Food Lies You Believe! - Truth About Protein, Muscle, Alcohol & Exercise For Longevity | Peter Attia
TR3S7M85dgU • 2024-01-26
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions Language: en ketogenics was something it really was transformational and as I discovered ketogenics through you I'm very curious to hear um you no longer feel the same that you did what changed well it's a broad topic I think around that of dietary restriction so I think my aperture has just widened significantly so you have to take a step way back and ask the question how does one what are the ways in which one can change their diet so let's come back to your example in a moment because I think if I recall when you went on a ketogenic diet it wasn't in an effort to lose weight no yeah so let's put your case aside for a moment and instead discuss it through the lens of how most people think about ketogenic diets vegan diets pick your diets it's it's usually some form of energy restriction so I think initially I was like most people are pretty myopic about my views of energy restriction and over time that thinking evolved into saying look there are really broadly speaking three strategies to reduce intake one strategy is to just directly fixate on the reduction of energy intake that's called caloric restriction so bodybuilders are a great example of this right like they really really know how to weigh and measure every single thing they're eating and they certainly understand during an anabolic phase this is how much energy I need during a catabolic phase or cutting phase I need this much and they've got this down to a science and it's really remarkable I mean it but it's a science optimized for the reduction of fat that's right that's right and maintenance of muscle that's exactly right longevity right for anybody so so but but let's be clear like I don't think there's a better example of any type of person on the planet that's figured out how to control intake up and down and to produce a perfect result with respect to that aesthetic MH well said and for most people that's really hard to do um it's hard to do because you can't really ignore it like you can't just eat without thinking you always have to be paying attention to what you're doing but it is the most direct way to go about getting the result you want so that's method one method two says how about I don't pay attention to what I'm eating or when I'm eating um but I pay attention pardon me how about I don't pay attention to what I'm eating or uh how much I'm eating but I just pay attention to when I eat so that's called time restriction people call that intermittent fasting and if I make the window in which I eat small enough um I will reduce energy intake in total so if I said to you you know you can only have one meal a day chances are you are going to lose weight um now people thought that well there must be something magical about intermittent fasting beyond the caloric reduction but that turns out to not be the case it's been tested in several uh studies now and it's clear that if you eat 2,000 calories in one sitting it's no better or worse for you uh at least from a weight perspective than if you eat 2,000 calories spread out of the course of a day it's probably worse for you in another way though which is you're a little more likely to lose muscle mass because you won't be able to get the right amount of amino acids into your muscles I I don't want to derail your point but we are going to have to talk about autophagy cuz I intermittent fast like a fiend great we'll 35 y okay so then we get to the third method of caloric reduction which is the use of what's called dietary restriction so here we pick things within the diet and we cut them out and the more restrictive that is the more likely it is to produce an energy reduction and therefore the more likely you are to achieve the goal of weight loss so the glib example I always give is if you went on the no lettuce diet you would not lose an ounce right right it's simply not restrictive enough if you went on the only potato diet you would lose an insane amount of weight you simply couldn't eat enough potatoes to maintain now the that's not a healthy diet right no one would think that the all potato diet is going to produce an ideal Health outcome but you will lose a lot of weight right so keto is simply a very for a restrictive form of that diet and many people lose a lot of weight on a ketogenic diet because they are limiting so many things right they're limiting so many carbs it's also for many people much more satiating so it actually readily reduces their hunger and so they simply don't want to eat more so they have fewer food choices and they don't want to eat as much but you can gain weight on a ketogenic diet if you eat a lot you have to be careful because you're generally eating more energy-dense Foods on a ketogenic diet and I've seen lots of people blow up on ketogenic diets because they somehow think it's a license to eat as much fat as they want not the case so now let's talk about so so that's that sort of coming to that conclusion made me realize oh well there's nothing really magical about any particular diet when it comes to energy balance but now each of these diets has their own tradeoffs around other metrics of health so for example we talked about the importance of protein protein is I think the most important of the macronutrients I know everybody wants to argue about fat and carbs but I think the the game is one and lost with protein and you know the recommended dietary allowance of protein is unfortunately very low so there's most people are being told to eat 8 grams per kilogram of body weight and that's literally half what you need to be eating whoa yeah that's the amount of protein for body mass that I carry or ideal body mass total body weight hm yeah so if I at 6 foot weighed 250 lb I'm going to be wanting to eat something like 1.6x that in protein in kilograms so yeah so if you were if you weighed if you were whatever 200 lb I would want you consuming at least 16 g of protein and maybe closer to 200 depending on your demand and depending on your age and depending on the type of protein you're getting so a lot of different diets let's