Balaji Srinivasan: How to Fix Government, Twitter, Science, and the FDA | Lex Fridman Podcast #331
VeH7qKZr0WI • 2022-10-20
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions Language: en Donald Trump was probably the biggest person ever to be removed from social media do you understand why that was done Can you steal man the case for it and against it everybody who's watching this around the world basically saw let's say us establishment or democrat alligned folks just decapitate you know the head of state from digitally right like just boom gone okay and they're like well if they can do that in public to the US president who's ably the most powerful in the world what does the Mexican president stand against that nothing regardless of whether it was Justified on this guy that means they will do it to anybody now the seal is broken just like the bailouts as exceptional as they were and the first everybody was shocked by them then they became a policy instrument and now there's bailouts happening every single bill is printing another whatever billion dollars or something like that the following is a conversation with bology s Nason an angel investor Tech founder philosopher and author of the network State how to start a new country he was formerly the CTO of coinbase and general partner at Andre harwoods this conversation is over 7 hours for some folks that's too long for some too short for some just right there are chapter timestamps there are Clips so you can jump around or like I prefer to do with podcasts and audio books I enjoy you can sit down relax with a loved human animal or consumable substance or all three if you like and enjoy the ride from start to finish biology is a fascinating mind who thinks deeply about this world and how we might be able to engineer it in order to maximize the possibility that Humanity flourishes on this fun little planet of ours also you may notice that in this conversation my eye is red that's from Jiu-Jitsu and also if I may say so from a life well lived this is Alex Freedman podcast to support it please check out our sponsors in the description and now dear friends here's biy sason at the core of your belief system is something you call the uh prime number maze I'm curious I'm curious we got we got to start there if we can start anywhere it's with mathematics let's go all right great a rat can be trained to turn at every even number or every third number in a maze to to get some cheese but evidently it can't be trained to turn at prime numbers 2 three five 7 and then 11 and so on and so forth that's just too abstract and frankly if most humans were dropped into a prime number maze they probably wouldn't be able to figure it out either you know they'd have to start counting and so actually pretty difficult to figure out what the the Turning you know rule was yet the rule is actually very simple and so the thing I think about a lot is just how many patterns in life are we just like these rats and we're trapped in a prime number Maze and if we had just a little bit more you know cogitation if we had you know a little bit more cognitive ability a little bit more whether it's uh you know brain machine interface or just better physics we could just figure out the next step in that Prime we could just see it we could just see the grid right and that's what I think about like that that's a big thing that drives me is figuring out how we can actually conceive understand that prime number maze that we're living in so understand which patterns are just complex enough that they are beyond the limit of human cognition yes and uh what do you make of that are the limits of human cognition a feature or a bug I think mostly a bug I admire ranagen I admire uh you know fine men I admired these great mathematicians and physicists who were just able to see things that others couldn't and just by writing it down you know that's that's a Leap Forward you know people talk about it's not the idea it's execution but that's for trivial ideas for great ideas for Max's equations or n's laws or you know Quantum electrodynamics or some of ronen's identities that really does bring us forward especially when you can check them you don't know how they work right you have the phenomenal logical but you don't have the theory underneath it and then that stimulates the advancement of theory to figure out why is this thing actually working that's that's actually you know statch you know arose in part from the kind of phenomenological studies that were basically being done where people are just getting steam engines and so on to work and then they kind of abstracted out thermodynamics and so on from that right so the the practice led the theory rather than vice versa to some extent that's happening in neural networks now as you're aware right and I think that's um so just something that's true and that works you if we don't know yet that's amazing and that pulls us forward so I I do think that the limits are are more of a bug than a feature is something that humans will never be able to figure out about our universe about the theory about the practice of our universe yeah people will typically quote cell's incompleteness with for such a question and uh yeah there are things that are provably unknowable or provably unprovable um but I think you can often get an approximate solution you know the the hbert you know you know Hilbert's problems like we will know we must know uh at least we should know that we can know push to get at least an approximate solution push to know that we no at least we push back that Darkness enough so that we have lit up that corner of the intellectual Universe okay let's actually take a bit of a tangent and explore bit in a way that I did not expect we would but let's talk about the nature of reality briefly I don't know if you're familiar with the work of Don Hoffman no I don't I know Roger Penrose has like his Road to Reality series for like basic physics getting up to everything we know but go ahead tell me it's even Wilder yeah in modern physics we start to question of what is fundamental and what is emergent in this beautiful Universe of ours and there's a bunch of folks who think that SpaceTime as we know it the