in power control through persuasion and the velvet glove instead of having to whip out the Baton because a lot of people are going to start getting antsy and be like whoa whoaa whoa something's up here uh with a naked display force it changes the energy in the room if you're me and you are having an argument even yelling argument as opposed to like you start punching me in the face these are very different situations right for sure for sure okay I want to see what you think about my sense of what the table has to look like or the chessboard just to [ __ ] pick one metaphor and stick with it uh what does the chessboard have to look like for people to be ready to flip that switch uh I think people have to be scared even if it's just economics so worried that I'm not going to be able to pay uh so Yar Germany hyperinflation oh my God what are we going to do there has to be resentment so there has to be enemy 100% And by the way if anybody wants to know what I'm cribbing off of I read uh minec conf that [ __ ] is crazy he literally just said here's how it works laying it all out uh but anyway they have to be scared there has to be heard the official book of quest bars is that true don't you dare Michael M this is where people clip [ __ ] out of contg to remind everybody I'm no longer at Quest Nutrition and I read uh his book not so that I could get good at doing it so I could get good at detecting when it was happening clear let's be very it is not the official [ __ ] my unofficial got it you yes it's your struggle boys strg my struggle session uh so okay anyway uh they have to be afraid there has to be an outgroup and then there have to be these big Promises of this thing is going to be the thing that saves you and in all of that is like look it's just temporary and we're just reacting to these very bad people and so even in that they had to now wasn't this is just temporary well we can get into ma that's good you're going to force me to check my own uh beliefs because I've actually spent more time with ma uh but they even needed like there to be that one sort of final thing and that was they themselves burn down a really important building and said that the opposition did it and see now we have to go do this very bad thing and I think that's what trigger Crystal knocked right if I'm remembering correctly so uh the Nazis are like hey you guys are all terrified um there's this group that's causing you a problem that group just did a bad thing uh we're going to take over with Force but don't worry this is all for your own good and then by the way they actually really delivered results and they stabilized the currency and got things moving in a much better Direction Why does that make you quest bars the delivered results stop it's on the bar just read it what you creating problems for other people that's the worst part like you're trying to troll me but it's gonna I don't own the company anymore anyway uh God so that is I think the the rough setup on the board and so when I'm viewing what's going there's one thing you're missing I really want to reject it has to be a binary give it to me you're either an us or you're a them okay they have to always set that up you you they so you're forcing people to choose so you sure you want to not be with us cuz you're going to be with them is that what you want that's partly I think very important to point out because that's one of the things that I see happening now so I have been an apolitical animal my entire life and it's only been again I think we talked about this off camera where I realized oh wait I during Co I didn't understand money printing there were people I wanted to help uh you start peeling back that onion of just trying to help people with their money run into money printing which then takes you into what the hell is the fed and it just becomes this whole rat nness of like whoa the world is not at all what I thought it the world doesn't work the way that I thought it worked right no the world doesn't work the way you were told it works too that is for sure and so that becomes this whole thing okay so now I can see the increasing Division division division division just like hyper radicalized and that strikes me as a very bad idea one of the things that I'm trying to do in my very small way with my channel is just show people even if I don't agree with somebody first I need to understand say their position in a way they would recognize and it's like okay cool we can figure out where we agree where we disagree and then um I'm always trying to move towards okay what can we do that leads to human flourishing uh but going back to the pieces that have to be set the binary that's super helpful but I see some of these pieces getting put in place oh yes and the big one was covid where people realized oh just keep me safe and so once I saw how thin the veneer was of like I'm willing to do a lot of crazy things just to keep myself safe um that really unnerved me about how close we are like I want to put together a totalitarian clock that says how close we are and I've thought about doing a gimmick and asking all my guests like how close are we to that I want to make that the whole thing that I'm talking about but that to me is a a really interesting question like how close like the atomic clock how close do people think we are to Annihilation but I'm going to point something out which people in this space often forget if you went back to 2021 and people who had this perception that you do which is not Incorrect and you asked them in 2024 will there still be vaccine passports will there still be masks 90% of the people said yes so they didn't resend those things because they're nice or started caring about Freedom all of a sudden or realized oops we made a mistake at a certain point these things have a cost and at a certain point you run out of the ability to pay those costs dollars or political political willpower and social you know manipulation points okay that makes sense uh and you say that to remind people that if they speak up it's obviously not voting if if just to remind people that if you assume that whatever bad thing is currently happening is going to be there in perpetuity here's an very obvious counter example if you asked yourself a few years ago and you would have been certain we're always going to have vaccine mandates we're always going to have be wearing masks and would people be misunderstanding you to also hearing that someone somewhere has to speak up to make the political cost untenable I think speaking up is a bad way of inflicting pain I think there has to be a cost and like me talking to the manager is one mechanism but it's not an efficacious one so it could be as much what probably ended up happening in certain cases is some powerful person call their governor Congressman are like this is costing the hotel industry or this is costing the airplane industry and they're like we're not going to give you money for re-election or whatever like that they had to have personal consequences for it and when those leaders have personal consequences very quickly uh they start changing their tune just out of curiosity to find the edges of my understanding of you if you saw somebody who was like I really feel like I want to go speak out and make a lot of noise obviously you'd say yeah cool if that's how you want to spend your time I'm here for it but would you say Ah that's actually good that some people do that yes very much so okay very much so yes okay got it and also I would encourage them figure out what works don't be self-indulgent about it what makes you be persuasive what what are you what do you have to say that no one else is saying just like with a your a product it's like okay there's this you know the great thing about entrepreneurs as you know I was a business major is they see that space in the Shelf that's empty that no one else sees like wait a minute this is a hole in the market same thing with politics you're like wait a minute no one is saying this I can point this out to people that's how you get ahead very interesting okay uh ma I'm missing a piece in thinking that my breakdown of because this whole thing about this is just temporary I think with now if I could be wrong um but I just read some books on him fairly recently the idea was this is permanent we're overthrowing you know the landlord class and we're bringing kind of this heaven on Earth so sure some of the measur might have been temporary but in terms of the structure and you know they do have this perpet this kind of Heaven is a place on Earth you a few few Generations down the road which never seems to come but it wasn't like Lenin where it's like this is war communism we have to fight the Russian Civil War you know uh freedom of speech is a bgea you know contrivance that we can have you know once we kind of are free from our enemies I think with ma is a little bit different it's interesting there may be a distinction in there that's important when I look at it he definitely had moments like with the starvation where it was like hey this is temporary his own daughtering stuff and he was like no no no look you need to suffer along with everybody else this isn't going to be forever everything's going to be fine uh same with the um cultural revolution where it's like oh we're just going to destroy this real fast and then like we're going to get moving in a good direction um but I haven't looked closely enough at Mao in terms of his language of whether this is like the permanent State of Affairs or if that's sort of exactly the same of the revolution has to happen and the outcome is going to be forever but the revolution I don't know if you use that similar War language or I I know from North Korea they basically talk about Revolution as being a Perpetual thing and they actually what's really great about North Korea which I was surprised to learn is that they address all the Western criticism so I was like oh okay um so one their books talks about like when westerners hear Revolution they think like murder and War Warfare constantly what we mean and they're talking about sides of their mouth is this Perpetual cultural motion to making things better better uh you know so it it's it has a positive connotation for them do they ever Define what the better is that they're moving towards yes it's you know uh the houses with blue tiles they specifically fetishize that like when the great leader kiml Sun everyone's gonna have blue til houses so it's it's it's it's exact it's it's it's very bgea it's going to be more education better jobs health care food no one goes hungry everyone has contributes to the society everyone's taken care of you know you orphans are Kings in this country you know that sort of thing would the average citizen in North Korea have the same grocery store moment that I forget which Russian leader it was that saw it uh so North Korea doesn't really have an average because they have something called sun buun which is everyone