pick two that I think one has to be they're doable but you have to be careful about getting enough protein so let's start with a plant-based diet so a plant-based diet by definition you can't have any animal protein so all of a sudden you're doing away with the best form of amino acids you know one could argue that when we eat animals or animal protein it is a more pure synthesis of the amino acids that are coming from Plants right so like a cow all it's eating is plant but you eat a cow or like venison is one of my favorite things right so I'm eating wild venison from Hawaii that only eats grass and yet it's the richest source of amino acids I can sink my teeth into in other words its digestive system its metabolism is doing this remarkable thing I can't do which is turning grass into the richest densest source of protein if I want to go back and eat the grass it's fine but I just have to acknowledge I'm going to have to eat a lot more of it because it's not a great source of protein so the bioavailability of plant protein is about 70% that of animal protein and it's not as rich in the most important amino acids so when we have patients who are plant-based and they say oh do I have to give up my plant-based diet I say not necessarily um and if it's working for you in all other ways other than this then there's a workaround here but the workaround requires you being very deliberate about your protein quantity another example is you so we're going to come back to the case that you just said which is what about people who are imminently fasting do they have to you know is that a bad thing is that a good thing well it depends but if a person is intermittently fasting you're going to see a lot of muscle loss unless they're very thoughtful about their protein intake so you know if a person's intermittently fast lasting 168 you can generally get away with it cuz in 8 hours you can get usually at least three good servings of protein but we have a lot of people who are intermittently fasting and they're only eating two meals no snacks they can't come close to getting the right amount of protein in because you can't have let's just say you're on the 160 gram a day program 80 grams twice in your day is not going to cut it because you can't put 80 gram to work it's too much protein for the body to Peter man this is so different than how I live well no but think about it like bodybuilders are very thoughtful of this right if you look at bodybuilders I thought we debunked all the like six meals a day and you're saying no like I actually do need to break it back up in smaller pie if you're optimizing for muscle mass yes and it can't be too small so this is where it gets really crazy if you're eating really small amounts of protein like 20 grams at a time you're not going to get muscle protein synthesis because the liver is going to the liver basically takes first dibs on the protein and under glucogenesis it's just going to make glucose out of protein so if you just trickle tiny amounts of protein in you're not getting muscle protein synthesis I'm turning it into glucose really inefficient process yeah you're just the liver is turning it into glucose if you eat tons of protein and the limit based on the literature seems to be somewhere between 40 and 50 gram in one sitting okay once you exceed 40 to 50 grams in one sitting the excess just goes into glucogenesis huh wow okay this is very so if you're trying to get 140 g a day you really need to optimize it by 4 * 40 and uh wow okay so amazing this is amazing I'm always game to change uh okay so I'm breaking my protein up 4X 40 if 160 is my goal what period of time do I need to put between them because I would be happy to do that like it I'm I what's your feeding window what do you like to eat when to when man I I usually keep it tight like four 5 hours max okay so if you really want to do it that way then you're going to have to have if I need to well but but but I'm saying like if that's working for you from a weight management standpoint and a total caloric I'm a freak of discipline I will never accidentally gain weight you don't have to worry about that with me what you have to worry about with me is right now I believe that autophagy is necessary to avoid cancer I don't want to die of cancer so I intermittent fast to make sure that I'm in autophagy but there's no evidence that 20 hours of fasting is sufficient to induce autophagy yeah see I thought there was man I thought autophagy kicked in at like 15 16 hours like uhuh but mice will die in three days of not eating well that's bad yeah so in other words like we're just it's apples to oranges we have no I mean do we know where it kicks in for humans no because we don't have biomarkers for autophagy uhuh my intuition which might be as useful as a warm bucket of hamster vomit is that it's probably three to five days three to four days maybe do you do any prolong fasting I don't anymore wow um and I'm not opposed to it like I would probably still do you know if you were diagnosed with cancer what would you do yeah I would probably get back to fasting more evidence-based or just throwing everything at it mechanistic yeah give me the mechanism uh meaning deprivation of growth factors yeah very interesting also selective sensitization of cancer versus non-cancer cells during chemo right so there is some evidence from wter Longo's work that when you're undergoing chemotherapy doing so in a caloric deficit can be beneficial because the cancer cell is differentially and disproportionately stressed by restriction and than the normal cell and therefore you're CU remember chemo like the magic of chemo is not that it kills cells or kills cancer cells it's that it selectively kills cancer cells anything can kill a cancer cell it's how do you kill a cancer cell and not a regular cell so how do you how do you enhance the spread between those two and it might be that caloric restriction is a way to do it and it renders the cancer cell even more susceptible and at the same time that you're hitting with chemo it becomes uh more likely to die at the expense of the healthy cell that's that's the mechanism and there is some data to suggest that that's the case Okay so uh autophagy we