Transcript
fWxhRwO0fJs • Tom Bilyeu Breaks Down Trump’s Awkward Address — And Why It Didn’t Land
/home/itcorpmy/itcorp.my.id/harry/yt_channel/out/TomBilyeu/.shards/text-0001.zst#text/1367_fWxhRwO0fJs.txt
Kind: captions Language: en Trump went on TV, he told everybody, "The economy is great. We're chilling. It's good." And then you look back at the last 11 months. The biggest thing Trump has done in his presidency so far was a big beautiful bill and change a bunch of names on things. >> Yeah. >> I don't think any of those two things will ultimately help the average working person. No tax on tips was a big win. I will give him that. No tax on overtime. I used to be a bartender and I used to rely on both of those things. So, I definitely understand that there is going to be a se of people that are benefited those two. But on the grand scheme of thing with the control of the House, the Republicans, the judiciary, the Supreme Court, I feel like you could have done a lot more in your first year, year and a half. How do you feel about Trump's address in general and just kind of where we are? >> Yeah, let's get into it. This this one was weird. To say that it felt off would be an understatement, but for people that don't know, Donald Trump addressed the nation this week, but rather than feeling confident, it felt like a speedrun of a speech he was mad about giving. And some people say that Susie Wilds literally told him he had to do it. Trump appeared to be reading rather than performing, which is a big part of what I think made this feel so weird for people. The speech itself, though, was from where I'm sitting largely just a straightforward recitation of his economic accomplishments so far. From his perspective, let's be very clear about that. People have done breakdowns about the number of exaggerations in his speech, and being honest, I was tempted to count how many times he said some variation of, "No one has ever seen anything like it." He says that so much, I was literally afraid I wouldn't be able to count that high. Now, many assume that the speech was in direct response to his falling poll numbers. It seems pretty reasonable to me. He's having a hard time of it right now. Others believe he seemed off because there was no crowd for him to feed off of and he's a guy that likes to be up in front of people a bit like a comedian. Other people still, and this one is wild to me, are making out like this was some 40 chess move. And it was him using the address the nation format to get the legacy media to cover his string of accomplishments, but his string of accomplishments are debatable right now. We need more time to see how the economy is playing out. So, that one just feels super weird to me, especially if he's going to give one of the most awkward cadences of his career. He's so good at being Trump. I'm not saying he's like some super talented ortor, but he's a very talented entertainer and so he's very good at getting people's attention. So, that format just felt super weird. So, if that's what we were trying to do, I would say that was a swing and a miss. So, for me, the speech was just meh. It was nothing groundbreaking. It was ultimately forgettable. This is one of the things that makes news now because there's nothing else crazier going on. But I don't think this is something that's going to be remembered. This is going to be ultimately from a midterm perspective is do people actually feel like things are getting cheaper? If things are getting cheaper, then he's going to do well at the midterms. But right now, spin and promises about the economy being great are not going to save him. And the the Republicans, if they want to be successful at the midterms, they are going to have to realize that that is the truth. The only thing that matters is when I'm spending money. Am I able to get to the end of the month in a place that's better than where I was a few years ago? Even just saying that it's better than when Biden was in office isn't really going to do it. You've got to get them back to a point where they feel like they're doing well. Because if they're less stressed, that's not going to be enough to stop them for voting for change. If you want to stop them for voting for change, they've got to feel like they've already got the change that they were looking for. So right now I would say the Republicans are on a collision course for a blue wave or at a minimum just losing the House and the Senate. So they better hope that something actually comes to pass in the coming months between now and next November. Otherwise, not going to be good for them. Not going to be good for them. And then for us as a country, I worry that the thing that's going to replace it is very much going to be socialism. And that will be way worse. Like literally, if you were going to design a set of policies that were meant to exacerbate the exact problems that you're dealing with, it would be socialism. I know they sound good on paper, but they are the accelerant that people should fear. But if Trump isn't able to rectify the economy fast enough, that's precisely what's going to happen. >> Where we are as a nation, we were, it felt, I as if we were sold a bill of goods. I'm trying everything not to bring up this