"We Should Fear Trump As President" - Civil War, Assassination, DEI & Islam Takeover | Gad Saad
TIeTxIUBWig • 2024-07-30
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions Language: en there is an expression a saying in in in the Islamic context first we come for the Saturday people then we come for the Sunday people the Saturday people are the Jews the Sunday people are the Christians I can I can link pretty much every single public policy disaster that you could think of to the misfiring of empathy you know what is the most dangerous force in nature female sexuality Gad sad welcome back to the show oh so good to be with you Tom dude really fun to have you we've already been having a lot of fun before we started rolling here we did uh I want to dive right into the deep end a couple of months ago you sent out a tweet that said that Civil War was coming for the west and do you think that we were a couple inches from that kicking off when the bullet gra Trump's ear oh boy were we ever I mean I can't even imagine the the world we' be living in had he not turned to I mean I'm not much of a Believer some say it was divine intervention uh but whatever it was uh it was very uh lucky because we'd be in a different world today had that guy succeeded what do you think would have happened uh I think a lot of people would have been extremely angry because they would have felt that their voices would not end up being heard uh now does that mean that we would go into full-blown Beirut Lebanon Civil War tomorrow no but it certainly would be stoking the Flames of uh Perpetual unrest but I've been saying by the way I've been predicting that Civil War was coming uh for many many years now again people think that I'm being hyperbolic when I say that oh come on just because of your childhood in Lebanon doesn't mean that Civil War is around the corner everywhere but the reality is when you see the types of deontological principles that are being violated that made the West great what are deontological principl so ethical systems come in two forms there is what's called deontological ethics and there's consequentialist ethics deontological would be if I say it is never okay to lie that's an absolute statement a consequentialist statement would be it is okay to lie to spare the feelings of my wife if she says do I look fat in those genes right well if you want to be married for a long time you better put on your consequentialist hat when that question is posed right so for many things in life we're all consequentialist and that's fine but there are certain principles presumption of innocence freedom of speech uh the pursuit of Truth uh via unbiased scientific method those can't be consequentialist by definition they have to be deontological once we start applying a consequentialist e ethos to those deontological principles we're no longer the West that's that's what differentiates the west from all of the societies that immigrants like me flee and so it doesn't take a a uh you know a crystal ball reader to say look once all of those mechanisms are eroded you're going to have the exact same Strife that you had anywhere else so for example coming from Lebanon I know what happens to a society that is organized according to Identity politics Lebanon is the perfect example of a society akin to the one that the progressives here are trying to create right I am first a member of a group before I am an individual well in Lebanon that's exactly how everything is organized in the case of Lebanon it's not your skin you it's not whether you're transgender or whether you're gay or indigenous it's your religious belongingness as a matter of fact in Lebanon on the ID card that you carry within Lebanon in Arabic it's called ha it's an internal ID the the the most conspicuous element of your ID card is your religion W and so for example Jews were Lebanese Jews it wasn't even written so an Arabic uh Jew is yehudi it wasn't even written yahudi it was written Israeli Israeli means Israelite so you even had greater animist towards you because you somehow didn't have your Lebanese identity you were an Israelite even though we had nothing to do with with with Israel right we we're Lebanese we're arabic speaking our culture is Arabic our food is Lebanese we happen to be Jewish but we're we're we're what's called M Jews Mahi Jews are the the Jews from all of the Islamic countries Libyan Jews yemeni Jews uh Egyptian Syrian Lebanese Jews these are all called Mahi Jews so we're fully Arabic in terms of our culture and you know music language and yet we were referred to as Israelites so now why was that important Lebanon because when you would be stopped at a random roadblock by a militia group during the Lebanese Civil War the first thing they would say is show your papers if your papers didn't have the right IDE identity marker it was resolved With A Bullet to the Head now there weren't too many uh random roadblocks that you were going to clear if you had Israelite on your now there might be a few Christian militia groups that might tolerate you and not put a bullet but most of the factions that were fighting in Lebanon if you were stopped and you showed that card you were dead okay we got we got dark very quickly no well look this is to me the conversation that I really want to map out for myself and certainly want to see other people map out so when I was watching the Trump assassination attempt unfold I had the same feeling of whether you love him or hate him thank God he did not actually get shot because I think Trump is a representative of something that's happening and I mean that in two ways he's representative meaning there are people that feel completely disenfranchised that the system is holding them down that it is corrupted and actively working against the average American and so he represents that voice and then I also think he's literally a representative of the Republican Party who champions for those people and is trying to become the next president and so if you then celebrate the assassination of that person you are going to have all kinds of problems um I am very glad that the only sort of Celebration is the people joking about oh you know I'm just next time don't miss whatever