has a cast and this cast determines where you could you don't have internal migration you can't leave your village without permission right so unless you have a very high social status which means your whole family they interview your whole family you're not allowed to step foot in Pyongyang the capital city which is reported to be the most beautiful thing on earth I assure you spoil her it is not so I've met refugees who are like oh what's Pyongyang like because they have never been allowed to step foot in it so um there is an in this also speaks to the a symmetry between truth and lies North Koreans used to sing a song this this the title of a very important book by Barbara Deming North Korean called the world envies us and now this an understanding of yeah we're poor but we work together and we're working together for a better country so they've had to to adjust their propaganda as more and more North Koreans even in rural areas were aware of uh we're not don't have more food than everybody else that's completely not true how long do you think that they can keep going like this well what do you mean like this uh so great question I have a base assumption that their population is still starving no hungry yeah okay you make that distinction because they can stay at that level of hunger no I made ation because 10% of the population starve to death during the 90s and that's not currently happening so they actually had a mini genocide and uh they didn't let food come in to feed the population whoa okay whoa uh that's head moment yeah that's less than ideal uh that's not very efficacious yeah not not in the slightest Mr mice okay so interesting um when I look at Russia or the USSR excuse me when I look at the USSR that feels like an idea where it just couldn't sustain it was just getting so bad that it ultimately sort of crumbled under its own weight when Stalin died no that that's not first of all they didn't crumble its own weight when Stalin died that was St died what 53 so it had another 40 years so this this kind of horoscope idea of like well this the the USSR is definitely going to collapse at some point well everything collapsed at some point you don't think things immediately started to change but they start to change but my point is North Korea had something similar and instead of uh it being allowed to kind of break up they chose to double down and and let millions of people starve so when the Soviet Union collapsed it didn't have to collapse as it did it could have collapsed with more totalitarianism and more murder and and widespread famine okay uh what I'm saying is though literally some months I believe after Stalin died uh I forget again the name of the person that gave the speech but he gave the secret speech about look we all have to be honest terrible yes and by the way just I have to interrupt because they're gerain people can watch an AI reconstruction in English of him giving this speech because there is the transcripts yes who and I watched it and I brought tears it brought tears to my eyes because what you're hearing and for people who read the white book white pill are familiar with Soviet history for for decades you know one of the things I have receipts about in the book is so many people in the west were like this is all anti-communist propaganda they have food they can read whatever books they want you guys are just Prejudice this is just the capitalist newspapers you know spreading lies about the good natured Soviet Union and Stalin's awesome he helped us kick Hitler's ass how can you say anything bad about him blah blah blah and then his successor kushev sitting in Solin seat literally gets up in the middle of the night and delivers this secret speech and is like it was all true these people were tortured uh these like this he just goes through the names he goes this one was accused of being an enemy of the state was based on no like he just goes through name after name after name like at this Congress there were 1100 delegates a thousand of them were arrested and murdered how is this even possible that if we could have a country if that percent of the governing bodies were all you know enemies of the state and you can only imagine how sitting in that room to hear Stalin's successor be like all the stuff they were saying is true we did these unconscionable monstrosities against our own people and it's just this beautiful moment uh historically so to hear it in in reconstruction of his voice in English is just so amazing and you don't think that the things were set in Motion in that moment that led to oh LED to what led to the downfall of the USSR oh it certainly contributed what I'm saying is downfall is one of those words that could have a you know you got to stick the landing right A lot of these countries when they downfall look at Libya there's the downfall of Gaddafi is it really some kind of you know is Libya today anywhere similar to like Lithuania today I don't I don't think you could make that case and so what was it that happened that made it made them stick The Landing gorbachov I I think he was one of the greatest people who ever lived and to me one of what is a great example of beauty you know people ask what is beauty right um when I was reading the writing the book and one things I researched is there was time after time you know Hungary tried to uh um you know had revolted for 13 days against communism The Velvet uh the um Prague spring in 1968 the Czechs tried to do it as well and you know the Russians and the East Germans everybody the Russians are sending the tanks and come the late 80s early 990s you know gorbachov was the first uh Soviet leader to be born After the Revolution he lost his family members to Stalin and Stalin's purges um and he saw what that did to you know his own family and Country after country this is again tenman Square was June uh um June 4th 1989 right so this is during his Reign country after is that today yeah oh wow crazy how fortuitous wow okay okay huh um and chesu from Romania Haner from East Germany as these count as the people are rising up in these countries calls up gorbachov and they say truthfully you have to send in the tent s if you don't send in the tanks it's all going to go to [ __ ] and he goes nope I'm not sending in the tanks and there's this great moment that I learned about during this book where you know one of the big concerns of the Cold War is the US and USSR had all these missiles pointing at each other you know Mutual assure destruction you know and Reagan comes in in 81 and he's like okay like this shit's got to stop like we are have the capacity to destroy life on Earth I can't have this on my wife watch and what's amazing is independently Reagan got taken down to the bunker and walk through the rehearsal of a nuclear war and what he'd have to do and he's like so I press this button and like millions of Russians are killed in seconds they're like yep he's like yeah okay and his AIDS were like he wouldn't he wouldn't retaliate and what's even more amazing is gorbachov got taken down to his bunker walked through the dress rehearsal and he said explicitly I'm not pressing button even in a simulation if they're going to fire we're not firing back I'm not going to have the death of millions of people on my hands I don't care so but they neither of them knew the other thought this so you had this amazing poker game where this hardcore anti-communist Ronald Reagan who's head of the Screen Actors Guild who rooted out communism in in Hollywood was a total Dove when it came to the idea of nuclear war so they had this big Bluff and you know both were on the same side and then you thater you know in the Middle where Reagan was talking to gorbachov about destroying all nuclear weapons and she's like you've lost her mind she's like you can't uninvent something she goes how do you know gorbachov wouldn't cheat I would cheat so it's this great moment of you know Thatcher being in the middle and being this kind of uh uh realist when it came to politics but between the three of them you know you massively uh decreased the nuclear threat worldwide and you massively liberated you know half the world without a shot being fired and it was very important that they had this relationship so that he knew that if things liberalized uh the West wouldn't in many ways take advantage of the situation as they've been warned yeah it's a a pretty amazing thing I assume the reason that you think gorbachov was one of the greatest people of all time because in that moment he could have tightened the grip of power if you're a powerful person with your finger on the trigger and you take your finger off the trigger that to me is greatness whatever happened to him well he died fairly recently really yeah he just lived a nice quiet Li somewhere in Russia no they hated him after a while that that's that's kind of the sequel I was actually in talks to interview him and I would have kissed his feet literally but then Co hit and he was like 80 something he was living in San Francisco what yeah gorbachov lived in America oh yeah they they drove him out because because of him the the C country went to [ __ ] it fell apart right so the the transition was not easy for a lot of people it was it became this kind of gangster regime it was still better although it was hardly ideal wow that's interesting I did not know that he ended up in the US he used to do Pizza Hut commercials happening that that was during the 80s though I'm now in like an alternate timeline what do they call that the Mandela effect this is a Mandela effect there's no way that gorbachov did pizza commercials and as I think we're gonna need to pull that up I think as head of the Soviet Union I need to see if that's real gorbachov Pizza H commercials that seems impossible that is crazy let's see we're about to find out if if we can spell gorbachov there it's the second result automatic right right there oh was 97 I was wrong this is way after wow I am scandalized by two things one that we have an account that shows commercials while we're trying to watch the show and then two M tight these days huh actually actually did a pizza Commercial whoa wow my how things Chang but this is Pizza Hut in Russia the ads are here it's just staged yeah it's not a Pizza Hut ad for Russians it's for it's subtitles for Americans This did not make my radar at all wow that's amazing well God bless it all right you can stop it that uh that's that was me crazy yeah I bet that is uh that's very fascinating yeah okay so what do all this history feels like a Prelude obviously for now I don't like that because sometimes the story is its own thing do you know what I mean not everything has to have contemporary relevance yes I agree with that but is not I if you're going to try to make sense to the world today should you not you sure yes yeah that's fair I'm just saying deeply of historical okay so uh I look at the current moment I already get a sense that you think people