four-dimensional space is emergent it's not fundamental to the physics of the universe and the same many argue I think Sean Carol is one of them is that time itself the way we experience it is also emergent it's not fundamental to the way our universe works anyway those are uh the technical term I apologize for swearing those are the mind fucks of uh modern physics but if we stroll along that road further we get somebody like Donald Hoffman who makes the evolutionary case that the reality we perceive with our eyes is not only an abstraction of objective reality but it's actually completely detached like we're in a video game essentially that's uh consistent between each uh consistent for All Humans but it doesn't it's not at all connected to physical reality so it's an version of the simulation hypothesis is that his in a very distant way but uh the simulation says that there's a sort of computational nature to reality and then there's a kind of a programmer that creates this reality and so on now he's he says that we humans have a brain that is able to perceive the environment and uh evolution is produced from primitive life to complex life on Earth produce the kind of brain that doesn't at all need to sense the reality uh directly so like this table according to Donald Hoffman is not there well so like not not just as an abstraction like we don't sense the molecules that make up the table but all of this is fake interesting so I you know I I tend to be more of a hard science person right and so um you know so just on that people talk about qualia you know like is your perception of green the different from different from my perception of green and you know my counterargument on that is well we know something about you know spectrum of light and we can build artificial eyes and if we can build artificial eyes which we can you know they're like they're not amazing but you can actually you can do that you can build artificial ears and so on obviously we can build recording devices and you know for cameras and things like that well operationally the whole concept of your perception of green you see green as purple I see green is green or what I call Green doesn't seem to add up because it does seem like we can do engineering around it right so the Hoffman thing I get why people more broadly will talk about a simulation hypothesis because you know it's like fan many others have talked about how uh math is surprisingly useful to describe the world you know like very simple equations give rise to these complex phenomena wfr is also on this um from from a different angle with the cellular autometer stuff but um it's almost suspicious how well it works yeah but on the other hand it's like uh you know it it is yet we're still also in a prime number maze you know there's things we just don't understand and um you know so Al so the within the constraints of the non-prime numbers we find math to be extremely effective surprisingly effective yeah exactly so maybe maybe the math we have gets us through the equivalent of the even turns and the odd turns but there's math we don't yet have that is more complex or more complex rules for otherwi just play all R just rats and OCC I know that gets like very abstract but you know there are unsolved problems and in physics you know like the condensed matter space there's a lot of interesting stuff happening my recollection I maybe you know out of date on this like things like son and luminescence we don't know exactly how they work and sometimes those things that are like at the edges of physics you know in the late 1800s I think Rutherford somebody I think it rord said you know basically all physics is being discovered Etc and that was obviously before quantum mechanics you know that that sort of edge case people looking at the bomber and the passion series and seeing you know this weird thing you know with with the hydrogen spectrum and it was quantized and you know that led to uh like the sort of phenomenological set of observations that led to quantum mechanics and and and everything and you know sometimes I think the UAP stuff might be like that right people immediately go to aliens for UAP like the unidentified aerial phenomena right and people have been uh there's surprising amount of stuff out there on this the UK has Declassified a bunch of material you know Harry Reid was a sendor has talked about this it's not an obviously it's not an obviously political thing it it which is good it's something that is is there something happening there right and people had thought for a long time that the UAP thing was a like American um kind of counter propaganda to cover up their new spy planes that were spying over the Soviet Union to make anybody who talked about them seem you know crazy and and and hysterical or whatever but if the UAP thing is real it could be atmospheric phenomena like you know like the Aurora Borealis or the northern lights but some things we don't understand it could be something like the uh the bomber and passion series uh you know which were the observations of like emission Spectra before quantum mechanics so that's like another option as opposed to doesn't exist or Little Green Men it could be physics we don't understand yet as one possibility do you think there's alien civilizations out there so there's a lot of folks who have kind of ridden and talked about this is you know the Drake equation which is like you know the multiplying all the probabilities together there's perhaps more sophisticated takes like the uh the Dark Forest you know which says that if the universe is like a dark Forest we're the dumb ones that aren't hiding our presence um there's one calculation I saw I haven't reproduced it myself but basically says that the uh the assumption that other civilizations have seen ours is wrong because when you have like a spherical radius for like the you know electromagnetic radiation that's leaving our planet as that sphere gets larger and larger it gets like smaller and smaller amounts of energy so you know you get farther out you're you're not getting enough um you know uh you know photons or or what have you to to actually uh detect it um you know I don't know I actually haven't looked into the