Nick Fuentes clip where he really much kind of broke all the way bad and was like, "Trump lied to you. He spun you. He played you. He said he was going to do these things. There was going to be mass deportations. All these things were happen. They didn't come to pass. And because they didn't come to pass, we now hold up our vote. If you want us to come back for the midterms, we need to start seeing mass deportations. We need to start seeing these things." And I think that there is a faction with MAGA within the right that is like, "Hey guys, y'all said y'all was going to get all these things. Y'all were going to make America great again. We're going to get all these benefits. We got interrupted in 2020 by Sleepy Joe, but now this is our chance. And the chance has come and we haven't seen anything get passed. We've seen one bill get passed and like I said, a slew of renamings. What do you think something he can do practically that would actually push the needle? And I know make prices come down sounds good, but a new Fed chair is going to come through that's going to have debt implications. Like if you were talking to Trump right now and you're saying, "Hey, the American people could really use this." What do you think is the one pulse or one button he can push that would get that 2024 enthusiasm back with his base? >> Trump, you want to get reelected? Here is exactly what you need to do. You need to give people free. That's it. Be a socialist. Lean all the way in. Make your socialism sound awesome to people on the right. So, give big checks to the military. Ding ding ding [laughter] ding ding. Make sure that you are putting money into people's hands. Let them slot into the gambling machine like they did during COVID. let them get really excited about that chance, that chance that something might happen. Deregulate all of that stuff so that people can absolutely go ham in the gambling machine. Please be aware of Daniel Conorman's idea of the loss domain. Everybody's in the loss domain right now. So, what they want is a shot to win it all back. And so, you're going to want to help get that enthusiasm peaked right at the midterms. It's not going to help and it's going to completely obliterate them. But, if you can get them excited, euphoric right at the midterms and it's like, see, we brought the party back. This is 1920s, baby. Don't worry about the fact that it's late in the year 1929. Just it's the 1920s, ripping and roaring. The stock market's going crazy. People are hiring jobs. They're all about to get clobbered. But like if you can create that kind of enthusiasm, then you're going to be fine at the midterms. Now, if I were going to save the country, it would look something like this. Trump, you're you're going to be maligned while you're in office, but you're going to be remembered well by history. And what you're going to do is Margaret Thatcher this You're going to go completely into austerity. You're going to do an actual beautiful deleveraging. And you're going to tell the American people, "Listen, it's going to be hard, but we have a K-shaped economy, which we cannot do. Especially because the upside, all the people that are making money because they're in the markets right now, that is a bubble. How do we know it's a bubble?" Because history. We've lived through this before. We can see that we have totally detached from business fundamentals. And if for AI to become worthy of those valuations, these companies would have to have so much productivity that it would be literally ahistoric, which is possible, but is not going to come very fast. And we cannot bank on a maybe future. And that is what we're doing right now. We need to deal with the reality that we're in and facilitate that being possible, but we have to deal with the world that we're in right now. And that world requires us to balance the budget. And therefore, we're going to have to make some extremely difficult decisions and balance the budget becomes the core of all of that. Margaret Thatcher shows the way forward with something like that. It does have austerity measures. It does mean that you can't be bailing out banks. It does mean that there are going to be a lot of people holding debt that are not going to get paid back, and that is what it is. But you're going to do it in a structured way where you're going to do the four parts of a beautiful deleveraging and all of them hurt somebody and you're going to hurt everybody as little as possible in balance so that we can get an economy moving forward where we are not continuing to saddle the world with debt. And he would be maligned. They they will lose the midterms, that's for sure. And so then it just becomes a question of knowing what needs to get done. Does it become possible if you do it this late in the game? He might have been able to do this if he had done it right out of the gate. But now, if you lose the midterms, you're gonna get the wrong kind of socialism where it's like all free all the time. Billionaires are bad. Businesses are here to rake you across the coals with a total blindness to every tax dollar we have is generated by an entrepreneur somewhere. So yeah, I that advice isn't really realistic given the political realities, but it is what has to