are overblowing this and this is the boyo cried wolf no no but the boyed wolf the wolf shows up yes so is The Wolf on its way oh yes I mean we should absolutely be concerned about the wolf showing up but my point is it's not a given the wolf's going to show up and it's not a given that if the boy knows the wolf showing up why is he getting a she sheep dog or a gun so what's the in as we race towards the 2024 election what's the sheep dog what's the gun the I think this 2024 election is a complete misdirection in the sense that I promise everyone listening to this that if Biden has another term it's not the end of America we've been hearing this every four years if this democrat's elected it's the end of America I also don't think if Trump is elected it's going to be the end of America but I think people need to think more long term Washington can only solve cause problems it cannot provide Solutions and I think there is I don't know that I would advice per se but I think social media is organically doing the Lion Share of delegitimizing corporate media and government and that is something I am extremely um grateful for and enthusiastic about that makes a lot of sense is is it just a function of an alternative or do you think they're actually proposing ideas that are useful well I I what do you mean I'm sorry in the alternative Medias or any anything coming out that you think is actually useful or is it just that there is an outlet that Twitter exists or X now I don't know that they proposing other than like Bitcoin which I'm very big fan of I don't know they're proposing Outlets per se so much of an understanding of you don't have to accept the system as a given and you also this idea that this vote every four years is determinative of everything that happens in your life is completely fallacious and you know this mechanism certainly that the Republican party is going to be means of your salvation or Trump personally is really uh uh I think people have dropped a lot even though a lot of people on the right will say they infinitely pursue prefer Trump to Biden they are not going to think okay if we get them in you know everything's a wrap they they they they understand that the swamp's not getting drained in four years agreed but if people perception is reality so people believe that their vote matters and that the election is being influenced they probably wouldn't use that word they probably use something stronger but being influenced by all the political law fair that Trump has been targeted unfairly I mean there are a huge number of people believe that yes and so I one of the things on my bingo card is uh enough people go uh he's a felon I can't elect him right all they needed was the mug shot right now Trump loses and people go he didn't get the votes I'm not even arguing that but he didn't get the votes because these people wrongfully targeted him with uh political laware we're a Banana Republic this is all a farce and some level of violence maybe just 2020 sort of Street Riot level uh but maybe more there is some level of reaction that I love all of that up to the violence so yes what is this is the first time in our lifetimes where whoever wins the election I think the other team will not regard it as legitimate I think if Hillary won in 2016 the Republicans would be like all right we knew Trump wasn't going to win like they pulled out all the stops like we we shot we swung for the fences we didn't get it they'd be understanding I hate her you know but this is how politics work this kind of like what do we expect uh in 2020 I think if Trump got in the if Trump got in again uh I don't I think the Democrats would think he's illegitimate in the sense of like in 2016 but not in the same way that he stole it right like this guy doesn't have a right to be president it's kind of more their mindset this year I think if Biden wins they will say it was stolen and all this lawfare and if Trump wins I think it'll be like this is completely Beyond The Pale he's a felon these people don't believe in the same country we do like we can't sit down and have discussion anymore so we are reaching a kind of political breaking point which I am very in favor of and I am very hopeful about okay talk to me about a national divorce why are you hopeful I don't think I don't I wasn't referring to National divorce my comment just now uh I'm just you refering I'm just referring to this idea of a mass disbelief in the legitimacy of Elections and government because it's really he said we can't sit down and talk to each other anymore meaning the point being that if you think this system is unsalvageable then you come to my way of thinking that there's no point in sitting down and talking because these talks aren't being done in good faith uh my opponents don't value my life at all or they see see the world in ways that are so fundamentally opposed to my own that there's really no point in talking because even best intentions we going to be talking past each other and once you have enough of a population who thinks this prohibition is a good example if you have enough people who are like this is just [ __ ] and we talk about it this just makes no sense and I'm not for it then people just ignore uh enough of the population ignores the law and does what they decide is the right thing to do and then it gets harder and harder to maintain the sort of for my view illegitimate nation state H okay uh so let me see if I understand that uh in practice so you like that we are having uh contention between the two sides that they both view this moment is just so catastrophically ridiculous that this whole thing is rigged they'll use maybe different words but it's it's illegitimate this process is completely broken and now by default they're all either at your position or closer to your position and you guys now can at least have a discussion about okay how do we respond to this and the way that we respond to this is it will just be completely organic from the ground up people will start saying uh this law being imposed upon me is completely asine and I feel that way because uh if I'm a republican I'm just any in the Democrats in office I'm just be like nope I'm not gonna do that so I don't know if this one C is another example yeah perfect I was going to say the border so uh you've got the governor of Texas saying I don't care that you want to let people in I'm going to lay razor wire and and everybody can just deal with it uh and you think that there'll be so many of those little things that it weakens the power of the state as we recognize it today yes I wouldn't say um completely organic I'd say largely organic but other than that yes everything you just said yes okay what part won't be organic because I think there's going to be astroturfing and there's going to be people uh manipulating and not using this word in negative sense uh sentiment influencers uh pushing people to become you know more radicalized and less like let's sit down and figure this out okay in your sort of playing out the war games of all of this is there a positive feedback loop that you grow concerned about that could push beyond what you're comfortable with or yes because I think violence sings its own song and once things start getting violent this idea that it's just going to end nicely almost never happens it certainly does not happen in in the short term it's going to be you know a lot of bad things almost always so I'm very concerned uh this this you know this whole talk of January 6 being an Insurrection it's talk about the boy K wolf like if you think this is as bad as you know the right can get like you need to study your history because if they popped off it would not be symmetrical to 2020 if you had a bunch of right-wingers who have guns who really want to take matters into their own hands it's not going to be pretty you know for the people at CBS and they should be very careful of edging people toward that goal but you don't see anything in the setup to 2024 that leads to that response I see a lot my point is this is what I'm talking about with kind of like sticking the landing like I am glad that there is this growing contempt uh for the state and its legitimacy I'm concerned though that it's like whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa like let's not like things have their own momentum uh and that's when things can get out of hand in a very bad way who would be our gorbachov In This Moment who would be the the Lynch pin guy that if they break One Way Or Break the other way then it determines to be the President right or to me it's I put Trump at the center of all this whether he wins or loses it will come down to how he responds if he loses and he's like hey look this was law fair horrific they never should have done it however everybody this don't break into violence there's a better way to handle this I brought Michael Mouse on my uh alternate uh cabinet to talk about a Way Forward for you guys so that you don't have to be under the Yoke of this illegitimate government but at the same time I want to be just expressly committed to a nonviolent Rebellion against this farce whatever or if he wins being a uniter and having the moment like at the end of the Civil War where instead of um telling his people to go home and become Rebels and be um do gorilla Warfare tactics I think it was Lee uh said look we lost we lost fair and square everybody pack up go home go back to your normal life and had he in that moment encouraged them and said this is illegitimate the north should never be recognized go home and be guilla Fighters it would have been a very different post Civil War reunion but they did have Guerilla Fighters they have the clan yes do you think that Lee's um request that they all go home and and peacefully reassimilate had an impact or it did but it was a finite impact right and and I don't I think I I if my political opponents here's the thing with regarding Trump which I think I would guess literally like 70% of people would agree with what I'm about to say I think he did it he paid her off and it's ridiculous to think of putting someone in jail for this and if this was anyone else other than Trump no one would be advocating for this person at his age to be put in prison that would not be a thing um so I don't see how he can say someone who's known for like uh um kind of speaking his truth and you know can say to his people yeah they try to put me or they succeed in putting me in jail but you should validate them I don't see how that that I don't even if he said those words it's going to be on deaf ears or they're going to think okay he's being has a guntis said he's being forced to say these things which would not be inaccurate okay then help me understand why you don't think this escalates to something deeply problematic to escalates the violence just I am very concerned about that I'm not that's that I very concerned that's my concern period yeah no and we should do this I don't really have