math behind it but I remember remember seeing that argument so actually it is possible that it's so diffuse when you go past a certain you know number of light years out that people you know then alien civilization wouldn't be able to detect it right that's that's another argument that's more basically about signals from them from us to be able to signals colliding enough to uh find the signal from the noise right exactly intelligence signal yeah Hansen Hansen has an article called grabby aliens um have you seen his thing this right and so there he's been on this podcast oh great he's brilliant I like him he he pushes you know boundaries in interesting ways in every ways in all of the ways in all the ways that's right I I I like him overall he's he's you know he he's an net Andy grabby aliens so he he has he has this interesting idea that uh the civilizations uh quickly learn how to travel close to the speed of light right so we're not going to see them until they're here yeah that's possible I mean one of the things is so here's for example a mystery that we haven't yet Done Right which or we haven't really figured out yet which is um a biogenesis in the lab right we've done lots of things where we you've got you can show macro molecules binding to each other you can show you know evidence for the so-called RNA world abiogenesis is to go from you know like non-life to life right in the lab you can show micro Evolution obviously with bacteria you can do artificial selection on them lots of other aspects of um you know fundamental you know biochemistry origins of Life stuff have been established there's a lot of plausibility arguments about the Primitive environment and nitrogens and carbons snapping together to get you know the you know the RNA world is the the the initial hypothesis but to my knowledge at least we haven't actually seen a biogenesis demonstrated now one argument is you need just like this massive world with uh you know so many different reps before that actually happens and um one possibility is if we could do atomic level you know simulations of molecules bouncing against each other it's possible that in some simulation we could find a path a reproducible path a biogenesis and then just you know replicate that in the lab right um I I don't know okay uh but that seems to me to be like a mystery that we still don't fully understand like an example of the prime number maze right one of the most fascinating Mysteries one of the most important y yeah and and again there may be some biochemist who's like oh B you you know about X Y and Z that happened in the aogen field I I freely confess I'm not like at you know urant on it the last thing I remember looking at it isant mean like up to the moment oh nice that's a nice word that's a aant yeah I'm probably mispronouncing it but um we'll edit it and post to pronounce correctly with AI yeah yeah we we'll copy your voice and you will pronounce it perfectly correctly yeah in post one thing that I do think was interesting is uh Craig Venter a while back tried to make a minimum viable cell um where he just tried to delete all of the genes that were that were not considered essential and so it's like a new life form and this was like almost 20 years ago and so on and that thing was a was was viable in the lab right and so it's possible that you could you kind of reverse engineer so you're coming at the problem from different directions like RNA molecules can do quite a lot you've got some you know reasonable assumptions as to how that could come together uh you've got like sort of strip down minimum viable life forms and so there's it's not there isn't stuff here you can see micro Evolution you can see at the sequence level you know if you do molecular phalogenics you can actually track back the bases there's actually so it's not like there's no evidence here there's a lot of tools to work with but this in my view is a fascinating area and actually also relevant to AI because another form of a biogenesis would be if we were able to give rise to a different branch of life form the Silicon based as opposed to carbon based you know to to stretch a point um you give rise to something that actually does meet the definition of life for some definition of life right what do you think that definition is for an artificial life form because you mentioned Consciousness yeah when will it give us pause that we created something that feels by some definition or by some spiritual poetic romantic philosophical mathematical definition that it is alive right and we would want to kill it so couple of remarks on that one is um Francis Crick of of Watson and Crick uh before he died I think his last paper was published on something called the claustrum okay and the thing is that you know sometimes in biology or in any you know domain people are sort of discouraged from going after the big the big questions right but he proposed the claustrum is actually the organ that is the seat of Consciousness it's like this sheath that like covers the brain and uh for mice if you and and again I may be recollecting this wrong so but you can look better it my recollection is um in mice if you disrupt this the mouse is like very disoriented right it's like it it's the kind of thing which you know Watson and Crick were all about structure implies function right they found the structure of DNA this amazing thing and you know they remarked In This Very under understated way at the end of the paper that well obviously this uh gives a basis for how the genetic material might be replicated and error corrected because you know Helix un wines and you CAU right so he was a big structure function person and that applies not just at the protein level not just at the level of DNA but potentially also at the level of organs like the claustrum is kind of this system integrating level right it's like the the last layer in the neural network or something you know um and uh and so that's that's a kind of thing that I think is worth studying um so Consciousness is another kind of big a biogenesis is a big question the prime number am Consciousness is a big question um and uh you know than definition of life right uh there's folks gosh there's I think so this