know is going to kick in at much long we hope is kicking in at much longer periods uh deprivation can still help with cancer from a growth factor remember you also kick in autophagy with exercise so if you're looking for another absolutely what what is autophagy right autophagy selfing well yes yes yes but what it's occurring in nutrient absence M and there's a great way to induce cellular energy reduction which is exercise when you exercise cellular energy goes down that's why exercise increases kinas activity just as fasting does H so we you you don't want to underestimate the benefit of exercise in tricking the cell into thinking its nutrients are scarce okay then what kind of exercise I'm going to guess it has to be the kind that I hate the most most and if V2 Max is the under the curve revealer uh it's what we were talking about very high intensity period of rest very high intensity well that's how you train V2 Max but that is that what I have to do no because that's only that's that should only be 20% of your cardio volume 80% of your cardio volume Should Be steady state uhhuh and moderate intensity okay the 80% I like that a lot better interesting that's zone two as we call it and that's done at a level where you could carry out a conversation if you had to but you don't want to right that's the that's the litmus test that is a perfect description okay so uh going back to protein so maybe in fact no you're you're saying just flat out the intermittent fasting is probably not helping you at all and if anything it's probably making it hard for you to get protein and spare your muscle uh you need to spread this out you spoke in kilograms which really threw me off that's okay how much do you weigh in pounds uh 185 Okay so 160 to 180 grams per day so four meals at 40 to 45 grams is perfect for you okay spread out over ideally as long as possible and to be clear these don't have to be meals like two of my four 45 gram of protein that's a [ __ ] meal it's not though think about it like what is that 200 calories it's like a chicken breast it's yeah that I mean you don't consider that a meal that's a rounding error um no for me like I'm doing I'll do like I have these venison sticks that are 10 like a little jerky venison bought or made uh they're actually now bought you can now buy them I like that y okay um so each one is 10 uh grams of protein M and 50 calories and I will have five of those as a snack there's 50 grams of protein right there with 250 calories like it's nothing okay what about are they highly processed anything to avoid there no problem because they're made they're made by company that I'm involved in so I mean I love it the most obviously as a guy that only gets involved with things that I care about think are real so it's called Maui Nei venis okay these are um this a type of deer called Axis deer that are invasive to the state of Hawaii and so they're harvested there in the most Humane manner fashionable which is what allows the animal to be completely stressfree so they're harvested by sniper at night under night vision and whoa yeah so if you think about it like harvesting an animal is a very stressful thing thing for an animal uhhuh like if you're thinking about how a cow is harvested yeah even if it has the most um wonderful life you know it's grass-fed it's out in a pasture it's not inside like all of that might be great and it is certainly better than the alternative but the very end of its life is still quite stressful this is a moral thing or does this moral no I believe I believe I believe it impacts the quality of the meat right so think about the cortisol levels that are surging through that animal's body right at the time of its death yeah but from an evolutionary standpoint everything got eaten oh no no I'm not that's not a moral question I'm saying from a health perspective yeah but I'm saying you're a lion the gazelle you're chewing on is freaking the [ __ ] out as you eat it alive so there's no way that can have some major no I think it actually probably has an impact on taste more than anything else um the other thing is it's very hard I mean this is more of an argument of why I love Wild game yeah is Wild game eats the best plants the best feed right so when you go to the grocery store and you're buying you know a regular grain fed steak it's not eating what it evolved to eat like it's you kind of want things that are as close to eating what they evolve to eat and you know for for for deer that's like that's basically grass right so um anyway these things are processed in a way that basically has nothing in them right so you're just I'm just getting pure protein yeah I don't want to derail this but this is really interesting so you snipe the deer at night using night vision goggles so it basically dies in its sleep it dies instantaneous yep dies instantaneously stressfree um and that is so interesting how'd you find out about these guys um I met the founder of the company five six years ago um and we just immediately became friends I became completely fascinated by the problem that they were trying to solve which was how you know the government is trying to eradicate this species um because it is destroying the island so this is a species of deer that was brought to Hawaii in the 1950s for hunting but it had no Predator it was brought from India where its only Predator was the tiger you brought it to Hawaii it had no predator and it has now run a mck so it is kind of destroying three islands of Hawaii are they finding a way to do this sustainably now so that they can keep having them the goal is by 20 30 to have it be sustainable right now they are still not able to do it sustainably in other words right now the deer are still growing at a rate that is too significant Jesus uh head shot yes interesting wow I don't know why I find that so fascinating but that's very interesting okay so back to protein intake right so point is you could have a w prot wake up I'm like oh Chomp Chomp into the not necessarily like I mean again it depends on when you like to exercise for example so so I should exercise fasted is that the point of that um it depends if I'm going to exercise first thing in the morning I do it fasted if I'm going