the you've seen a ton of that on some weren't joking I'll I'll assume none of them were um meaning it literally but even then it's still a it you're raising the temperature and this is where I get nervous and this is why I want people to map this out and this is why I find it very interesting this idea of consequentialism versus deontological ISM I'm not sure if that's how you deontological yeah so um once you begin to understand that what I'll call narratives have consequences then it's like okay as I put my voice out into the Public Square where do I want it to fall do I want it to amplify a message do I want it to De amplify a message or do I want just a complete nonresponse to come from me and when you understand how these things build towards whether it's all the way to Civil War uh which is hopefully a very extreme very rare example um but when you see how these steps March down that path then this suddenly becomes highly predictive uh so it is dark but it's also a part of human nature right so how do you view like when you saw an assassination attempt on a presidential candidate what did you think yeah great question so I actually did an X an impromptu X spaces uh last night where I I addressed that what it amazed me is Trump's reaction to that assassination attempt right so you may remember Tom in chapter eight of the parasitic mind I have a you know several call calls to action probably the most famous one that has resonated most with people is when I ask implore people to activate your inner honey badger and the reason why I use the honey badger is because uh many animal behaviorists and zoologists have ranked the Honeybadger as the fiercest the most ferocious of all animals and that's there are a lot of fierce animals it's the size of a small dog yet it doesn't give an f right it can go into a a hot you know be stung by a million bees and it'll still get the honey it could be caught with a con boa constrictor that's almost suffocating it when it gets itself out of it it doesn't run away it says I'm not going to go and kill you it can with withstand an attack of six adult lions and so when I implore people to activate their inner honey Badger I'm saying be ideologically fierce if you have a set of principles that you believe in don't cow don't suck your thumb in a corner and be a fetus stand tall and defend your principles well imagine a guy who just got shot at and the first thing he does is you know where are my shoes fight fight fight I mean it it really be I mean if you hate Trump you still have to in the Deep recesses of your mind say my God I do admire the fact that he's a honey badger so the first thing I I I felt is my God is he going to now turn a lot of people who who were on the fence they're going to say this is the kind of leader that we want and I want to draw here some analogies from my Evolution psychology work so signaling theory is a theory that is used in the animal kingdom to explain all kinds of signaling Behavior so for example when the peacock raises its taale it's a form of sexual signaling right it it is a a behavior and a morphological set of traits right it has a big tail it's iridescent colors why would it have evolved that uh particular uh physiological reality because it is an honest signal of its phenotypic quality it is saying despite the fact that having this big tail I might end up being eaten here I am still therefore you should choose me as your perspective partner so signaling Theory theory is something that I apply in the context of for example explaining conspicuous consumption why is it that 99% of and I'm going to come back to Trump in a second why is it that 99% of Ferrari drivers around the world are male right it's not as though there aren't enough female billionaires who could own those cars it's because men and women use sex specific products as sexual signals men are much more likely to use Maseratis and uh Ferraris women will use high heels and other beautification products and that holds true across very very different cultures so it is a human Universal so signaling theory is something that interests me a lot so now let's apply it the context of what happened with Trump and here I'll draw an analogy when you go into prison and you're on that first I've never been to prison but certainly I understand the Dynamics of prison life when you walk in as a newbie the first thing that everybody looks at you is they want to see if you're going to be a predator or a prey how do you walk where do you sit do you walk tall are you confident are you assertive could this become my little girlfriend or not and depending on that those first few moments it's going to set the trajectory for how you're going to do your time signaling matters so often times uh prisoners will tell you find someone if you're a newbie find someone beat the hell out of them so that you can then demonstrate to everybody else who's watching that I'm a serious guy now let's apply this to Trump trump sends the signal to the world to all the nasty prisoners around the world world the North Korean dictator and the Chinese and Putin and the Islamic thugs I'm not to be messed with I can be unpredictable I'm a rash Cowboy so the exact thing that many people criticize him about I actually view it as a very powerful signal positive signal right if I have the red button and I start going eeny meeny miny mo catch the tiger by the toe even though I'm I'm not unpredictable if I signal to the world don't mess with me then people will pay attention people will fear you president of the United States should be someone that we fear it shouldn't be someone who doesn't know if he is a coffee cup or is a human being right and so right that's why I call him avocado brain this this is not this is not I'm making light of the fact that he has dementia yes we all will grow old and we we all will face some infirmity in our lives I'm not being lacking an empathy but in the president of I know it's become a cliche to say this of the Free World I want a guy who is a nasty Cowboy boy did Trump exhibit that a couple of days ago that's interesting uh we should fear the president tell me more well uh there's a lot of really nasty guys at Corker and prison right there's a