a um I think one of the costs of when you have an elite population who have spent Century manipulating and lying to the populace at a certain point people's just tune them out so I don't know what happens then I think the other the the the counter to that is I think people on both sides broadly speaking the right and the left are very heavily law-abiding you know even the people who are causing carage during 2020 were still a small part of the population and they were allowed to do this because the police were were happy to stand down so I think if violence broke out it wouldn't necessarily be allowed to play out as much because it didn't serve a political purpose um but I think I don't think the right is as close to popping off as I fear in my you know worst moments what makes you think that and you're more so moments it's not really kind of um it's not kind of in this in these bubbling under conversations you know what I mean they don't really it's no one's organizing militias no one's kind of mustering all this other stuff that it's not really so for that to happen it would really look differently it wouldn't be just this kind of overnight people are burning down cities it would be much more targeted and and I don't see that being uh uh happening and if it is I think they're being infiltrated by the feds but and not without without cause right uh if Trump is sentenced to jail time which I think is gon to H when's this going to air uh probably in the next two weeks okay he's getting sent on July 11th so before he before the before he airs for sure or before this will air before he sentenced yes I think he's going to jail don't you I honestly haven't looked closely enough at this I don't know I I think there's every incentive for them to put so they want him to that is I think the judge was going to say go to jail and then I don't know how I'm not attorney but I think you have an immediate appeal and it's going to go to the Supreme Court very quickly um and I think you know even the lefties on the Supreme Court are you know there was all this talk about this happened about kicking him off the ballot and I said I bet you this gets overturned by the Supreme Court and I bet it's gonna be 90 and all these conservatives like oh my God you're crazy even the Dei hire even the Dei hire she's still a judge with the great reputation who knows the law it was 90 you can't just kick someone off a ballot so I think if it gets the Supreme Court which it inevitably will I think they'll be extremely reticent to send a president to prison um especially during a campaign season they don't like that they they don't like upsetting the appart yeah um Do You Feel Like We are in and you might not necessarily uh be bothered by this but do you feel like we're in Banana Republic territory where it's just like political law fair not yet but it's getting there I mean well when the president's wife starts running for president that's Banana Republic territory um so that's kind of it's it's very kind of incestuous situations that the Brazil court with Christina kersner who and and Eva Peron and all this other [ __ ] uh in Argentina um I think we got a ways to go I think here's another example of why we're not in Banana Republic territory eminent domain eminent domain is do you know about this no that's amazing okay see this is this is if the corporate press cared about people being informed this would be oneon-one stuff eminent domain means if I think you Tom are a drug dealer I can go to your house as the cops seize your bank accounts your car whatever you use to further your drug deal and then you who's now broken car lists have to fight back and prove to the contrary it's not this system of um uh uh you know you were found guilty and blah blah blah as a result of this cops steal more from people than our burglaries and robberies combined this they recently broke this this uh um barrier very great accomplishment for them and of course they have a huge incentive to take those Ferraris and Corvettes and houses because they get to sell it off and they keep the proceeds for pennies on the dollar state byst state have started limiting the no that's not eminent domain I'm talking about asset forfeit I'm sorry eminent domain something completely different yeah emminent domain take that take the house yes holy crap I need another do wow I really didn't understand this holy [ __ ] eminent okay eminent domain is the idea that if I want to build a highway I can take Tom's house and put a highway through it separate issue asset forture is Tom's a drug dealer I think I'm a cop I can take all his property and then it's presumptively guilty and you have to fight back and and prove your innocence to get it back so it's completely asymmetrical to you know normal jurist Prudence right and as a result of this cops take more than all other robberies combined but state after State now is limiting this so that is a sign that we're not in a Banana Republic territory because Banana Republic is basically the cops decide whereever the laws at a given moment and you have no kind of property property rights or rights in your property your own person uh uh to be safe from the police but you don't think that voting had any influence on that it did have some I'm just saying the ability of any individual to impa it's it's the vote has less impact than that person who has the politicians ear so that vote you as a voter will have much less impact than me as a real estate realtor being like hey or me as a donor being like you know what they took one of my Mansions do you want to get reelected that's how power really works interesting so that's really interesting and seems self-evidently true to be hugely impactful uh I don't know if I'm fully on your team that the public when they get loud enough it doesn't matter it does matter but I'm saying that one you voting is not going to matter although if you want to do it more power to you so but if you matter then you then your your voice will matter if you matter your voice will matter that's very well said indisputable now why then because that's a freakishly corrupt system it's not corrupt it's human nature why are those two mutually exclusive because the idea that everyone should have an opinion on everything and that opinion should be validated is ridiculous okay so this is I have to keep uh hold in my mind your frame of reference uh so you did you feel very comt I think of was Socrates that basically said democracy makes no sense because these people are not educated enough to have an opinion uh no cuz I don't like that word education in there because it's easier to train a smart dog than a dumb one and the educated people are often the most malevolent um it was bakunin who was fighting Marx because this they were the two strains of Communism in the 1860s and you know Marx had his totalitarian version and bakunin had his Anarchist version and bakunin's like your idea of Scientific Socialism which was what Marxism was presented as is God help you if you're not a scientist so very quickly the elite becomes self validating and anyone who's not part of this educated master class is by definition uned it's funny how um you see all these conservatives being like oh you should have taken IQ test you know to to be able to vote it's like who do you think is going to be administering these tests and one of the questions will be like are you if you're not vaccinated you automatically have a low IQ so they're just going to have the people in power are going to have the test run to maintain their power they're not interested in having everyone have a say that makes no why would they well let me answer that question uh and this is what I was getting at with the how does a corrupt system yield these positive results if you can think longer term then you would because you want a system that works for you you want a system that works for your kids and ideally you want a system that makes you feel like you have integrity that I'm voting for something that uh follows my value system but but Tom have you you've had you you ran an enormous company I'm sure you had to deal with La all the time right how does the law work there's a judge or a tribunal Y and your lawyer job is to give the judge the rationalization for why they should vote for you right so when I'm a realtor and I call a politician it's not like you know what they're really screwing me man like you got know it's like no what you're doing is really hurting blah blah blah they give him an excuse so he maintain and what he could say the public so he maintains the sense of I'm fighting for the good guys I'm a moral person even though it's being geared toward helping that Realtor whoever that person is who's calling him at that moment listen I believe in real politique you have to deal with the world the way that it actually is and if you're in the middle of a power game then you have to play to win yes uh but at the same time I do believe in being a person of integrity and I've been put in enough situations where I could have made a far easier choice and maybe nobody would have even known about it but I would know about it and so I did I've made decisions that have cost me tens of millions if not hundreds of Millions millions of dollars a politician might not be able to afford that because at a certain point I'm going to get voted out but it's always going to be a percentage so sure and yes to the voted out part that's a whole different thing um and look I am not a saint remember I look at myself and say bro it's way too easy for you to end up being the Nazi guard and not the person hiding an Frank in their closet you call yourself bro uh I do yes very much so in fact uh I distrust myself very um my emotions will lead me astray so I'm constantly trying to be very wary of the things that I will want to do and what my initial impulses will be and on and on but I think the moments where I seem the craziest to you are the moments where um you lose sight of I think that people can be swayed by ideas and so I'm in the idea business I'm about trying to get the best idea out into the world now I may be completely delusional because of the asymmetry that you so cruy introduced me to that uh people can break someone's mind far easier than they can build them up but I when I look at okay how close are we getting to a Banana Republic I really want people to go and look I don't have kids but I still want the world to be better for the next generation of kids that just seems like that that is my value system and I want to live in accordance with my values so by putting that idea out there by living according by showing people you can have a set of values and live according to them it will make you feel good good about yourself and you're by yourself and that's the whole [ __ ] point of life and now like hey what is the honorable thing here to pursue and I feel like if nobody talks in that language if nobody puts forth the idea of you ought to live