to wait a couple of hours I'll have a protein meal first but it doesn't matter because I've always heard that you've got so much glucose if you're eating and now you're just going to get fat and you never going to lose doesn't matter no so so um I generally prefer to exercise fasted but if the workout is getting pushed till later a couple hours later I'm going to have something before not because I need to but because I want to make sure I spread out those proteins servings enough so at least two of my protein servings aren't meals they're like again the jerky is not a meal it's a snack and then like a whey protein shake again 40 50 grams of whey protein in some you know cashew milk you do would you uh I'm willing to stomach the venison snacks Andor chicken breast Andor eggs eggs yep great cool love them uh so if I'm willing to eat the amount of protein that I need in eggs venison whatever would I still do a protein shake not necessarily no not at all and do you cuz I have developed slowly over time a deep aversion to anything that's processed so I'm trying to get as close to biting into the walking animal as possible absolutely y That's great okay so but you you're not stressed and then you would have like kind of two meals right so I'll probably also have like my lunch would be a salad with chicken breast or salmon and then my dinner dinner is the easiest meal to hit your protein Target right like that's like falling off a lot just because it's typical to eat a steak Chien whatever you're going to have talk to me red meat white meat matter again I think it matters less the color of the meat matters much more the source of the meat matters much more about how that anal grain fed yeah and and how close can you get it to an animal that's in its natural state truthfully it's much easier for me to get wild game that's red meat like I much prefer elk and axis deer both Wild game that either I'm killing or someone I know is killing and it's the wild that's the important yeah it's an animal that's eating in the environment it's it's an animal that's not contained right and the contained is problematic largely because of the diet that we know they will need yep okay uh how much meat how much of your protein comes from meat by percentage um I don't know I'd have to figure it out but clearly the majority H yeah because the one thing I've always I also like Greek yogurt by the way so that's another thing that's a hard left so Greek yogurt has a lot of protein it does actually it's quite high in protein eat it because of the taste probiotics just another way to get protein in diversify a little bit from boredom or diversity matters yeah just some no no just for me diversity matters like I like to mix things up and and it's just again it's just a function of time like maybe I don't have time to make an omelet right now and I'm I got a quick call I got to jump on so I can scarf down a bowl of Greek yogurt with some nuts in it this seems impossible it seems too good no sounds amazing like I feel like the way that I live right now would take a lot more discipline than what you're describing be interested to see if that's true in practice um okay so let's fit eggs into the mix here uh i' love to get an idea knowing that individual there's a lot of individual variability here in fact we should probably talk about saturated fat at the individual level the one thing in my diet I do not at all pay attention to how much saturated fat I eat and go out of my way to consume it but I make zero attempt to avoid it and because I don't check my blood levels nearly enough I am always a little hesitant to push my exact diet onto people um do I need to worry about saturated fat potentially yeah um saturated fat can increase your uh synthesis of cholesterol it can also with enough of it being consumed the liver can sense the amount of saturated fat and basically shut down the clearance of cholesterol meaning the the the bringing of cholesterol into the liver can I quote Peter AA on cholesterol in the book outlive if you haven't read it I highly suggest it he said your total cholesterol number is about as meaningful to dying from heart disease as your eye color that's right so you're bringing up cholesterol so some something matters something about cholesterol matters but not the total number right total cholesterol is again not particularly relevant number apob which is the uh con which is a measurement a laboratory measurement that is the concentration of lipoproteins that carry cholesterol into arteries that's what you should care deeply about but when someone says what's your total cholesterol 200 milligrams per deciliter who cares doesn't mean anything but there is a type of cholesterol that is carried in a certain well so cholesterol for the most part that 200 migs per lit is your total cholesterol is divided into three types of lipoproteins a high each has a different carrier uh no that 200 comes is the aggregation of approximately three lipoproteins high density lipoprotein low density lipoprotein and very low density lipoprotein so if you look at your lab you get you get a blood test done if it's done correctly a lot of them are not but if it's done correctly and they do a direct measurement of LDL cholesterol you will be able to add up the V LDL cholesterol the LDL cholesterol the HDL cholesterol and the sum of those three will equal the total cholesterol so if the total cholesterol is 200 and the HDL cholesterol is 70 and the vldl cholesterol is 20 the LDL cholesterol will be 110 yep and of those three numbers um we would say the most important Insight you could get would be to take total cholesterol subtract HDL cholesterol and that number is called non-hdl cholesterol that number starts to become a pretty good predictor of risk so total cholesterol because those are damaging in some way yeah that's now telling you the total cholesterol content of LDL and vldl and those are the destructive lipoproteins now an even better number is not how much cholesterol is contained in those two things but how many of those two things do you have and that's what's captured by apob can you explain that more so each of those lipoproteins the vldl and the LDL have a protein wrapped around them