one is something I'd have to Google around but there was a guy I think at Santa Fe Institute or something who had some definition of life and like some thermodynamic definition um but you're right that it's going to be a multi-feature definition we might have a touring test like definition frankly which is just if enough humans agree it's alive it's alive right and that might frankly be the operational definition because you know viruses are like this boundary case you know are they are they alive or not most people don't think they're alive but they're they're they're on they're kind of they're more alive than a rock in a sense well I think uh in a world that we'll talk about today quite a bit which is the digital world I think the most fascinating philosophically and technically definition of Life Is Life in the digital world mhm so chatbots essentially creatures whether they're replicas of humans or totally independent Creations perhaps in an automatic way I think there's going to be chat Bots that would ethically be troubled by if we wanted to kill them they would have the capacity to suffer they would be very unhappy with you trying to turn them off and then there will be large groups of activists that will protest and they'll go to the Supreme Court of whatever the Supreme Court looks like in in uh 10 20 30 40 years and they will uh demand that these chat Bots would have the same rights as us humans do you think that's possible I saw that Google engineer who was basically saying this had already happened and I I I was surprised by it because it just I when I looked at the chat logs of it it didn't seem particularly interesting on other hand I can definitely see I mean gp3 for people who you know haven't paying attention shows that serious step ups are possible and obviously you know you've talked about a in your podcast a ton um is it possible that GPT 9 or something is is kind of like that or gpt1 15 or GPT 4 maybe but you for people just listening there's a deep skepticism in your face yeah you know the reason being because um you know what's possible is possible that you have like a partition of society on literally this basis you know um that's one model where there's some people just like there's vegetarians and non-vegetarians right there may be um machines have life and machines are machines you know like or something like that right uh you know you could you could definitely imagine some kind of partition like that in the future where your fundamental political social system that's a foundational assumption and you know is a a i does it you know deserve the same rights as like a human or for example a corporation is in intermediate uh do you see that thing which is how human is are different corporations have you seen that infographic it's actually funny so it's like Spectrum there's a spectrum so for example Disney is considered about as human as like a dog but like exgon I may remembering this wrong but they had like a level with like human at one end and like rock at the other do have to do with corporate structure what what I think it's about people's empathy for that Corporation their brand identity but it's interesting to see that first of all people sort of do think of Corporations as being more or Le like The Branding is really what they're responding to well that's what I mean they're also responding you know I have a brand of human that I'm trying to sell MH and it seems to be effective for the most part sure although it has become like a running joke that I might be a robot right which means there's the brand is cracking could it's seeping through but I mean in that sense I just I think uh I don't see a reason why chatbots can't manufacture the brand of Being Human of being sensient I mean that is the touring test but it's like the multiplayer touring test now that actually a fair number of chat Bots have pass the touring test I'd say there's at least two steps up right one is um a multiplayer touring test where you have chatbots talking to each other and then you ask can you determine the difference between in chat Bots talking to each other and clicking buttons and stuff and apps and and humans doing that and I think we're very far off I shouldn't say very far off at least I don't know how far off we are in terms of time but we're still far off in terms of a group of End chat Bots looking like their digital output is like the group of Inhumans like a go from the T Test to the multiplayer T Test that's one definition another definition is you know to be able to kind of swap in and you're not just convincing one human that this is a human for a small you know session you're convincing all humans that this is a human for end sessions remote work actually makes this possible right that's another definition of a multiplayer Turing test where basically you have a chatbot that's fully automated that is earning money for you as an intelligent agent on a computer that's able to go and get remote work jobs and so on I would consider that next level right if you could have something that was like that that was competent enough to I me because everything on the computer can be automated right literally you could be totally hands-free just like autonomous driving you could have autonomous earning as a challenge problem if you were Microsoft or apple and you had legitimate access to the operating system just like apple says can you send me details of this event a decentralized thing could in theory log you know the actions of 10,000 or 100,000 or a million people and with cryptocurrency you could even monitor a wallet that was on that computer and you could see you know what long run series of actions were increasing or decreasing this digital balance you see what I'm saying right so you start to get at least conceptually it'd be invasive and and you know there' be a privacy issue and so on conceptually you could imagine an agent that could learn what actions humans were doing that resulted in the increase of their local cryptocurrency balance okay there may be better ways to formulate it but that I consider a challenge problem is to go from the touring test to a genuine intelligent agent that can actually go and make money for you if you