lot of nasty guys at San Quenton if I walk in there and I look like I am meek and unsure and infinitely loving and infinitely compassionate people are going to turn me into their girlfriend really quickly right so do you mean the International Community should be the president of course of course the International Community there are a lot of I mean you know there's the expression uh you know uh speak softly but uh carry a big stick or whatever I can't remember the exact expression right yeah walk sofly and car exactly or might is right right so for example in the Middle East this is actually a very interesting point I recently wrote an article about this so do you know do you know what theory of mind is very much okay you do should I should I summarize it okay so theory of mind is something that is really important in human sociality because in in in interacting with you in order for our conversation to go well I have to often times put myself in your mind to say would Tom even me asking now should I should I tell this to your audience because they may not know what you know I'm exhibiting theory of mine now it turns out by the way that autistic children don't have theory of mind so one of the ways that you're able to uh diagnose that a child has autism is there are certain tests that you could give and they will fail it in terms of not having theory of mind that's why you see them very closed off in their worlds they don't read cues and they don't read emotional cues well and so on now why am I talking about all this I introduced a concept which I called cultural theory of mind which is am I able when I am a leader in the geopol political ecosystem am I able to put myself in the mind of this other interlocutor that I'm interacting with well it it baffles me to see how westerners have zero culture cultural theory of mind for example when they interact with leaders in the Middle East what do I mean by that compassion empathy generosity kindness magnanimity each of those uh trait that I just listed are viewed as laudable virtues in the west what the Middle Eastern mind reads it is weakness weakness weakness weakness and weakness so even though we may be sitting and speaking in English or we may have Arabic translators we're actually not speaking the same language because we we have no cultural reference point that we're agreeing on the shared values and so might is is right and that is a universal everybody understands that so if you go to the to the east where I come from the Middle East and you exude some of the traits that Biden exudes then Putin does say hm maybe I'll go into Ukraine today Hamas does say maybe it's time for October 7th now I I don't know for for certain that those things wouldn't have happened had Trump been there but I can if I'm a betting man I would say that the chance of those things happening would be much greater if Biden is President than if Trump is President so being feared as a world leader is a good thing what do you think about internally because I think a lot of Americans fear Donald Trump and I think that's some of the derangement and so when you first said we should fear the president I was like o because that is the I I am worried that internally We Fear either the president or a boogie man version of the president and that that fear of our own leader is creating massive problems yeah well it's misplaced fear because if if you're going to fear a particular party or a particular ideology based on all the evidence that we've gathered you should certainly be fearing a lot more the Biden regime than Trump that and that's why I call it misplaced fear because it's it's Boogeyman as you said right it it is Trump derangement syndrome right I know a lot of very bright people some of whom you also know who genuinely believe that Donald Trump is indistinguishable from Hitler Donald Trump is indistinguishable from Osama Bin Laden the literal words right as a matter of fact one person that we both know said that well he actually admires Osama Bin Laden more than Donald Trump because at least Osama Bin Laden was committed to an ideology he showed discipline and git whereas Donald Trump is just a maniac he is an asteroid hurling at you now if you stop for a second and ask this person and and that person is Exemplar of all my colleagues in Academia say but but why give me a specific well because he's going to Institute martial law what's the evidence of that I don't know it's just he's evil or he's going to stop us from loving our children he's going to Outlaw food he's going to it's this in and that's why Trump derangement syndrome is really an excellent uh moniker to describe this Insanity because now by the way you tell him well okay well if he was going to stop democracy and ins martial laww he was President for 4 years why didn't he do it did he exhibit any of those things that you were worried about no it's really in his second term that he will turn hitlerian so it's just idiocy it's imbecility it's hyperbolic ir irrationality and it it pisses me off it's insane all right let me take the flip side and steal man the argument sure so at the beginning of this I was saying um one of the things that makes me want to talk about War even though I hope that we're very far away from that is that there is a clear path that leads from where we are to there it's a knowable path it's something you can articulate and say well if we go from here to here so for instance ratcheting up the rhetoric from left and right saying that Trump is exactly like Hitler well the logical thing is if you really knew you had identified Hitler before he had committed his crimes you knew 100% with 100% certainty that he would you actually have a moral obligation to take him out so that that's a knowable step byep and so people said it um I forget who it was that straight up said oh God I I remembered it the other day and now I'm forgetting who it was but they straight up said that that the natural conclusion oh it was Tucker Carlson uh they tried censoring him on social media they tried um getting him censored in uh inside the government which I'm blanking on the name what they call that they exactly law fair all of it and and all of it failed and so he was saying