that protein is called APO lipoprotein b00 which is a very sexy name it's abbreviated apob so if you measure apob because LDL and vldl have one and only one APO lipoprotein b00 on them the apob number is is the concentration of those two particles and the gradient of that the more of those particles you have the incre the greater the probability that those particles are getting into your artery walls got it so the the number of those do matter and so if I just subtract out my HDL subtract your HDL from your total cholesterol you get the cholesterol concentration of those two particles but but and that's predictive of risk mhm but what's more predictive of risk is the number of those particles okay so which a how do you I don't know if it's going to be fruitful but there's something in that math that I'm not following so if I got back my cholesterol count and I look at them I'd be able to tell of my 200 let's say uh 110 are the two that are bad uh but there's some total number it sounds like you're it's a separate measurement you don't you wouldn't impute it from the those CL you just have to go to apob you have to get the apob measured that's right yeah it's another laboratory measurement understood understood that is unfortunately rarely done is it can you just ask your doctor give me an apob measurement absolutely okay it's a relatively inexpensive test it's about depending on the test it's somewhere between and $20 do they not do it because they disagree with you or they just they don't know they don't know what it is troubling very okay uh so in fact we should talk at least briefly about this idea so in the book you talk about medicine 3.0 versus Med medicine 2.0 medicine 2.0 is all about curing medicine 3.0 is all about prevention um how do we I would call medicine 2.0 more about treating than curing okay fair it's largely not Curative right very good distinction uh okay so if you were going to give me the um the little toolkit of medicine 3.0 uh what how would you begin to bundle that like what are the the things that I should be going towards well again to your point so medicine 3.0 really says we've reached the limits of what medicine 2.0 is good for medicine 2.0 is really good at curing uh acute problems M so it's really good at curing um infections traumas acute issues it's really bad at treating chronic problems MH cancer uh you know current heart disease neurodegenerative disease type 2 diabetes it's really bad at treating those things and therefore all it really does is prolong the period of time you have those things and I go through a lot of explanation in the book as to why that strategy is not the right strategy so living longer is not accomplished by living longer with disease living longer is accomplished by living longer with out disease once you realize that you inevitably come to the obvious conclusion that a new type of medicine is needed which must be focused on extending the period of time you do not have disease and that word is prevention which has been bastardized to mean virtually nothing because everybody talks about prevention but it has no meaning right so true prevention has to start very early true prevention needs a set of tools that medicine 2.0 doesn't participate in medicine 2.0 which is the medical system that every one of us who's trained goes through is largely A pharmacologic playbook now you're going to get people who sit here and say are all pharmacology is Bad Medicine is bad no no no that's not true at all pharmacology is wonderful pharmacology has done amazing things in medicine 2.0 and we would want to use all of those pharmacologic tools needed in medicine 3.0 but it's literally you know 1 of the equation where is nutrition where is exercise where is sleep where is emotional health those things are also needed to delay the onset of chronic disease and none of us got trained in those tools so if if a doctor is going to help their patient with those other four tools they're going to have to learn about it outside of Medical Training that makes sense uh okay so if we know what we're trying to do is delay the onset of these diseases you talk about that in the book that basically the thing that centenarians have in common is that they probably were able to delay the arrival of heart disease dementia uh because you say this um cancer that these things are building for oftentimes decades that you can see heart disease in teenagers y uh which is pretty crazy so these are people that have probably delayed the onset of the early symptoms of that for decades more than the people that died say 70 or 80 exactly okay that makes sense so now then I want to get to and we'll stay on cholesterol here for a second so uh you talk about in the book that dietary cholesterol does not equal cholesterol in your body so what does what causes bad cholesterol being the thing that I'm certainly more concerned about so dietary cholesterol is very difficult for our body to absorb it has a bulky chemical side chain on it called an Esther and the only way we could absorb it is if we have an enzyme to cut the Esther off called the deesterified and bring it in we don't have much of that enzyme so most of the cholesterol you eat such as the cholesterol in you know shellfish or eggs you poop out M okay so we should just make sure everybody understands that eating cholesterol has almost zero bearing on your cholesterol levels in your blood that doesn't mean that your diet has no bearing on the cholesterol in your blood but your genes play a very significant role in the levels of your blood lipids so we want to always differentiate between cholesterol and lipoproteins cholesterol is the cargo lipoproteins are the boat H so um the term bad cholesterol doesn't actually mean anything people say LDL is the bad cholesterol that's actually very inaccurate right LDL low lipoprotein is the boat that carries cholesterol and LDL is bad but we should really say LDL is the bad lipoprotein the cholesterol in LDL is the same cholesterol in HDL which people call good cholesterol so you can see why it doesn't make any sense now every cell in your body makes cholesterol so 95% of the cholesterol in your body is cholesterol you made the reason every cell in your