can do that that's a big deal people obviously have trading Bots and stuff but that would be you know the next level it's typing out emails it's creating documents it's actually it'll mimic human behavior in its entirety yeah that's right and it can it'll schedule zooms it'll send emails it'll essentially because if you think about it a human is hitting the keys and clicking the mouse but just like a self-driving car the wheel rotates by itself right those keys are effectively just it's like a like the automator app in in apple right um everything's just on the screen you're seeing it there and it's just an AI it's kind of hilarious that the I'm not a robot click thing actually works cuz I I I actually don't know how how that's happen how it works but I think it has to do with the movement of the mouse the timing and they know that it's very difficult for currently for a bot to mimic human behavior in the way they would click that little checkbox yeah exactly I think it's something I mean uh again my recollection on that is it's like a pile of Highly OB fiscated JavaScript with all kind it looks like a very simple box but it's doing a lot of stuff and it's collecting all kinds of instrumentation and yeah exactly like a like a robot is just a little too deterministic or if it's got noise it's like gaussian noise and the way humans do it is just not something that you'd eily be able to do without collecting thousands and thousands and thousands of human traces doing it but it is a predator prey on that goad and then the computer or millions of human traces I don't know the computer just sees the JavaScript it needs to be able to look outside the simulation for the computer the world is like it doesn't the computer doesn't know about the physical world so has to look outside of its world and introspect back on this simple box right is which is kind of you know I think that's exactly what mushrooms do or like psychedelics is you get to go outside and look back in and that's what a computer needs to do I you know I do wonder whether they actually give people Insight or they give people the illusion of insight um is there a difference yeah because well actual Insight you know actual Insight is again maxell's equations you're you're able to shift the world with that there's a lot of practical devices that work the illusion of insight is I'm Jesus Christ and nothing happens right so I don't know I think those are quite different uh I don't know I I think you can fake it till you make it on that one which is um Insight in some sense is revealing a truth that was there all along yeah so I mean I guess like I'm talking about technical Insight where you you have this is the thing you know we were talking about actually before the podcast like technical truths versus political truths right some truths they're they're on a spectrum and there's some truths that are actually entirely political in the sense that if you can change the software in enough people's heads you change the the value of the truth for example the location of a border is effectively consensus between large enough groups of people uh who is the CEO that's you know consensus a certain group of people what is the value of a currency or any stock right that that market price is just the psychology of a bunch of people like literally if you can change enough people's minds you can change the value of the Border or the position of the hierarchy or the value of the currency those are purely political truths then all the way on the other end are technical truths that exist independent of whatever any one human or All Humans think like uh the gravitational constant right or the diameter of a virus those those are just those exist independent of the human mind changing few Minds doesn't matter those those remain constant and um then you have things that are interestingly in the Middle where cryptocurrency has tried to pull more and more things from the domain of political truds into technical truds where they say okay the one social convention we have is um that if you hold this amount of Bitcoin or or that if you hold this private key you hold this Bitcoin and then we make that very hard to change because you have to change a lot of technical TRS so you can push things to this interesting intermediate Zone the question is how how how much of our world can we push into that right and that takes us in a nonlinear fascinating Journey to the question I wanted to ask you in the beginning which is um this political world that you mention in the world of political truth as we know it in the 20th century in the early 24st Century what do you think works well and what is broken about government the fun thing is that we can't easily and peacefully start new opt-in governments and like startup governments yeah and what do I mean by that is basically um you can start a new company you can start a new community you can start a new currency even these days you don't have to beat the former CEO in a duel to start a new company um you don't have to become head of the World Bank to start a new currency okay um because of this yes if you can if if you're if you want to you can join I don't know uh Microsoft or name some company that's a GameStop and you can try to reform it okay or you can start your own and the fact that both options exist mean that you know you've you can actually just start from scratch and that's just I mean the same reason we have a clean piece of paper right I mentioned this actually in in the network State book I'll just quote this bit but we want to be able to start a new state peacefully for the same reason we want a bare plot of Earth a blank sheet of paper an empty text buffer a fresh starp or a clean slate because we want to build something new without historical constraint right for the same reason you hit plus and do docs. new you know like create a new Doc it's for the same reason right because you don't to backspace you don't to have just like 128 bytes of space 128 kilobytes and just have to backspace the old document before creating the new one so that's a fundamental thing that's wrong with today's governments and it's a meta point right because it's not any one specific reform it's a meta