and I don't know how many months ago this was but certainly before the assassination attempt he said the only next step is assassination and so it's like again these are knowable paths you can't know them with 100% degree of certainty but they are knowable paths so if I'm in the grips of what somebody else would call Trump derangement syndrome I'd say hold on you yourself just said that there is a staircase that that leads somewhere what I'm saying is Donald Trump is walking along that staircase and so when you get to the point where he on January 6th incites people to go in and look did he hedge and was he over the top no but it's very clear if you look at everything that he did not help the situation he very much wanted to find the votes he very much wanted Pence to come in and say that this is not a legitimate election and because of that I do have the real indicators that he's walking the path toward somebody who has said I want to be add dictator for a day I mean he just gives you all the cues and so no in the first four years he did not walk all the way down the path but he is so clearly on the path how do people not see this you're speaking as a trump derangement syndrome corre I'm not putting forward what I'm saying but I am trying to give them their due in saying every time I go to um just be like what are people talking about there is the the one thing of just if he had just said you know what look no matter what I'm I am going to fight this election in the courts I think it is unjust I think things have been done poorly but everybody the most important thing is that we cue that we're going to transition power no matter what and then we'll fight this in the known channels through through legal courts if he had done that there would be nothing to point at but he didn't do that and so I don't I don't even need you to buy into January 6th I just need you to say that he did not handle that in a way that removes that cudgel from being used against him Point conceded absolutely uh and not only that I mean not just the January 6 thing he didn't handle well he is his worst enemy as I mean he does seem to have reigned in quite a bit maybe it's age who knows maybe it's some humility who you know it's it's unsure what it is but he certainly seems to be a lot more disciplined in some of his outbreaks right uh so there are many reasons why someone may not like him but again part of being a functioning smart individual adult is to have Temperance right to right I hate a child molester more than I hate a jaywalker because I have a calculus that allows me to met out my disdain in a way that is rational and makes sense jaywalking might be a crime but it's not the same as as fiddling with with kids so if we're going to use the who is a greater threat to democracy I've seen a lot more evidence that the Biden regime is willing to violate all of our shared deontological principles more so than anything that Donald Trump has done did he handle January 6 well absolutely not but if my calculus is which of these two gentlemen has committed greater violations of deontological principles that Define the United States it's not even close that it's Biden AI might be the most important new computer technology ever so buckle up the problem is that AI needs a lot of speed and processing power so how do you compete with costs that are spiraling out of control Oracle Cloud infrastructure or oci oci is a single platform for your infrastructure database application development and AI needs oci has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds offers one consistent price instead of variable Regional pricing and nobody does data better than Oracle if you want to do more and spend less like uber 8x8 and data bricks Mosaic take a free test drive of oci at oracle.com Theory again that's oracle.com Theory oracle.com theory if you're tired of trying to find the real truth you have to strive to tell whether the news that you're getting is actual real reporting bias narratives trolling selective reporting whatever the case may be then you need to be using ground news ground news compil stories from across the global political Spectrum giving you every angle so that you can get the full picture and aren't being blindsided I especially like their election page where you can learn more about candidates sort news coverage by key voting issues and get a specific election related blind spot feed to make sure you're not missing out on important stories go to ground. Newsom or use the link in the video description to subscribe today if you sign up through my link you'll get 40% off the same Vantage plan I use to get unlimited access to all their features I really like ground news I think you guys are going to love it they are doing important work and I hope you're going to check them out and stay informed and get rid of your blind spots and this is a great way to do it with ground news give me the greatest hits on Biden why should we fear him uh well for many reasons I mean if we could we could get all philosophical or when you have someone who is pushing uh I call it die diversity inclusion Equity not Dei because die is where meritocracy goes to die anyone who defends anything remotely close to that acronym is violating the most fundamental precept precept of what a meritocratic society should hold dear to it right and I see it every every day in Academia right and maybe I could talk about this uh for a minute or two please I mean what is beautiful about science is that it's objective I mean of course there are biased scientists but if we assiduously pursue science applying the scientific method as unbiased as we can then there are very clear epistemological tools that we can use say this hypothesis looks good this one we can refute it and so on if we want to see which of these candidates are are worthy of an academic position there are very clear metrics we can use how many papers have you published how influential have those papers and books beenin in the same way that in judging who crosses the 100 meters first is not up for debate there's a very clear metric that we can use to decide who gets to stand for the gold medal at the podium now imagine you take all that and you nuke it with