an honorable life you ought to have a goal that is about not only your well-being you should take yourself into consideration 100% but also the well-being of others if nobody talks about it then people don't have the the idea to bring into their life you keep use I don't think anything you said is crazy first of all you keep using this word people as if humanity is homogeneous in terms of their psychology or their morality that's absolutely insane okay uh I will I will Define what I mean by that because of course I'm uh giving you the Punchy answer I'm just to say one sentence because you demonstrated to the contrary when you were talking to those inner city kids and you gave them good ideas and 98% of them you were Whistling Dixie and 2% so that's what I'm talking about okay perfect that's what I heard and now what I want to say is it it is universal nothing is universal I know you somebody's mentally ill broken right I got it yeah he implied it we all heard I'm just gonna move on Mr mes so if if you'll let me set that aside now you can go okay I need to go Downstream I need to get people in they're young if I get people when they're young I can introduce these ideas all people uh uh again I'm asking you to let me set aside if somebody's below a certain intellectual threshold uh they won't be able to do it unfortunately if somebody encounters an accident if somebody has mental illness schizophrenic some who's nor typical right somebody who is unable to uh think through these issues but the the vast majority of humanity is wired in such a way that you will be able to get them on a good path so the perfect example is the people in the inner city um so for instance you actually brought this up and I didn't stop you at the time cuz I didn't want to break your flow but uh I met a kid once who was smarter than me in that he could process raw data faster than I could okay and he was very unsuccessful in life and I was like hey why are you unsuccessful why aren't you even trying you're so smart and he said oh my mom told me that people the world doesn't want people that look like me to succeed my God awful awful and was he ugly he was not but he was not white which was his punchline okay and so I was like even if that's true that's the worst advice in the world because of how it impacts your behaviors yes so I'm just like and who cares what the world wants [ __ ] the world in that case yeah yeah totally so anyway introduced him to the Kobe Bryant quote boobs don't block dunks no matter how much people hate you you can get so good at a thing that they can't stop you uh so I'm just trying to say you can I like that quote a lot it's so [ __ ] good yes uh so if you can get people to for instance the number of words that a child Hears by the age of three is is going to wildly impact how their brain develops this is I believe I I'm not sure if I'm conflating this at one point Drew is going to figure this out for me uh but I always attribute it to Jeffrey Canada uh Jeffrey Canada looked at why are middle CL middle class kids successful and low-income kids are not like in terms of Life prospects and he said a big part of it is the number of words that a kid Hears by the age of three because of what it does to the language centers of their brain plausible to me and the ratio of positive to negative words and so if kid hears 5 million words by the age of three instead of 3 million which is what they hear in the inner cities uh just has this massive impact on their language centers and then if they get 70% as encouraging things you can do it well done Bravo uh versus don't do that stop that's stupid why why are you doing that uh when the ratio is 70 positive 30 Negative they do well when the in the inner cities it's exactly reversed and they hear 30% positive and 70% negative he was like if I could just get people to understand that will have this massive impact in terms of the actual development of their brains so I'm just saying if an idea can then manifest in a physical way it's all about you have to like get these ideas out there you have to get people to adopt them because it will have this massive impact so this is me responding saying humans are humans and so even though there is there are breaking points where somebody can I think it's below like 84 or whatever they are they are technically a [ __ ] like that's the actual definition of it may not be 84 but it's somewhere around in there uh so sure there are going to be some people that just don't meet the criteria but focusing on the people for whom that does work they are close enough to Universal that you should just get all of those ideas that prove over time to be useful first of all 85 is one standard deviation below the mean so you're just hand waving away a third of the population so you're starting I'm probably wrong then about the actual number you're under first you're underestimating because if those metrics using your own numbers why wasn't it 30% of those inner city kids who liked your ideas why was there only two well because now we're getting into uh the brain an adult can change but they won't because there is so much neurological baggage working against them uh maybe you find this interesting enough I'll give you a real answer so here's what's really happening uh the brain exists in a just bath of heuristics okay and it has to you have to filter out more information than you let in yes and so if you know that neurologically your brain is just screaming for one heuristic after another uh you begin to understand that oh people just live their life by rules of thumb there is actually a giant Blank Spot in Your Vision which nobody perceives because the brain goes don't wor I got you and will fill that in right this yes ex my point now as you get older all of those heuristics become they're hardwired literally through a process called myelination so it is actually easier for you to perceive the world through those heuristics literally calorically easier for you to perceive the world through those fistic than it is to break out of them and so while you can go through the tremendously difficult process of letting those melinated connections atrophy and then build new connections so that you make the new more useful ways of being uh they become the cognitively easier things to do it it is just an unbelievable amount of energy and you think that a vast majority of people are interested in using an unbelievable amount of energy for 2% that's what I ballpark to that's why I gave up on adults remember I covered this so I'm not speaking to the 98% as adults I can't it's pointless so I'm just trying to sway the people that are swayable now I've made up the 2% to 98% but because I refuse to believe in futility for people that aren't watching he is looking at me like I've lost my mind so I'd like to give you a chance to or I was technically looking like you never had it so let's be let's be precise okay fair I I think you are and I'm baffled y I think you are grossly overestimating the mental capacity of someone who has a 100 IQ okay they are living they cannot think in it it's just incomprehensible to someone of your intellect it's they're not sitting down and grappling with the great ideas of the world that's beyond their Ken it's the kind of thing like I'm never going to be some kind of huge like bodybuilder it's not [ __ ] possible where there's lots of guys genetically have that capacity these people do not have the capacity or interest and what's the payoff for them either to kind of Juggle a things at once in their head they don't have the bandwidth for it doesn't mean they're bad people but it means that they're not reachable in the way that you're arguing for and they're functionally fundamentally different human beings in the same way that my brain and Steven brain if he were alive and and mobile are fundamentally different humans Can you steal man what I'm saying what do you think my strategy is um everyone should read minec that's what I heard it's good time for the joke um I if I could steal man your position you would say that yes it takes a lot of work and most people aren't interested in willing the work to do the work but other than humans who are but no fault their own somehow incapacitated they have the capacity even as adults though it's much much much easier as children to work through these issues and put their brains in a fundamentally better direction that is in touch with reality yep that's all perfect I'll just add one thing so with adult completely disagree that's great and that'll be fun to talk through uh the only thing I'll add is with adults I'm just trying to get better her istics so that okay they're like I'm only going to operate on heuristics thank you for giving me those and I watched over the course of from Co till now heuristics change everybody's lives correct and as new heuristics enter the field through very bright people uh all of a sudden it was like oh whoa I had a new narrative to your point about Alternatives and I I have watched like miraculous amounts of change in like a four-year period it's been incredible and has really driven home for me that the right idea set in the right way makes massive change it does primary focus is kids but it's not massive change in terms of there's going to be some people it'll reach and the rest will be bandwagon okay it'll be euristic for them and so what is so is our disagreement over the impact of the bandwagon people the no I think the number not the impact the just the sheer volume you're saying so the impact of the sheer volume will you give me that wait I don't if that's what you're saying that where we're disagreeing is that I you think I'm being blind to the sheer volume of people that um will fail to adopt the new heuristics that will fail to be able to create new heuristics is so big they're just all bandwagon people that there's so many of them that you're never going to be able to fight against them no you can you can give them the good new ristics okay but you're thinking you're converting them and I'm saying no you're not converting them they're just getting new ristics and it's the same just putting on a new set of clothes they're not actually doing the work okay that's that yeah so the number of who actually sit down and do the work and and burn those calories in terms of reprograming the brain is not going to be a vast majority it's going to be a tiny tiny minority and the vast majority I don't think have the capacity and you think they do ah okay I see where we're disconnecting um I I like to be optimistic and I go about what about questioning your feelings yeah no 100% this is why I'm I am being honest about what Isen happening right now because privately I over the last seven or eight years have grown to lament something that bothers me because I think it is dangerous and true here's what is dangerous and true it is true that holding nuanced opinions is very difficult and I think of myself I'm relatively smart if we're looking