reform being able to start new countries okay so that's one problem but there you know you could push back and say that's that's a feature because you know a lot of people argue that tradition is power through generation if you try a thing long enough which is the way I see marriage there's value to the struggle and the journey you take through the struggle and you grow and you develop ideas together you grow intellectually philosophically together and that's the idea of a Nations that spans Generations that you have have a tradition that becomes more that that strives towards the truth and is able to arrive there or no not arrive but take steps towards there through the generations so you may not want to keep starting new governments you may want to uh stick to the old one and uh improve it one step at a time so just because you're having a fight inside a marriage doesn't mean you should get a divorce and go on Tinder and started dating around that's the uh that's the push back so it's it's not obvious that this a strong future to have to launch new governments there's several different kind of lines of attack or or debate or whatever on this right first is uh yes there's obviously value to tradition and uh you know people say this is Lindy and that's Lindy it's been proven for a long time and so on but of course there's a tension between tradition and Innovation you know like going to the Moon wasn't Lindy just it was awesome and you know like artificial intelligence is something that's very new new is good right and this is a tension within Humanity actually itself because you know it's way older than all of these nations I mean humans are tens of thousands of years old the answers of humans are millions of years old right and you go back far enough and the time that we know today of the cile farmer and Soldier is if you go back far enough you want to be truly traditional well actually descended from hunter gatherers who were mobile and wandered the world and there weren't borders and so on they kind of went where they want right and you know people have you know had done historical reconstructions of like skeletons and and stuff like that and uh many folks report that the transition to Agriculture and being cile um resulted in you know dimition of height you know people had like tooth decay and stuff like that the skeletons people had traded off upside for stability right that's what the state was that was what these cile kinds of things were now of course um they they had more likelihood of living uh consistently you could support larger population sizes but it had lower quality of life right and so the hunter gatherer you know maybe that's actually our Collective recollection of a Garden of Eden where people you know just like a a spider kind of knows innately how to build webs or a beaver knows how to build dams you know some people theorize that uh the entire Garden of Eden is like um a sort of built-in neural network recollection of this you know pre sessile era where we able to roam around just pick off fruits and so on low population density so point is that I think what we're seeing is a V3 you go from the hunter gatherer to the farmer and Soldier the cesil nations are here and they've got borders and so on to kind of the V3 which is the digital Nomad the new hunter gatherer we're going back to the future because you know it's even older than Nations is no Nations right even more traditional than tradition is you know being International right and so we're actually tapping into that other huge thread in humanity which is the desire to explore Pioneer wander innovate you know I that's important way to make America great again is to dissolve it completely into Oblivion no that's a joke see yeah I know it's a joke but the thing well humor I'm learning this new thing yes the new thing for the the chapot emulation isn't fully working there yeah yeah glitch that's we're in the in the beta and let me say say one other thing about this which is you know there are I mean everybody in the world to for okay let's say I don't know what percentage let's say 99.99% uh it's rounds to that number of political discourse in the US focuses on trying to fix the system if those folks I mean 0.01% of the energy is going towards building a new system that seems like a pretty good portfolio strategy right or 100% are supposed to go and edit this codebase from 200 something years ago I mean the most American in the world is going and you know leaving your country in in search of a better life America was founded 200 years ago by the founding fathers it's not just a nation of immigrants it's a nation of immigrants right IM immigration you know from other countries to the US and actually also immigration within the US there's this amazing YouTube video called um it's like 50 states US population I think 1790 to it says 2050 they've got a simulation so you just stop it at 2019 or 2020 but it shows that like Virginia was like number one early on and then it lost ground and like New York gained and then like Ohio was a big deal in the early 1800s and it was like father of presidents and general all these presidents and later Illinois and Indiana and then California only really came up in the the 20th century like during the Great Depression and now we're entering the modern era where like Florida and Texas have risen and New York and California have dropped and so Interstate competition it's actually just like inter currency competition you know you've got trading pairs right you you know sell BTC by eth you sell you know salon or Z you know sell Monero buy zcash right each of those trading pairs gives you signal for today on this currency is down or up relative to this other currency in the same way each of those migration pairs someone goes from New York to Ohio Ohio to California gives you information on the desirability of different states you can literally form a pairs Matrix like this over time U very much like the link Matrix that's shaped America in a huge way and so you know you you ask a if if this nation of immigrants that was founded by men younger than us by the way the founding fathers were often in their 20s right who um you know endorse the concept of