this die cult right so that now I mean this is literally true this is is not Gad satire okay University of waterl is a prestigious University in Canada that's kind of like the Mi of Canada it's where a lot of the engineering and computer science stuff has come out of Canada okay University of watero just had two open professorships they're called Canada Research chairs so this is the most prestigious professorship because it's the Canadian government that's endowing those chairs right so this is very and they're called tier one it's the most senior chaired professorship one was in artificial intelligence the other one was in general computer science and I I took a screenshot of their call uh one says this call for professorship and artificial intelligence is restricted to uh people who identify as women transgender TWP uh what's the other one gender fluid I I can't remember the whatever the other one is okay I mean literally stuff that you would think is insane and the the other one was only for racialized minorities or those who consider themselves to be parts of racialized minorities so Im so do you know who Alan Turing is yeah okay so Alan Turing is a gentleman who in my view is one of the smartest minds of the 20th century so so of in my long career as a student you know I spent many many years in University the course that blew my mind the most was a course a theoretical computer science course called formal languages where a lot of the Turing theories were uh described in that course it's a level of profundity that's difficult to imagine that a human mind can come up with that kind it borders on being a religious experience okay if Alan Turing were alive and he applied for those professorships he would be turned down because he's not a racialized minority or two spirit he's gay he's gay I know I agree I agree that might get him somewhere the Gay Part might get him somewhere but it it doesn't have the same coolness as it did maybe 20 years ago you need to be a bit more than gay now and so imagine that in the 21st century this is openly FL right it's it's not something that's hidden in the back pages that's the official call for that Prof for those professorships so now come back to Biden is Biden someone who stands up on the pulpit of of of the poest Podium and say this is insane or is he the one who promulgates and sets up mechanisms that promote the die cult so if only it were that if on every other dimension he were great which he's not and and if he only were a supporter of die he would be a much greater threat than Donald Trump will ever be okay uh I'm going to say that in my words and make sure that I understand because it's a very bold but a little bit abstract idea anybody who attacks the foundation of Truth are more dangerous than somebody who may want to uh be a dictator but he doesn't so that's really a hypothe I mean if he did would that change your math the checks and balances of the American system are such that I can assure you I can bet every penny that I could ever own that there is no pathway for Donald Trump to ever be dictator that's the beauty of the American system there's a million checks and balances right it's not a I mean it's it's starting to look like a Banana Republic but it certainly historically the the fourfathers of the United States were unbelievably preent and setting up all of these machinations to ensure that none of this could ever happen so I I can't buy into that hypothetical but frankly there is nothing more fundamental to the human Spirit than the pursuit of truth if I can get you to stand up as in a confirmation hearing for the Supreme Court and have a Senator asks you tell me what a woman is and you don't have the epistemological confidence to say what kind of dumb question is that of course I could tell you what a woman is and she answers if you remember well you know I'm not a biologist what could be more dangerous than that up is down left is Right some women have 9in penises it's the it's the violation of everything that makes us human some women are very lucky guys some women are very very lucky some right and so it's not even an abstract sense in a in a in a in a in the true definition of what it means to be human is we have a prefrontal cortex that allows us to have a shared meaning for what reality is once you engage in the promulgation of these parasitic ideas that I discuss in the parastic mind where I no longer feel confident in knowing whether men can menstruate listen I Tom I literally get emails from functioning adults Dear Professor sad I know that you are an evolutionary behavioral scientist who studies sex differences so I'm just wondering is it true now that men can menstruate and I write back dear so and so no men cannot menstruate you can take that to the bank but the fact that you have created such instability in that person's mindset that they have to get the impr premature of a professor to tell them so tell me seriously because I've got a 15-year-old daughter is it only her that menstruates or can my buddy Jack also menstruate if we've gotten to that point what could be more dangerous to the human spirit it's interesting so I have no disagreement about uh anything that attacks deontological truth is going to create derangements that will end the West that to me is a very concise statement that I will get behind uh aggressively uh it's what I call the physics of progress so the physics of progress is simply in all aspects of your life you're asking one question I know where I want to go but I don't know how to get there and so I'm going to run a bunch of tests and see which ones actually move me closer to my goal could be being a better parent could be running a business but you have to be able to um say all the things you think are true even if they are wildly offensive if you actually believe this could be true you need to be able to ask it uh and then run an experiment and see if you can get evidence so that you know how to actually progress towards your goal and assuming that your goal is Honorable I'll just short circuit all the comments I making the assumption that your goal is Honorable it elevates not only you but other people okay so attacking that is I have a frame of reference