body makes cholesterol is because it is one of the most important molecules in the body if you couldn't make cholesterol you would have died in utero um and the reason for it is every cell in your body is wrapped in a membrane and that membrane is made of cholesterol most of the um important hormones in your body testosterone estrogen progesterone cortisol are made from cholesterol so this hormone is absolutely this molecule is essential for life um but not every cell can make enough of it so we have to be able to traffic it between cells so we have to be able to take it back to the liver the liver has to be able to package it back out it has to be able to move around the system so if your body is like a big city the Super Highway of that body is the blood the circulatory system and the circulatory system is made of water so when you cut yourself you know you see red stuff come out but don't let the hemoglobin and platelets and things confuse you it's just water with a bunch of red proteins in it um and fat doesn't mix with water cholesterol is a fat it's a lipid and it doesn't dissolve in water so we can't just move cholesterol around in the blood the way we move glucose or the way that we move sodium or potassium those things are dissolving in water they're called hydrophilic and they move around freely cholesterol is not it's hydrophobic it repels water so that's why we have lipoproteins we have to have these lipo proteins to move the cholesterol in and out of the body and that gets to the point of there are basically these different types of lipoproteins some of them are very high density they have lots of protein and a little bit of fat in them some of them are low density lots of fat less protein and some are very low density virtually no protein and lots of fat or cholesterol and they have different properties and it turns out that the low density and the very low density ones are the ones that are arthrogenic meaning they're the ones that promote the destruction of your arteries okay so something is starting to slowly come into Focus for me so fat in the blood is bad cholesterol or fat which one do you mean I mean fat so when we talk about if if I'm understanding what you're saying correctly there are two times now that fat getting loose has sounded like a problem uh well let's not so so fat is rarely FL floating around the bloodstream for the same reason but if A lipoprotein if the very low density is indicated because it has very little protein and a lot of fat well just when I use fat there what I'm really referring to is triglyceride and cholesterol but they're inside the lipoprotein why do it matter that the ratio of protein to Fat starts getting low it only matters in that that's how I'm describing why they difference in density got it so it isn't that it is fat that makes them problematic so what do they do what's problematic is that the low density lipoprotein and the very low density lipoprotein are the only ones that seem to make their way into coronary artery walls or artery walls in general and they have the potential to get stuck in there so the high density lipo protap thing no we don't really have a great sense of it it's something about apob so HDL high density lipo protein doesn't have APO on its surface it has something called APO a on its surface and when a high density lepo protein goes into the artery wall it comes back out when AN apob particle goes into the artery wall sometimes it comes out but sometimes it stays in there and when it stays in there or gets retained bad things begin to happen the first of those things is it undergos a chemical reaction called oxidation that chemical reaction called oxidation creates an inflammatory signal and that tells inflammatory cells called macroasia or monocytes to come they become macrophases and they eat that oxidized LDL molecule that's what kicks off a devastating Cascade in which the body ironically and paradoxically in trying to fix the problem creates a catastrophic problem that ultimately leads to the creation of a plaque that if it ruptures will block the blood supply of the artery and cause a heart attack you've got the two types that end up basically they have the apob on them apob can get stuck in my arteries once it's stuck in my arteries my body sends a immune response effectively that then ends up creating a problem uh is that Cal ification calcification is the final stage of the body trying to repair the problem okay so think of it as the concrete that gets poured on a melting down nuclear reactor so when you get a CT scan that's like what's called a coronary CT scan to look for calcification the presence of that calcification while by itself not problematic is predictive of something bad that's happened I describe I think in the book calcification is like going through a neighborhood and seeing bars on the windows the bars on the windows are actually a good thing they're going to prevent somebody from breaking in but it tells you what kind of neighborhood you're in yeah okay now that makes a lot of sense going on with my diet one thing that I'm very curious about and there's a raging debate online a cal is just a calorie um where where do you come down on that in terms of the quality of the calorie does it matter U if I'm eating ter like if you agree that the quality of the calorie matters but I'm still undere eaing do I have a problem so the the the calorie a calorie discussion always needs some clarification are we talking about with respect to energy balance are we talking about with respect to nutrition and health are we talking about with respect to satiety and and so we have to clarify which of those we're talking about all I'm talking about ever is longevity so so then a calorie is not a calorie for sure right so in other words if you took a bunch of people and put you know one group of them on 2 200 calories a day of Twix bars and another group on 2500 calories of you know one food only lettuce you know or whatever it wouldn't be 2500 calories lettuce but you know 200 calories of venison sticks venison sticks and another group on 2500 calories of some well-rounded diet that's you know you know blah blah they might all end up with the same weight they might have