proposition Nation who've given rise to a country of Founders and and Pioneers uh who've literally gone to the Moon right um those folks would think that this is the end of history that that's it we're done like we've we've done everything else I mean there's people in technology who believe and I agree with them that we can go to Mars that we might be able to end death but we can't innovate on something that was 230 years old you know so there is a balance certainly to to strike the the American experiment is fascinating nevertheless so one argument you can make is actually that we're in the very early days of this V2 if so what you describe as V2 you could make the case that we're not ready for V3 that we're just actually uh trying to figure out the V2 thing you're trying to like skip when are we ever ready now again we go go back to marriage I think and and having kids kind of thing I think everyone who has kids is never really ready to be kids that's the whole point you dive in okay but the I mean you you mentioned that you can laun is there other criticisms of government that you can provide as we know today before we kind of outline the ideas of of V3 let's stick to V2 I'll give a few right and so a lot of the stuff will go into the version so I've got you know this book the network State um which which covers some of these topics does Network State have a subtitle um it is uh the network State how to start a new country how to start a new country and but um I just have it at the network state.com I should say it's an excellent book that you should get I read it on Kindle but there's also a website and uh BAGI said that is constantly working on improving it changing it by by the by the time the whole project is over it'll be a different book than it was yeah in the beginning it's always shedding its old skin well I I wanted to get something out there and get feedback and and what not just like an app right you know you again you have these two polls of an app is highly Dynamic and you're you're accustomed to having updates all the time and a book is supposed to be static and there's a value in something static something unchanged and so on but in this case I'm glad I kind of shipped a version 1.0 and uh you know the the next version um you know I'm going to split into like uh tentatively motivation theory and practice like motivation like what is the sort of political philosophy and so on that motivates me at least to do this which you can take or leave right and then Theory as to why Network state is now possible and I can Define it in a second and then the practice is zillions of practical details and everything from roads to diplomatic recognition and so on um funding founding all that stuff a lot of the stuff actually I left out of V1 simply because I wanted to kind of get the desirability of it on the table and then talk about the the feasibility and I should actually on that briefly in in terms of things you can revolutionize like um one of the biggest Innovations I think that Tesla does with the way they think about the car way they deploy the car is not the automation or the electric to me it's the uh over theair updates mhm right be able to send instantaneously uh updates to the software that completely changes the behavior the ux everything about the car and so I do think it be interesting cuz books are a representation of human knowledge a um a snapshot of human knowledge and it would be interesting that we if we can somehow figure out a system that allows you to do sort of like a GitHub for books like if I buy a book on Amazon without having to pay again can I get updates like V point v1.1 v1.2 and there's like release notes right that that would be that would be incredible inredible it's not not enough to do like a second edition or a third edition but like minor updates that's not just on your website but actually go into the the model that we used to buy books right so I spent my money maybe I I'll do a subscription service for five bucks a month where I get regular updates to the books and then there's an incentive for authors to actually update their books such that it makes sense for the subscription and that that means your book isn't just a snap shot but it's a lifelong project right if you care enough about the book so I think there's a lot that can be done there because actually in going through this process in many ways the most traditional thing I did was a self-published eBook on Kindle right uh why because basically like you know if you actually ink a deal with a book publisher first they you know they'll give you some advance I I didn't need the advance or anything but second is all these constraints um oh you know you want to translate into this or you want to do this other format or we want to update it you have to go and now talk to this other party right you know and uh also the the narrowing window of what they'll actually publish it gets narrow and narrower you see all these you know meltdowns over young adult novels and stuff on Twitter but it's it's it's more than that so you know actually having an Amazon page it's just like a marker that a book exists okay and uh now I've got an entry point where if someone says okay I like this tweet but how do I kind of get the um that that might be a concept from like the the middle of chapter 3 right how do I get the thing from front to back I can just point them at the network.com that is import this right this one entry point okay and um you mentioned like subscription and and and money and so and so forth and I think people are paying for Content online now with News letters and so on but I've chosen to and I will always have the thing free um and I want it on you can get the Kindle version on Amazon simply because that you have to kind of set a price for that but the network state.com what I want to do is have that optimized for free Android phone so people in India or Latin America or Nigeria can just tap and open it going to do translations and stuff like that uh Greg foder of alpace VR you know founder of old space VR you know he sold that and uh he coded the website and um you know work with him on it and there's another designer who um Elijah and uh it's basically just a