my frame of reference is grounded in Western values and so that to me is anathema to the way that we ought to live I'm making a moral judgment and and I'm very much here for that um what I try to do when I look at people like um I mean take Sam Harris who's somebody I have a tremendous amount of respect for but just canot um see Trump in the same light that I see Trump in uh which for me is just very much uh give me the data I'll look at it if I see that the policies he's going to implement do not lead me to where I want to go then I would be very much against him and if I see that they are right now for me that one's just simple Biden has cognitive decline I am not voting for a mystery set of people behind the scenes like that that is that's that's a non-starter for me I don't even understand um that argument but I want to look at it from from somebody like Sam's point of view and say okay if this person really is a threat to democracy well I care tremendously about democracy so then the question moves to how do we determine if someone is actually a threat to democracy and that I'm very open to having a debate out in public let's see like what's the evidence for what's the evidence against because I agree I very much believe in the government that we have it has for 250 years given us I mean just certainly economic one of the greatest countries that's ever been on the face of the Earth so but getting people coralled into how to approach the problem seems like the problem right we can't get people to agree on the fundamental frame of reference from which we are going to view this how do we get people on the same page so that we have a a debate that has a knowable outcome right phenomenal question can I bore a pen I want to use no no no uh imagine if this were the cork of a wine bottle have I talked about this before you have yeah here or on my show was it I I've heard you speak so many times I don't know because it's going to uh in a sense answer your question yep so there's an expression in Arabic that says getting drunk by smelling the cork of the wine bottle so if this is the cork look I'm getting drunk I'm getting woozy right it refers to the fact that you are of weak constituency in other words that you don't don't really need to do the hard work of drinking the wine for you to get drunk you just take a whiff and you're already Tipsy okay now I take that Arabic saying and I apply it to how people make decisions and so when I say for example that you're getting drunk by smelling the the obam cork look I'm going to smell Obama you ready he has such a malefu voice he has such a radiant smile he says such useless platitudinous [ __ ] but it sounds like a Southern Baptist preacher and so he must be saying something important right I didn't say I agree with his fiscal policy I didn't say I agree with his uh interventionist or non-interventionist foreign policy I'm simply getting drunk by the cork on the other hand here is now Trump he's disgusting he's borish right he's vile he's contener he he lacks that presidential quality he doesn't speak in diplomates right he's he's in your face he's a queen's guy and therefore I'm using so now I'm going to get more psychological there's a there's a persuasion model often used in psychology of advertising called the elaboration likelihood model it basically says that when you're trying to persuade someone if I'm the advertiser you're the consumer I could engage one of two persuasion systems in your in your mind either the peripheral system or the central system peripheral would be the Cosmetic cues so for example if I'm if I am advertising a perfume I don't usually tell you here is the chemical uh compound reason why you should buy this perfume because that's triggering your central cognitive processing and here when it comes to a hedonic product like perfumes it has to be a sexy girl on a horse with her hair flowing and it just says m right so I am queuing your peripheral cosmetic uh system precisely because it's a hedonic product on the other hand if it were here are the eight reasons why you should invest in my mutual funds I probably shouldn't use a sexy girl with her hair flowing to try to convince you why you should put all of your retirement money with our firm I should actually give you real Central cues real sub incentive cues and so the problem lies so to answer your question in this very hopefully not too long-winded way when it comes to choosing the leader of the Free World we should be activating our Central route to persuasion but 99% of people activate their peripheral system so that when you when I I actually engage people and I say why did you vote for Justin trudel three times right because he's well he's just he's young he's he he looked good with his children in his hand he's got beautiful hair he just speaks in a really Progressive Way no no I I know I get it he's tall that's very nice and I could never be president or prime minister because I'm too short I get that but other than his height I got nothing right well maybe he legalized marijuana and I'm a pothead okay so therefore irrespective of the amount of times that I try to invoke in you some cognitive deliberation that you used in choosing Justin Trudeau it always ends up with cosmetic Q cosmetic Q cosmetic Q so now let's bring it back to Trump I think that people like Sam Harris and the rest of those folks and I talk about this in the parasitic mind view Trump as an existential aesthetic injury right see I operate I'm speaking now as Sam Harris and the rest of those folks I operate in the rarified world of the progressive list people in Malibu and US anointed ones can't really be anointed if such a borish pig could Ascend to the highest office now maybe I'm being fian here but it invalidates my existence as a progressive lisp guy look I speak with a lisp you see because I am very educated right and so if this pig can become president it invalidates me I can no longer look at myself in the mirror and feel good about myself so he is an existential threat to my ego not to the world and therefore I there could only be two worlds either I am in French you say the anointed ones the good thinkers or something is off with him and so the only