a different Health Quality and they I would expect it I clearly don't expect the guy on 2 200 calories of Twix bars to live as long as the person on 25 200 calories of good food nor do I expect them to feel the same so if you're totally and by the way they might end up at slightly different weights because of how they feel and while you may in this experiment control only their intake you might not be able to to control their energy expenditure so they might actually expend different amounts of energy because of how they feel so um the the calorie as a calorie debate I think is kind of a silly one because a lot of times people are talking past each other when they're yelling at each other and they don't understand what they're talking about and so you you know we just have to understand are we talking about pure controlled you know calorimetry or are we talking about in your case what you're asking about which is I think more important which is Health we are um innately really really bad at estimating risk and oddly enough makes me wonder about you and race cars so what is it that draws you to race cars do you think you're accurately assessing the risk on that I I I will say you know that's not an unusual question I get asked a lot I I think that I feel safer in a race car than I do in my street car really absolutely I feel far far more frightened in the drive I have to take tonight from here to San Diego because I'm going to be on the 405 and the five and I know that 80% of people at some point on that drive are going to be checking their phone or losing focus or not paying attention I don't know what percentage of them maybe 10% of them are also going to be under the influence of alcohol and uh they pose a infinitely greater threat to me than I I feel like I could ever face in a race car so other than driving what are some just grotesque misjudgments of the risk in terms of behaviors that people do just on a daily basis um I think I think Automotive is is a very big one so yeah good that we got that one first I think another one that people sort of misunderstand is alcohol you know I mean I I enjoy alcohol as much as anybody but I don't think people understand how once you get Beyond one to two drinks like how harmful it is on your liver and it's sort of like Tylenol right like at any dose Tylenol is really hard on your liver but for most of us because Tylenol has no good feeling associated with it we don't really tend to use it more than we should we you know if we have a headache we take it and it makes the headache go away and but but we don't find ourselves like taking four Tylenol every day just because of whatever reason and yet I'm I'm constantly amazed at how much people drink even when there's no apparent reason for it right so so there's always a reason to have a drink right there's there you can always come up with a great reason to have a drink but there's too many sort of blah reasons that people are drinking so I think that um that that to me is an asymmetric and unnecessary risk meaning the pleasure that they're getting from that you know those four shitty Budweisers that they have isn't anything worse the potential downside it's causing in the long run which says nothing by the way of how often I think people do get behind the wheel of their car when they've had a drink in them and if there's one thing I've learned in the simulator it's how even one drink compromises your ability when it matters so I remember simulator a driving simulator yeah so I have a driving simulator at home which is where I do much of my learning um but I remember one day I was like yeah I was going to go drive the Sim after dinner and I had a glass of wine with dinner I remember getting in the simulator and I was like what in the hell is wrong with me here like I am missing every Apex my I'm just a little bit off I'm a little bit off and I realized oh I had a glass of wine even one glass of wine is compromising me um so how many times have I gotten a car having two glasses of wine at a restaurant the answer is tons was I legally drunk no I was well below 008 but if even if I'm 006 I'm legally fine is that still a reasonable strategy right and I think the answer is probably not you think there are dietary things that people are doing that have just an asymmetric risk reward yeah you know I'm probably kind of a a huge advocate for caloric restriction um at least intermittent bouts of caloric restriction so I believe that the short-term discomfort of not eating for days once twice four five times a year going through a cycle like that I think that the shortterm inconvenience of that that is Trivial compared to the potential benefit of of a true fast you know water only fast for some period of time and I still don't know what that minimum is I think it's probably a minimum of three days are necessary to start to get some of the real benefits of autophagy mitophagy and things like that but what's the difference between autophagy and mitophagy um autophagy is the cell eating itself and mitophagy specifically is the recycling of the mitochondria okay um so I think when someone says and I have many patients or friends or family members who have said like yeah that's just there's no way I'm ever going to I could never give up food even transiently I think that's that's that comes from like not not even being willing to give it a shot like what's the emotional hangup cuz you were you used to be literally the epitome of the robotic eater just insanely strict and you said about 3 years ago you were like nope not doing that anymore and I think to quote you exactly I no longer have the intestinal fortitude to eat like a robot so there was something in you that it no longer was worth it yeah that became much harder than what I do today which is so so back then I wasn't doing any Tim restricted feeding I wasn't doing any fasting it was is a pure form of dietary restriction so my my sort of mental model for nutrition is everybody is starting out on one side eating the standard American diet abbreviated as sad which is an appropriate abbreviation and the thing I always tell patients on day one is like look the good news is you can't get any worse than this the only thing if you're