three-person group and we thought we had something pretty nice but one thing I was really uh pleasantly surprised by is how many people got in touch with us afterwards and asked us if we could open source the software to create this this website right because it's actually you you can try it on mobile I think it's actually um in some ways a better experience than kindall and uh so that was interesting because um I do think of the website as like a V1 version of uh this concept of a book app right for example imagine if you have the Bible and the Ten Commandments aren't just text but there's like a checklist and there's a gateway to a Christian Community there and um you know the practice is embedded into the thing you know like do you know brilliant.org amazing site I love this site brilliant is basically mobile friendly tutorials and you can kind of just swipe through you know you're in the line at Starbucks or you know getting on a plane or something you just swipe through and just get really nice micro lessons on things and it's just interactive enough that your brain is working and you're problem solving and uh sometimes you'll need a little pen and paper but that format um of sort of very mobile friendly just continuous learning I i' I'd like to do a lot more with that and so that's kind of where we're going to go with the the book app so the there's a lot of fun stuff about the way you did at least V1 of the book which is you have like a one sentence summary one paragraph summary tldr and like one image summary which is um I think honestly it's not even about a short attention span it's a really good exercise about summarization condensation and really like helping you think through what is the key Insight like we mentioned the the prime number in maze that reveals something Central to The Human Condition which is struggling against the limitation of our of our minds and in that same way you summarize the network state in the book Let's actually jump right there and let me ask you what is the network State what is the network state so I'll give it a sentence and also give it an image right so the informal sentence a network state is a highly aligned online community with a capacity for Collective action that crowdfunds territory around the world and eventually gains diplomatic recognition from pre-existing States okay so just taking those pieces highly aligned online community that is not Facebook that is not Twitter people don't think of themselves as facebookers or twitteri right that's just a collection of hundreds of millions of people who just fight each other all day right It's a Fight Club a company is highly aligned where you know you'll put a task into the company slack and on the if you do in all hands about 100% of of the people in a company slack will do it so they're highly aligned that way but online communities don't tend to be highly aligned online communities tend to be like a Game of Thrones fan club or something like that or you know a Twitter account you might get 0.1% of people engaging with something it's not the 100% if you combine the degree of alignment of a company with the scale of a community that's like what a highly aligned you know online community is right start to get it that or 10,000 people who can collectively do something as simple as just all liking something on Twitter for example why would they do that they're they're Guild of electrical engineers they're a guild of graphic designers and you've got a thousand people in this Guild and every day somebody is asking a favor from The Guild and the other 999 people are helping them out for example I've just launched a new project or I'd like to get a new job can somebody help me and so on and so you kind of give to get you're you know you're helping other people in the community and you're kind of building up Karma this way and then some you spend it down like stack Overflow has this Karma economy it's not meant to be an internal economy that is um like making tons and tons of money off of is sort of to keep score right that's a highly align online community part then capacity for Collective action I just kind of described that which is at a minimum you you don't have a highly aligned online community unless you have a thousand people and you paste in a tweet and a thousand of them RT it or or like it okay if you can't even get that you don't have something if you do have that you have the basis for at least Collective digital action on something okay and you can think of this as a group of activists you can think of it as for example let's say I mentioned a guild but let's say there a group that wants to raise awareness of the fact that life extension is possible right every day there's a new um tweet on I don't know whether it's uh met foran research or Sinclair's work or David Sinclair right Andrew hubman has good stuff here you know or um there's a longevity VC there's a bunch of folks work in this area every day there's something there and literally the purpose of this online community is r r of longevity and of the thousand people 970 go and like that that's pretty good right that's solid you've got something there you've got you've got a laser right you've got something which you focus on something because most of the web 2 internet is entropic you go to Hacker News you go to Reddit you go to Twitter and you're immediately struck by the fact it's like 30 random things random it's just a box of chocolates it's meant to be you know we're some of them look delicious some look delicious novelty we can overc consume novelty right so you know what we were talking about earlier the balance between tradition and Innovation right here is a different version of that which is um entropy going in a ton of different directions due to novelty versus uh like Focus you know it's like it's like Heat versus work you know heat is entropic and work force along a distance you're going in in a direction right and so if those 30 links on you know the next version of Hacker News or red or something like so brilliant is just that's leveling you up the the 30 things you click you've just gained a skill as a function of that right so these kinds of online communities I
Resume
Categories