at a bell curve I'll be generous and say I'm above average but I'm nowhere near somebody who's really bright that's not true just my no no what give me numbers because very bright it can be what do I think my IQ is yeah what you think someone who's very bright oh very bright north of 135 you're you don't think you're north of 135 definitely not you're deranged interesting you're completely deranged 135 is not particularly impressive okay if 135 is an impressive then where is that you know it's like 135 is someone who's like I I don't have the I wish someone could look up the numbers but I think it's like someone who's like 63 okay we see 63 people all the time they're tall but it's not com no fo okay which is tall but not that's 115 I think it's one then I'm in there is my gut instinct you are you are smarter than someone who 63 is tall that strikes me okay great I really don't want to because I'm unlikely to see myself accurately so great uh what I am trying to map out is that um I totally agree that there is uh this very large number anyway getting back to what is dangerous and true uh whether I'm in the group out of the group almost doesn't matter I the feeling that I get is I have a hard time understanding some of these very like when BLM popped off I was frozen because something felt wrong but I didn't know what and so I was trapped by great name bad planning and so I remember my wife posted about it and I kept saying I wouldn't something just doesn't feel right but because I couldn't articulate what it was and so as it all came out and people gave me new heuristics I was like that's what's happening I was like damn if I can't do this quickly like it took me a long [ __ ] time to wrap my head around around what was happening and how I was how I had a worldview that wasn't accurate and updating it and [ __ ] it took a long time so anyway I was like whoa Nuance positions are extremely difficult if somebody like me is struggling and I'm reasonably smart we don't have to get lost in that again but if I can't do it or I can't do it fast then this is really going to be scary but I'm not just here's where it gets dangerous I'm not willing to just go hey quote unquote Elites think through everything for me and just tell me what to do or AI think through everything and just tell me what to do both of those sound [ __ ] terrible so it's true though I acquas to your point that there is a very narrow band of people that can really not be Bamboozled by a frame of reference where somebody can't give them a frame of reference that they just immediately adopt something Trump is amazing at he can quote unquote control the frame so you bring an argument to him he'll just Chang the frame and now you're arguing about what he wants to argue about absolutely brilliant yes very few people can do it almost nobody can do it at that level anyway that is dangerous in that you can't just give it over to Elites to think through it because they will slide towards tyranny and Madness uh but it's also true and so now what now what Michael when you say you can't give who do mean you all of us none of us can afford to do that there's simpletons whatever you want to think there's no us there's if you're the elite why would this be bad for you if you're the elite I don't I mean I mean if I'm I'm if I'm n yeah the elites I'm sure are like yeah let's do it right so it's not all of us so so if you're creating this binary between the elites and everybody else Elite rule is in many ways inevitable people are going to have someone who's going to be managing aspects of their lives my goal is to have that Elite be as decentralized as possible because as I was saying earlier it doesn't make sense for one person to be making your decisions about your accounting or your health and also your legal practices but somehow in a politician they're going to speak for you when it comes to the environment and gay rights and you know War it's it's this bizarre package deal that we accept in no other part of our life no one here wants to have Coca-Cola pick their groceries for them and their meats and their shoes it's not a thing um but again I I think a lot of people want to be and there's nothing wrong with that like as I said earlier I want my lawyer to tell me what to do I want my doctor to tell me what to do I want my accountant to tell me what to do so this idea of deference to the elites and I'm saying this is an anarchist isn't inherently wrong what's wrong is having this one-sized fits-all Elite which is imposing its will and there's no on you with force and there's no exit door I can fire my lawyer or I can have a second opinion doctor to all these other things if a lot of my neighbors like you know Governor Abbott he's my governor no I want a governor who can stand for something yeah uh not to rehash the initial thing but I I feel like you slip you jump the track on level where that level of thinking makes sense uh because you I have a base assumption which maybe you've got a great challenge for but I have a base assumption that you do need to organize things using some structure yes and the current structure that we have certainly in the west feels very usable um where you've got your local keep saying we yeah I don't know so yes you have to gr there are different there's different there's business we have structures talk we and my family no but I mean I can talk we and my state what I'm saying is there's different structures like there's the structure of like business I go to the bookstore the the publisher prints books the books go to the bookstore I pay the book Merchant I get my book that's a structure yep drug laws are a structure Co laws I mean there's there's overlapping structures so some of the structures were work very very very well and some of the structures work very very poorly so to say that broadly speaking our structure is working I think it's it glosses over things that could be easily be subdivided okay I don't disagree with any of that okay I'm just saying you always get triggered with the word we uh in any moment it depends on what I'm referencing whe why I'm saying we so in that exact moment I was thinking about I think uh we in California uh or maybe I picked that up because you started talking about the governor but uh when you are looking at the structures there are some things that should be handled at the family level there are other things that should be handled at the community level other things that should be handled at the state other things handled at the country other things that require Global cooperation uh so there are times you made a micro expression that tells me something didn't land this whole Global cooperation like what you don't think what what is that is it what the aliens are coming like what are you talking about uh over fishing okay that's that's but that's it doesn't have to be coroporation it's just you have to monitor the the um I'm a huge Marine zoologist by the way yes [ __ ] I knew that that for that reason that could be very much at the very least a function of uh the waters around each like Japan is causing a problem with the Wailing you know MH it doesn't have to be Global okay but you so like if Mexico's or some country if Chad or some landlock country is against whaling we don't need them okay right uh I'll bring up I don't know what your take is going to be on this at all and I don't have a well formulated one but obviously climate is one that most people go to immediately that it does require Global cooperation isn't it useful that this this thing that is so kind of uh uh ambiguous justifies government doing something to literally everyone on Earth one of my favorite tweets was uh about G tunberg um uh you know the weather's favorite special needs child saying how um there's no one one more priv privileged on Earth than the white girl who refuses to go to to school until literally everyone on Earth changes the weather for her um the the climate stuff is not having global cooperation it wouldn't need Global cooperation even if all the climate science were true it would simply be a function of the largest polluter agreeing not to admit CO2 and everything will be fine you don't need some of these little countries to sign on at all it just needs to have like the big three or four and the climate the the um carbon emissions would be collapsed to near nothing but I think people's point on that is if they're true uh if only the us or only the UK does it it won't make a difference that's not Global you just need you just I agree with you right they're correct International does that feel better sure that's much better than Global okay so International cooperation but that's very different though Fair totally acquest but I'm just my point is I feel like your ideology works at some levels and not at others I I think the climate change ideology is working very well in a very nefarious way yeah that's a whole different one which I don't know enough about uh and have inherent skepticism based on what I've seen over the last four years I would have been totally on board until I saw that I was being lied to left right and Center this also speaks to what we're talking about with revealed preferences which is if I was genuinely I've said this on Rogan and people lost their minds and I'll say it again because I was right if people in the know revealed preferences are I can tell you I like your headbands but if I'm never buying them not wearing them how much do I like them right so if I'm telling you I think you're going to have rising sea levels and I'm putting all my money on Coastal real estate I don't really think that the sea levels are going to rise so if you see all real estate agents politicians they're buying beachfront property they're not thinking it's going to be underwater in 5 to 10 years so that says a lot more than what their mouths do yeah there's no doubt about that um okay uh talk to me about the national divorce you have spoken about it before you said earlier when I brought it up you said ah that isn't what I was talking about in this moment yeah um do you want a national divorce and what does that look like exactly I am gladdened that as part of the Texas where Texas where I am now Texas governor of Republican Party platform is to have a referendum on Texas reasserting its independence and leaving the union um I think it is going to be a matter of time I think if I asked people in 19 in sorry in 201 um 15 less than a decade ago 2014 a DEC let's say a decade ago which do you think is more likely that Texas secedes from the union and becomes a country again or Donald Trump will be our next president 99% of people would say the former right um I think this country has been held together since the beginning with Dum tax and string we have at very least two separate cultures probably more um and I think at a certain point it's like why are we putting ourselves through this and I think as you talked about earlier with the Border there is going