Transcript
mMyZGv_bwTg • The Rocket-Less Future of Space Travel | What the Physics?! | NOVA | PBS
/home/itcorpmy/itcorp.my.id/harry/yt_channel/out/novapbs/.shards/text-0001.zst#text/1024_mMyZGv_bwTg.txt
Kind: captions Language: en imagine taking an elevator to space ideas like this are not purely science fiction Engineers are actually working on developing these why because we might be approaching the limit of what our chemically powered Rockets can do rockets are incredible awe inspiring Feats of engineering they launched about 2500 satellites into space in 2022 and 2023 SpaceX alone launched a rocket about every 4 days in 2023 2 1 ignition and with but Rockets are also super expensive burn massive amounts of fuel and when things go wrong they can lead to disaster and if you look at the physics of what requires them to launch they are also kind of inefficient and here's why today most Rockets are powered by chemical reactions they rely on combinations like liquid hydrogen lh2 and liquid oxygen locks or rocket grade curine rp1 these Rockets have to carry their own Fuel and they need a lot of it to get to space which adds Mass to the rocket in chemically powered Rockets 80 to 90% of the Rocket's mass is just the fuel and you might think to go farther into space you'd just need to carry more fuel but it's not that simple the more fuel you bring on board the more massive the rocket and the bigger the rocket the more fuel you need to get off the ground and Escape Earth's gravity you can see the frustrating relationship in the rocket equation this ratio is the limiting factor it's the mass of the Rockets fully fueled over the mass of it when it was empty during the Apollo program the Saturn 5 rocket had a mass ratio of 23 this means that a fully fueled Saturn 5 rocket was 23 times more massive than when all its fuel was used up now there have been advances in chemically powered Rockets since then though like spacex's Falcon 9 part of that rocket separates from the rest and lands back on a landing pad after launching cargo into space making it the first reusable rocket before that Innovation most rockets that made it to orbit were either destroyed or not recovered at all this Falcon 9 rocket has a mass ratio anywhere between 18 to 30 depending on the mission but even though the ratio might seem low at liftoff most of that is still fuel there it goes there it goes there it goes oh my [Music] gosh imagine how much more cargo or scientific equipment we could send into space if the fuel didn't take up so much room or better yet if we use less fuel or none at all so some Engineers are investigating other methods of space travel which bring brings us to space elevators the physics could actually work but there are some challenges in theory a very long cable would extend from the earth's equator into space anchored by some type of counterweight at the other end like an asteroid or a satellite the whole structure would rotate with the Earth and cargo would be hauled up and down without the need for Rockets but how would the cables stay taught a combination of gravity and centrifugal forces the counterweight at that far end of the cable would need to orbit in sync with the Earth and for that to happen the counterweight would need to be far enough away that the centrifugal force is greater than the gravitational pull of the earth that would happen at about 22,23 miles away from Earth and if the Earthly end were located in the ocean it could potentially be moved around to avoid bad weather or space debris but one big issue is the material the cable would be made with it would need to be built with something super strong able to withstand Earth's gravitational forces atmospheric changes weather and potential collisions with space debris but it also needs to be lightweight and nothing like this currently exists yet but structures called carbon nanot tubes are being explored as a potential material for the tether for their Incredible strength but don't count Rockets out just yet NASA is developing engines powered by nuclear Vision to send astronauts to Mars s nuclear powerered Rockets would be more efficient for long-distance space travel requiring less Fuel and allowing faster speeds but these engines come with challenges including harmful radiation high heat production and complex costly designs from space elevators to nuclear engines the future of space travel might look very different from the rocket launchers we're used to maybe one day chemical Rockets will be a thing of the past and we'll be launching into space in ways we never imagined so what do you think could the future of space travel be rocket [Music] lless thanks for hanging out with us on the Nova channel we've been making this incredible content for more than 50 years if you can believe it we've been able to do that because our viewers help support our work and when they do we' like to thank them with cool stuff if you like what you find on this channel you can be a part of the community of science fans like yourself that make it happen click the join button to find out more thanks for watching and see you again soon