way I could reconcile that reality is I've got to bring him down I think it it truly is that because I've tried to interact with my colleagues who supposedly have many degrees after their names and say but give me the specifics of why you hate Trump it's never it's always a reflexive disgust thing he's disgusting he's racist he's Hitler but why give me the specifics you can never give it to me and so I think the only way to be able to get people to truly take these decisions seriously is if you can get them to not take the peripheral route and take the central route but the central route is hard because it involves thinking it involves most people are cognitive misers they want to use Mental shortcuts and one of the ways that you use Mental shortcuts is you use emotion as a shortcut to heavy lifting right so if Barack Obama peace be upon Him tells me that Islam is a religion of peace or if George Bush said the same thing to be fair then it's easier for me to Simply believe him than to have to go do the hard work of doing a historical and canonical analysis as to whether Islam is peace he said it shortcut it's good enough Islam is peace so that's the problem is that in a world of cognitive misers people who don't want to think you want them to rise to the occasion and use their thought process to choose a president I'm simply not willing to do that because I'm a lazy Pig okay uh you've got your finger on something that I think is really important this the idea of cognitively miserly from an evolutionary perspective uh the brain is just a caloric hog and um if you have to keep that thing fed you literally want to think as little as you need to which is why we find ourselves doing things habitually uh the brain goes through a process called myelination it melinates the patterns of thought literally with a fatty tissue so that the electrical impulses can travel more efficiently so that they require less calories so the things you think a lot you will think forever and anytime we can find you heuristic get that shortcut and just be like oh um this person said it and I trust them therefore I trust all of it or and this is really how things Break um which tribe am I on cool what are all the tribal patterns of voting I don't have time to think through them all uh plus nuanced ideas are very hard to hold and I may just not be at the intellectual level that I would need to be to think through all of this uh so I'm just cool voting down the line uh so I think that's so in keeping with the biology of the human animal I think that all of that is true and you could be the smartest person in the world and if you're relying on heuristics and you choose one that isn't based in deontological truth you're going to have a hard time where my mind breaks and where I stop because to me so much of this is about narratives where I don't have a narrative that will complete itself is that the Thomas Soul quote seems to be what live out which is over the last 30 years we have exchanged what works for what sounds good yes now the only way that I can sort of make those connect is emotions that the reason we go with what sounds good is it makes me feel better in the immediate term once I have the emotion I'm able to make a decision like you were saying and once I've made the decision I have no reason to change plus every time that you tell me something that sounds wonderful it feels good again yeah uh and so I just stay in but this feels good every time I hear it I use feels good as a proxy for right therefore I head down this path now once you start doing that culture will slowly derange over time and the part that freaks me out is you from where I'm sitting you should just be able to say well hold on tell me what your goal is and then look and see if the policies lead you towards that that goal and if they do keep voting for them and if they don't don't why do you think that breaks down so much good stuff there so first of all there is a theory in psychology that emotion researchers use it's called affect as information it's literally a Uris where you're using your affective State as an informational input in making decisions okay now in many cases that perfectly works well for the exact reason evolutionary reasons that you said right so for example when when my emotional system is triggered because I see three young men loitering in an alley and that raises my blood pressure I get a bit of a a fear response in that context that emotional reaction was perfectly adaptive right on the other hand if I'm trying to solve a calculus problem on a 100% final exam and I start being fearful that's probably not a good response right so I talk in the parastic mind I say that it's not that we are thinking or feeling animals it's that we use the wrong system at the wrong time we invoke the wrong system at the wrong time uh regarding the urtic thing let me just mention one uh if I can get nerdy a bit so my doctoral training uh was in the area of Behavioral decisionmaking and the two of course gurus were tersi Amos tersi and Daniel Conan Daniel Conan won the Nobel prize in economics for his work in psychology of decision-making because he showed that contrary to what classical economists think that we are these perfect calculational machines that engage in an endless utility maximization calculation we don't do that we use Mental shortcuts we use juristic the where I depart from Amos verki and Daniel conman although I'm a huge admirer of theirs is that they didn't root their research in an evolutionary framework so what they did is they they put the homoeconomicus which is the what the classical Economist thinks we ought to behave as rational decision makers and then they put their weapon on that and demonstrated that the classical Economist was wrong but they never explained to us why the architecture of the human mind is built the way that it is so they were missing that evolutionary angle and that's how I eventually tried to marry my original training and behavioral decisionmaking and with an evolutionary framework are are you with me so far y so what was what was I got I got lost in what I was answering so what was what was the question was so I'm trying to figure out why people don't realize oh