to be increasing incentives and increasing actions from different Governors both Democrat and Republican looking at what's being done in Washington saying this doesn't speak for me screw you uh M who's that there was that quote about um uh uh uh justice Warren made his decision let him enforce it it's the kind of thing where it's just like oh the president thinks this happens Sanctuary cities right now where it's just like yeah you know what Isis and welcome here I don't care what the federal government says happens with drug legalization where you had marijuana and all these drugs that are legalized state level all illegal and federal level every marijuana dispensary is right now breaking the federal law at a certain point they're like you know we're just not going to enforce it or the governor are like you're you're coming across my border Over My Dead Body so all these little things are moving toward I think U um further breaking up our Union which I think is long overdue long overdue okay so the reason that that would be good one there 's a sense of illegitimacy to this one thing overseeing everybody yes uh two there is um people no longer have to be with people that you know like you said just because a bunch of people think Governor Abbott should be the governor hey that doesn't speak for me and so I'm able to sort of regionalize off you're still going to have those problems but at least maybe you're now having them with people who think more like you are there other reasons why you think that would be good and I'm imposing that I'm I have the whole thing about human flourishing you've never really pushed back on that so I'm guessing something akin to that rides over the top of your worldview as well not really because one of the big counterarguments is like I hope Texas secedes you're going to be brok and you're going to be begging to be moved back in America in a week and the answer is there's lots of people who'd rather be poorer and Freer and live in a country that aligns more with their value than wealthier and subjugated so even if it's counter flourishing I know using flourishing in a broad sense not just meaning Financial but even if it's counter flourishing in the Financial sense there's plenty of people who will be like fine I'll take that gam Britain they have the NHS socialized Healthcare Britain is is poorer than the poorest American state but they're like you know what we rather have this and have this National healthc care that we're obsessed with uh and even though everyone's poor it's like fine you want that more power to you okay so uh is the thing that overrides your decisions Freedom just you want choice you want people to be able to make their own decisions but I think freedom and human flourishing are uh indistinguishable in the terms of inseparable for the simple reason that in a free system uh it is the it by definition maximizes the capacity of human beings to create things of value and to provide for human flourishing and are incentivized to do so what do you do you know bology balachi yeah yeah am I pronouncing his name wrong I don't know one of us is cuz I thought it was bology Noy yeah I've met it yeah I think he's might be one of the smartest people ever met I know he's one of the smartest people ever met yeah can do you know his philosophy about the network State well enough to break it down no I would not feel comfortable speaking for him I this is a flaw in my personality I feel very comfortable saying this is what I think I understand uh so I'll break it down andology by all means strike me down if I am incorrect or everybody can watch the episode that I did with bology where he goes into this um okay so he has a concept called the network [Music] ofes don't know how muchy think itely uh is the more I learned about money the more I realized that money was going to be the way to fight against the government most effectively yes and that when Bitcoin was created and I don't know if they were sort of intentionally quiet about this or if I just missed where they basically said PS government this is how we take your power away yes um but by creating Bitcoin as I learned about it I was like wait hold on like this is going to strip the government of a ton of its power yes so I uh and this is obviously why I thought you might know bology so B's whole thing is okay uh once you take money out of the hands of the government now people really can begin to organize themselves along different lines and he said the everybody is trapped in this box of thinking that the lines that are going to be drawn are going to be Geographic and he said in a world where money can travel at the speed of light instantly in a world where communication can happen at the speed of light instantly people can live anywhere and they can organize themselves not along Geographic States but along Network Community even if they're not together States and that people will vote and live lives according to laws according to their group now laws is the first word that triggered something in my subconscious that maybe I'm not remembering the words that he used well uh so set that one aside yeah Norms maybe even closer to what he likes they're imposed so it's rules yeah okay perfect so in his vision there is sort of this complete disillusion of all of the things that we think of as the organizing bodies of Our Lives do you know how you can sum all up all everything you just said in one word Anarchy yeah you are describing the anarchist system of governance M but when I brought that up to you earlier the what I heard you say because one of my as I whenever I have somebody that thinks in a way that is um very new to me I'll try to map at okay what do I think about this uh so that I can at least find like in my nent approach to this topic where will I Collide or want Clarity or whatever and one of the things um I wanted to better understand was well if you in in reality you're GNA have this moment where there is an state that is anarchist and they're going to if they have resources that somebody else wants they're just going to get trampled and so just what do you mean justan you mean they're just gonna get [ __ ] they're not gonna fight back I make a base assumption that they would not be well enough organized but you may have already thought through this problem and I me this is another asymmetry where like you have a small population and even if you have an army it's still going to punch way above its weight yeah but in the beginning you did say and which is why I never even asked a question you were like you're going to have this isolated region they're going to be living by these principles they're going to be vulnerable to other people sure that's why I would tell them to be careful I'm not saying they can't win but I'm saying if you're going to take on the whole world like really think things through right whereas if it's even smaller if it's just like some ranch or something like that it might be easier for them to get away with it because they're not trying to make an example that everyone else on Earth can see so if when I had asked you at the beginning of the interview hey is this something that you want to see everybody adopt what would that look like would it be a better place would it be worse you didn't go yeah let me tell you this thesis about Network States and how we're going to group up so there's some reason that that wasn't your answer at the beginning and I would like to cuz now it seems like hey you're making my case for me but am I or is is this somehow doesn't scratch your itch so what he bagian are doing are I think the same and I I don't know if I'm blowing his cover I don't want to speak for him certainly I Define anarchism as the precept that you do not speak for me and everything else being application I don't know what the second half of that statement means does it matter yes but we get a second um point being I am advocating for dogs and he's for puppies and he's advocating for baby dogs so he's giving you a description for people who need to know what it would look like and how it could work in practice whereas I and they he's um doing an endr run around the concept of government legitimacy he's like you know what you believe governments are legitimate that's cool here's an alternative so in the same way that if you have a public road and a private road and the toll for the private road is significantly cheaper and the road is uh smoother less potholes and less accidents you don't have to persuade anyone that private roads are better they're just going to go by the benefits as opposed to doing the work mentally I'm looking at it the other way I'm going at it top down that all this is illegitimate have that as you're operating assumption and I'm not here building possible Alternatives so I think our worldviews are me and him are extraordinarily uh uh complimentary and we're speaking toward different types of minds I think he speaks to people who are much more um established and system Builders and probably older in life and and can think things through whereas I'm trying to radicalize uh especially young people and it's much more of an emotional approach in the sense of having them have this visceral abhorrence and and and and hatred interesting so what I just heard and tell me if I got this right is that that's a really clear way of saying okay what bology wants to do is paint the picture of where you're going we need people like that I'm glad he's doing it not just what speaks to me as a person what I want to do is tell you why the current status should enrage you yes okay it does speak to me as a person but I just don't I'm not the guy uh whose approach is his and he's doing a like we're talking about with entrepreneurs he doesn't need me there's his place on the shelf and he's doing a superb job of it got it okay um I have to know I want my audience to know more about you and why you're so hard to put in a box I find you utterly fascinating so I was fortunate enough to find myself at your house in Austin which thank you by the way I was very generous I was a stranger to you entirely when I walked through the door that's not true I've eaten a lot of quest bars in my day I'm not kid did you know that I was the guy no no yes did cuz you followed me on Twitter once okay oh interesting I didn't know you had any of those puzzle pieces put together as far as I knew when I I didn't that that was you though when you that's what I'm saying know as far as I knew in that moment I was just a stranger to you uh and what I said with to you is you have been on my radar as somebody so interesting because I cannot put you in a box uh it has been really enjoyable to map your thinking and figure out sort of the anarchist approach and I'm actually beginning to understand Anarchist approach not and fair fa you're certainly maybe not in this interview but in others have made that abundantly clear uh but there's also like all these crazy sides to you so I'm I'm