starting at the sad the only thing you can do to make it worse is eat more of the sad right but it's like the standard American diet and I don't believe this was deliberate right I don't think there's a conspiracy theory here but just through a lot of bad luck uh has arrived at the absolute worst combination of macronutrients you could possibly imagine like you couldn't come up with a way to confuse someone's metabolism than to combine fats and carbohydrates in the ratios that they are combined in most of the foods that we would eat by default if we were left to our brothers so from there I say look there's kind of two introd Rory moves which are not mutually exclusive but you can pick one or the other the first is time restricted feeding where now you don't limit what you eat you just limit when you eat it and then the second is dietary restriction you don't restrict when you eat you don't restrict how much you eat which you also don't restrict in time restri feeding but you restrict certain elements of what you eat so for those three years that I was on a ketogenic diet which is I mean probably one of the most demanding subsets of dietary restriction um you know I'd pulled that lever as hard as it could be pulled then you move into diets that sort of mimic fasting um which is basically just another way of saying hypocaloric diets for transient uh periods of time and then ultimately even beyond that is fasting just you know water only also for limited periods of time nowhere in there do I include constant caloric restriction so you know reducing by 20 30% your energy intake in definitely I I think the data are pretty clear that that is not a winning strategy there's something about the cycling into and out of catabolic versus anabolic State you're basically Clearing House right you're sort of getting the cells that are themselves defective and hopefully the ones with the most effective mitochondria we'd love to Target those the most for other reasons um what you want to see is the regrowth you want to when you refeed you want to see The Selective repopulation of the better cells the most robust experiments done on this in primates did not really suggest that as the diet got better the benefits of caloric restriction got better in other words the worse the diet the better the benefit of caloric restriction which points us to this idea that dietary restriction should still always be some component of a healthy nutrition strategy meaning like if you're eating like [ __ ] stop eating like sh stop eating you really really if you're if you're committed to never eating anywhere but McDonald's caloric restriction will have a much bigger effect on you positively than you know if your Baseline intake is you know the way you would eat for example that kind of stuff at like the Deep cellular level about where we're going and what this is going to look like is is really fascinating to me definitely not something that I have the kind of grip on even remotely close to what you do but nonetheless seems like if you're um really going to get to 100 at a high level it seems like you're going to have to take that pretty seriously now you've talked a lot about one of the tests that you want to make real is the ability to check for autophagy and to see in the blood um you've thrown out a couple times that this is like a you probably know the people that would be creating this test um and B that it wouldn't be you know it's not measured in the billions so what what would that really take um is it something that could be commercialized and would give people the impetus to put the capital up for it or what does that future look like from a funding perspective again this is not not like the world's hardest problem to crack um but I'm if I'm going to be completely truthful I don't know how commercially interesting it is as a general rule diagnostic tests are not very commercially interesting um my interests are not remotely commercial my interest is in just knowing what to do it's like I want this test to tell me exactly what the right fasting protocol needs to be should I be fasting 3 days a month 7 Days Every 3 months 14 days when once a year like I want to know that and there's no amount of money that would make it worth you know not knowing the answer to that question um wow that's a bold statement well think about it and I'm not to suggest that like money doesn't matter and money you can't do great things with money like I want money just as much as the next person but never at the expense like I don't want anything to get in the way of the knowledge that can drive living longer that to me is such a priority that I would rather be poor but know how to you know live longer than have all the money in the world and lose my health I totally get that but I will say one thing I want to talk about is you said that um one you've said that you think that you eat dysfunctionally even if you don't have an eating disorder which I actually thought was really interesting and then you said that part of why you gave up the robotic eating was you were worried about how it's affecting your daughter's view of food talk about that CU I think certainly in this the movement that we're all going through right now there's a real risk of that that if I had had kids 5 years ago when I was like ter I was shredded I was so myopically focused on everything that went in my mouth and I loved it about myself and I would Rave about how much discipline I had so for sure if I had kids they would have been wildly influenced by how much pride I took in not eating and so yeah do worry what that would have done and I thought it was super sensitive of you to recognize that and change yeah I mean my brother um actually was the he he brought this point to my attention first but he said you know be thoughtful about how you describe your own interactions with food and when you're giving you know your kids input on what to eat or what not to eat try to tether it less to you know body dysmorphic ideas and Trigger it you know Peg it more to Performance issues for example right because those things are still true right if you if you eat well or eat poorly it affects your performance it affects your cogn
Resume
Categories