wait I can look at where I want to go and I can simply ask is this policy or this decision in my life actually taking me to where I want to go I don't understand why people are not obsessed with the outcome they want because I think it's exactly what you said which is in in the immediate temporal window the feeling good is what keeps me going right and and forgive the I'm not trying to engage in Shameless pluging my next book which is not written yet about to sign a a book deal it's called called suicidal empathy well empathy is an emotion right now empathy there are very clear evolutionary reasons why our whole emotional system has evolved right so for example Envy while it while it is part of the seven deadly sins also propels us forward right so when you think about keeping up with the Joneses look at the [ __ ] next door that have the fancy car and they're successful I'm envious of them now maybe that will get me off my fat ass and off the couch so that I can match their signal right so there are so much of the economy is driven by positional Envy right and that's perfectly fine so there are clear evolutionary reasons for why each of the emotions have has evolved the problem is when empathy misfires so in answering your question in a very roundabout way so it's very easy for me because I'm such a progressive kind and compassionate person to say it's unfair that we have the things that we have in the US why should we be globalists and let in anybody who wants to be in on the experience of the American Experience therefore it is racist to have closed Bard borders why not the Guatemalans coming in they're hardworking good people they should be let in there but in this case when you have you you extend that logic at infinum you then have open borders where 20 million people come in and then you end up spending more money on the illegal immigrants that just came in than on American American vets who fought to protect this country right but it's suicidal empathy because I'm a good person I you know the homeless people should not be marginalized and taken away from their encampments where the kids play because that would be a double whammy on them society's already failed them that's why they become D I'm speaking now as a kind and empathetic Progressive and therefore tough luck kids if you have to play around with the uh homeless people while they're shooting up crystal meth and fornicating in in the in the half open tent that's just the price you have to pay for being a tolerant and kind person right uh look this guy has only been arrested 67 times previously don't you think he deserves a 68th chance right because I am kind and empathetic so at at the moment it is always exactly to Thomas Soul's point it's always easier because I'm such a kind and empathetic person to do that rather than what you were looking at which is there's a goal over there and I need to reach it because the the the short window always overpowers the longer goal and hence suicidal empathy I can I can link pretty much every single public policy disaster that you could think of to the misfiring of empathy and let me if I can put it in a a greater uh framework OCD okay obsessive compulsive disorder is the misfiring of an otherwise adaptive mechanism let me explain what I mean by that scanning the environment for environmental threats is a perfectly adaptive thing to do so for example if you start now sneezing and then you shake my hand and I get I recoil with disgust and I go and I wash my hands when you're not looking that makes perfect adaptive sense what doesn't make adaptive sense is for me to spend the next eight hours in scolding hot water until my skin starts peeling off engaging in that ritual right so an Adaptive mechanism becomes maladaptive when it hyperf fires when it misfires why is it hyperf firing now so in in the case of OCD no no no in the case of like what we're going through right now if this is the death of the West is suicidal empathy what created the circumstance that would allow this kind of hyper misfiring or not even necessarily allow but create the Chain Reaction where just keeps looping up so it's it's several factors one of which is self-loathing right so one of the ways that I am Progressive is that it is not okay for me to ever say that the West is is a superior Society to other societies as a matter of fact the way that I show that I'm Progressive is by self- flatulating that we are evil and we're slave owners did that take over CU in the 80s it was America's best [ __ ] get the [ __ ] out of the way and I don't know when that changed so that that's a very good question question so in in the in the parasitic mind I go through all of these parasitic ideas and the the this time stamp for each of them varies from 40 to about 89 years 90 years ago what makes it that they all then seem to appear out of nowhere is that it takes a while for them to simmer in the stew of [ __ ] until there's the perfect cocktail to create the monster that we have now right so take for example cultural relativism cultural relativism is the idea that it is imperialistic of you to apply a deontological principle in judging other societies if other societies say that it is our tradition to cut off the clitorises of 5-year-old girls who are you [ __ ] in Southern California to say that what we do over there is wrong right I mean that's that's literally the statement so s but do you take it as self-evident that that's bad and if so why because shouldn't the 5-year-old have the dignity to have their fundamental conduit to sexual pleasure later in life decided by someone else's religious uh beliefs I mean doesn't doesn't the CH now I hope you're not going to come because usually when I say this someone comes back but aren't you Jewish don't you get circum circumcised okay fair enough that's true the the the H the eight day old boy has not given their consent to have uh the circumcision done on them if I'm going to get jewy on you I would say I would say that that does not stop me in the future from appreciating sex to its fullest cutting many of the genital mutilation that's done on little girls in some of those societies absolutely does reduce if not remove your ability
Resume
Categories