gonna they're all crazy just some just pass better but they're so interesting so you give talks on networking which I would have not understood based on your public I know you don't like persona but I don't know what okay cool you're public persona but because I've had a private communication with you uh on WhatsApp I went to my wife and like I was like he's good at a thing that I I couldn't be more toned de to this is before I knew that you did networking stuff because I literally reached out and was like Hey thank you for having me over I would love to have you on my show and you without missing a beat I mean there might have been a brief exchange on that but as if you had Tourette's you started sending me uh fish stuff like things about uh fish aquariums I don't remember how it came up but I was like I was I didn't just bring it up out of nowhere it felt like that to me oh man look because I again this is a me I lack the ability to um build relationships like that so I went to my wife and I was like this is incredible like he's picked a thing he cares about and he's just like sharing it with me hold on hold on no no no no no no no no you want to see like if it was or if I said hey tell me about did I say something about the aquarium house I didn't just bring up fish out of nowhere I'm so curious now oh yeah because I sent you uh a picture of um the Harvey PE card drawing of me which was fish story about my aquarium and then you're like was that out of the blue well you had booked me on the show yep right so I was giving you a little bit of backstory about who I am got it and then you're like oh is that Co that fact you have in the picture about fish true because I was working on a graphic novelet that was a graphic novel I was involved in already and then when you were asking me about fish I was giving you more fish information got it it wasn't out of nowhere that's interesting to me it would never I mean people would have to read the specifics it would never occur to me it was so wonderful and I'm trying to learn from it that the way that you felt like you invited me into this I don't I didn't at that time know if you talked about it publicly or not but invited me into like this really fascinating part of your life if you've ever heard somebody say there's nothing more interesting than talking to someone who's passionate about a thing like I've never thought about sea creatures before but because you were so interested it was are you using my line because I I talk about this all the time so I don't know if you're referencing this I say there's two types and this is talks to earlier about those people who are stuck in their the buckel people I said you go to a party what someone goes to a party and you meet someone who's I don't know a hamster breeder and there's two approaches hamster breed reader that's weird or sit down and tell me everything and my people are the second one and the first people I want to alienate and want nothing to do with and to who do you guys hate do you hate the guinea pig people do you hate the rabbit they hate somebody like which are the rare ones like do you know how do you clean them there so much there so to me intellectual curiosity about something anything is basic to having any sort of communication with them like if they don't have that it's just like it's a wrap my initial impression of you and this is partly why I think I was so um caught off guard by you so quickly sharing something that clearly was like a real deep interest of yours my initial take on you was Internet troll somebody was just trying to go for the ls I know that's what I'm saying is that word just exactly so I can't put you in the troll box am in the troll but okay I had this okay do you ever have IIA imagine arguments no uh I think I know what you mean sure I just have never given them a name okay or I imagine a conversations sure where I think through both sides of this what I I've had this um imagin conversation with you for weeks now because yes because you said this when we met like I don't know what box to put you in and I'm glad I can pick your brain on this I've often said that human beings don't have a true false filter they have an us them filter what utility do these boxes serve you where people who think like this other than us or them I don't think it's that it's certainly isn't that for me it is I'm trying to be able to predict the um if I do this thing with you or to you what outcome will I get and so if I can predict the outcome of an interaction with somebody that's far more useful because now I know what I'm going to get if I can't predict the outcome then it gets harder and so ultimately I'm trying to filter people into known archetypes okay they're more or less like this nobody's completely the archetype obviously but uh you can usually put into an archetype yes so like take Cody Sanchez an a incredible human being very bright but when you think of her as a driven entrepreneur it's like you're going to get 80% of the way there you'll be surprised at the margins but she really fits neatly into that box both socially both in real life like all of the things I mean when I say that you get to engage with her at that level now I'm thinking uh you're an Internet troll right but clearly very smart I've seen enough of your inter where I'm like you're fascinating but I'm always like whoo like the troll will come in a weird way or something that I would be mortified by like I can't watch the British office I am so horrified by that kind of Comedy I just can't do it and I heard you give like this three minute dissertation about how you love comedy where you are so uncomfortable and you just want I forget when you say throw up or you want your life tself whatever and you're like and I just I love that and I I hate that so much I am so uncomfortable so anyway that tells me you're that kind of person so I have that kind of image in my mind when I walk into your house and then I look at your wall and you have all these comics and so I'm like oh these are ironic so I'm like oh I may have even asked you something like like is this irony like what is this you're like no I love Comics so I'm like you've actually read these Comics you're like yes because I have a passion for comics and you were so sincere and then I look over on the island in your kitchen and there's a Lego set fabuland and I was like oh what's the Lego set and you said when I was a kid I always wanted fabuland and now I have it constructed and everyone's always happy in fabuland so when you look at it it puts you in a good mood and I was I'm just completely disarmed it's really really interesting so uh help me understand Michael malice what are what are all the pieces you just broke my brain because until you said said that and you're right and I'm wrong I never I I I want to say almost never think through how a person is going to react I just do what I want and it's worked for me and I surround myself with people who I respect and who are interest to me are interesting to me so I and I want them to surprise me like if I ask one of my friends you know what you think of this book I don't want to I want to be like okay I might be able to guess broadly speaking but one of my clest friend Steph there's a song I just saw and I'm like I I think you'd absolutely love the song she goes I can see why you think that I don't so it's kind of cool to me but I don't have a a a career or whatever it is where I have to think about how the person's going to react I I think I always think of if they say yes I do this if they say no I do this and well I forget where I heard this quote and it's been one things that's helped me out the most in life where someone said to me it's either a yes or a no everything else is just noise and if you look at that approach when you're trying to work with someone or something like that it's really takes a lot of the emotion out of it and all the sting out of it because if someone doesn't return you've had to deal with this a lot in your career I've had to deal with this a lot in my career where someone just blows you off like they don't respond like if you don't if you learn not to take it personally it makes your life a lot easier and be like okay if this editor doesn't respond to my uh um proposal who's Plan B who's plan C if this project is DOA what am I going to do next that's kind of how I Orient myself no I get that and being surprised is fun that obviously is one of the reasons that I found you so intriguing um so but yes I am try I will update my mental model every time somebody surprises me and try to understand what does that mean what does that tell me about this person uh being able to develop a rich theory of Mind of other people is one of the great joys in life for me I absolutely love it but I think few people have Rich minds too mine sure but why is that important well just because earlier you're talking about how so many people there there's so much going on in there and I think it's test patterns interesting um how much of a guiding principle is that for you in life extremely really yes is that why you troll no I troll because it's awesome um it's a guiding principle like if I go to an event I have to make sure I have an escape hatch do you mean that literally like this could get dangerous and I like if I'm not having fun I have to have an like like if I'm at a dinner party I better have backup you know what I mean I'm not like I get asked to like do these talks or like you know hey come speak to our thing and it's just like I'm G to be trapped there and like I don't think there's any amount of money that I can be paid for this because I already know at the end they're going to be like Oh see it wasn't so bad was it I'm like you don't know me this is still work it's very interesting very interesting um give me the what do you hope is the punchline of Michael mice's life this was the title I pitched for my biography e hubis that they said no uh it still would have been a better title The Little Engine That Could but shouldn't it's good I love that yeah I love that so you're gonna be successful at things that are I don't think you literally mean you shouldn't have but in the cheeky way yes awesome Michael where can people follow you uh twitter.com Michael malice and x.com Michael malice malice. locals.com and I've got a couple of fun books in The Works which I'm very excited about brother the second they already let me know I'd love to have you back on this was a lot of fun thank you much for doing it all right everybody if you haven't already be sure to subscribe and until next time my friends be legendary take care peace if you like this conversation check out this episode to learn more with social media and just the democratization of everything has given us some insight into how rotten our institutions were in the first place there's a kind of woke ification of the right is that is happening it's like professional wrestling nobody cares that it's fake if I